Sentences with phrase «why creationism»

Writing the introduction to a collection of polemics titled Scientists Confront Creationism, Richard Lewontin attempted to explain why creationism is doomed by its very nature.

This is why creationism is bad for children, because those indoctrinated in it have very poor understandings of what biology even says.

This is why creationism isn't taught.

He made a rational claim and evidence based argument as to why creationism is silly and should not be espoused.

That's why creationism was discarded as a scientific explanation over a hundred years ago.

Not exact matches

So please could a good Christian who has creationism as part of their belief explain why it is absolutely positively essential for them in order to be a Christian.

Why would a sane, reasonable person believe in creationism?

Bill Nye is just worried about his reputation and that is why he is slamming creationism.

God doesn't force us to believe, why should you force others to believe in Creationism or deny Evolution?

I'll check back for Chien's publications and biblelife.org's insightful commentary as to why ID / creationism has invariably failed to gain any traction with either mainstream science or the federal judiciary...

Why don't we teach ID / creationism?

You seem to think god allows» for everything and if that is so why did nt he just create this in the first place... evolution or «allowed» creationism... one or the other but not both... why?

Then explain to me why there is a push to teach creationism and / or intelligent design in public school science classes?

I don't understand why Christians (the ones who believe in creationism) can't see both points of view?

Here is the reason why Christians (and myself included) believe in creationism: The Bible is the Word of God, believing just a part of it means that I don't believe that the Bible is the Word of God.

Find out why he now supports creationism at http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/

All these parents who insist on teaching «creationism» to their kids as «science», while downplaying (or completely / hiding denying) the tangible bona fide evidence of evolution... I sometimes have to wonder why they don't simply feed lead paint to their kids and get it over with.

That's why it is so important to keep ID and Creationism out of our public schools.

Following this logic, why is it that theories of Creationism or Higher Being is any less subject to a flawed epistemology?

I wonder then why Mr. Nye is wasting so much oxygen complaining about the great «harm» the teaching of Creationism does to children... though I may not personally agree with the tenets of Creationism, I do believe in the right of parents to pass their personal religious beliefs on to their children - whether those beliefs are Christian, Hindu, Muslim, etc....

Why to do we insist on seperating creationism and evolution.

Lewontin thus saw creationism as falsified not so much by any discoveries of modern science as by universal human experience, a thesis that does little to explain either why so absurd a notion has attracted so many adherents or why we should expect it to lose ground in the near future.

Tell us again why it is evolution is taught in schools but yet creationism can't be?

Why is it that so many people can't see that the ideas of evolution and creationism can coexist without conflict?

That is why we have the resurgence of Creationism in the US.

The main problem of creationism is that it stems (and feeds) from the holes of evolutionary biology and this is why no one with more than two neurons take it seriously.

The problem is that Creationism doesn't stop at «why»; it claims to answer the «how» and the «when» with religious dogma from a pre-science cosmogonic myth.

This is why true religious adherents are so singularly closed minded, and why the bad ideas fostered by religious thinking — like creationism — repeat themselves over the course of centuries.

Why indeed invite monist philosophers, even some tending towards process theology, when not inviting those seen as tending towards creationism?

Why can't evolution and creationism (as told in the Bible) co-exist?

Questions were asked about why it took the government so long to impose the bar on creationism, given concerns about it being taught were raised as soon as the academies programme was introduced.

reasons why you cant trust carbon dating creationist creationism evolution dinosaurs..

If you believe the (literally) «goat droppings» of denialist climate science liars, why don't you believe those who do the same regarding creationism and biology, or medicine and HIV denial, or any number of topics that fit into the set of antiscience?

Further, what do you even define as an «orderly debate,» why are «orderly debates» as you would define them necessary to thresh out the truth and validity in a scientific theory, and in what ways are the current debates over creationism / evolution, or (non)- CAGW not meeting this standard and being hindered accordingly?