True, the choice of the economic scenario used to drive the model creates an implicit potential error, but that's the reason
why climate modellers develop a range of possible economic scenarios to test in the model.
Not exact matches
Charles Lansdale wonders
why we should believe predictions about
climate change 50 years into the future when computer
modellers sometimes...
The graph was greeted with sneers and chuckles from the mainly
climate modeller audience —
why??
Indeed, it is precisely that reason
why modellers don't spend time tuning models to specific datasets of
climate change — you never know when some feature might disappear.
Why do
climate modellers put uncertainties on their results, but I never hear any uncertainties associated with the costs of implementing Kyoto?
Why hasn't the IPCC and the
climate modeller community conducted this analysis themselves?
Why is there such a difference in tone between the
climate modellers who make the predictions and the politicians announcing a
climate apocalypse?