Not exact matches
With an abundance of
choice,
why should students consider paying tuition at a college or university that is unable to deliver on the core mission of higher
education?
Newsflash: While some women make
choices for their births that others don't see the sense of, the best response would be to ask
why they made that decision in a balanced manner and get an
education rather than judge and scream and accuse, which helps nobody.
«We are of the view that the action taken by the General Legal Council constricts the parameters for legal
education instead of expanding them, and they have very negative implications on everything... There can never be an overproduction of lawyers, we need lawyers in every area aspect of society, so we don't know
why we would make
choices that will effectively constrict legal
education....
So for me the international perspective and the opportunity to specialize the
education to my own interest was the reason
why Aalborg University was the right
choice.
We help you understand the what and
why behind your food
choices and provide you with the knowledge and
education to make smart
choices on your own.
In our recent article for
Education Next, «Choosing the Right Growth Measure,» we laid out an argument for
why we believe a proportional growth measure that levels the playing field between advantaged and disadvantaged schools (represented in the article by a two - step value - added model) is the best
choice for use in state and district accountability systems.
The poor, so this logic goes, need government assistance if they are to get a good
education, which helps explain
why, in the United States, many school
choice enthusiasts believe that the only way the poor can get the
education they deserve is through vouchers or charter schools, proxies for those better private or independent schools, paid for with public funds.
The poor, so this logic goes, need government assistance if they are to get a good
education, which helps explain
why, in the United States, many school
choice enthusiasts believe that the only way the poor can -LSB-...]
The poor, so this logic goes, need government assistance if they are to get a good
education, which helps explain
why, in the United States, many school
choice enthusiasts believe that the only way the poor can get the
education they deserve is through vouchers or charter schools, proxies for those
U.S. Students Know What, But Not
Why Science Insider, June 19, 2012 «The computer simulations offer NAEP a much better way to measure skills used by real scientists than do multiple -
choice questions, says Chris Dede, a professor at Harvard Graduate School of
Education.
The study, involving 8,000 families, looked at how school
choice was affected by parents»
education, household income and their educational aspirations for children, as well as
why some families later decided to switch schools.
Education isn't just about maximizing student
choice and catering to «consumer» interests; it is about fostering democratic citizenship, which is
why all taxpayers fund public schools.
There are many reasons
why families decide that online
education is the best
choice for the child.
But all of them evade a simple explanation for
why education standards with regular assessments of student progress, transparency for results, consequences for school failure, and
choices for families have always been under fire.
«The reality is that we've had very small expansions in the use of market forces, so, not surprisingly, we've had modest effects from
choice programs,» writes Jay P. Greene, head of the Department of Education Reform at the University of Arkansas, in Why America Needs School Choice (a book that arrived in the midst of the 2011 acti
choice programs,» writes Jay P. Greene, head of the Department of
Education Reform at the University of Arkansas, in
Why America Needs School
Choice (a book that arrived in the midst of the 2011 acti
Choice (a book that arrived in the midst of the 2011 activity).
Dissent in the ranks is probably
why the Republican
education platform focuses chiefly on school
choice, not specific curriculum initiatives, so it will be interesting to see where Romney lands on schools if elected.
[The politics of rationing
education is a reason
why districts and other traditionalists also oppose the expansion of public charter schools and other forms of school
choice that are helping Black and Latino children attain high quality
education; charters fall outside of the control of districts and therefore, open the doors of opportunity for those historically denied great teachers and college - preparatory curricula.]
1) Charter schools, vouchers, and other «
choice» programs don't provide a better
education —
why expand them?
If the idea of
choice isn't threatening in any other capacity, then
why is it so threatening for
education?
The other problem with 529s for school
choice: Yesterday, Dropout Nation explained
why the plan by Congressional Republicans and the Trump Administration to transform 529 higher
education savings vehicles to expand school
choice does little for poor and minority communities who lack the incomes and wealth to use them.
In response to a call to AFC's national headquarters to ask
why they are interested in funding election campaigns for lawmakers in North Carolina, Matt Frendewey, communications director, said via email, «as the nation's voice for educational
choice, AFC and its coalition partners in states such as North Carolina support candidates on a bipartisan basis who believe in strengthening
education by giving parents more educational options for their children.»
Slekar's beliefs about the flaws of school
choice are
why he's deeply disappointed with Secretary of
Education Betsy DeVos and the proposed education budget, although he's not surprised wit
Education Betsy DeVos and the proposed
education budget, although he's not surprised wit
education budget, although he's not surprised with either.
While I generally agree that Betsy DeVos is bad for
education because of her inexperience in
education and overt efforts to use
education reform «to advance God's kingdom,» I take offense with your position that charters and
choice are not what Latino families need, and here's
why:
Fordham Institute's Peter Meyer on
why school
choice is a critical part of moving American public
education from its Model T Ford design.
Although some
education reformers who support vouchers can be quick to create a false narrative around the reasons
why, it is true that many of us, including myself, believe that school
choice should be public school
choice.
Here are 10 reasons
why online
education continues to grow in popularity (and
why it might be the right
choice for you).
This is
why movement conservatives not engaged in
education discussions are naturally be more - supportive of measures such as the expansion of school
choice (because they conform to their views that markets and private actions by families should be the deciding forces in
education) than of other reform efforts that seem to involve what they may perceive more - robust federal or state government roles, or involve what they consider to be an abrogation of roles they think should be in the hands of families or local governments.
The 74 A Summer
Education Meltdown:
Why Everyone in DC Is Mad About ESSA, Congress, Charters,
Choice — or All of the Above
This is
why we celebrate National School
Choice Week, an annual event recognizing every type of
education option for children, including traditional public schools, public charter schools, magnet schools, online learning, private schools, and homeschooling.
Today's must read — Greater Baton Rouge Business Report publisher Rolfe Mccollister's column asking
why government and public
education leaders resist innovation — offering more
choices and conveniences to customers?
We are surrounded with a plethora of
choices, so
why should
education be void of
choice, selection and opportunity?
Sometimes people wonder
why I'm so consumed with issues around educational equity, school
choice, standards, accountability and the need for a strong federal role in
education.
By Valerie Strauss February 27, 2011; 11:00 AM ET Categories: Accountability, Charter schools, Guest Bloggers, Performance pay, Teacher assessment Tags: accountability movement, charter schools, geoffrey canada, merit pay, michelle rhee, performance pay, school
choice, teacher pay, teachers, waiting for superman Save & Share: Previous:
Why NAEP science scores were so low Next: James Franco's unusual
education
A Camino Nuevo Charter Academy student explains
why she wants the Los Angeles Unified School District Board of
Education to select Camino Nuevo as the operator of a new school under the Public School
Choice Resolution.
That's
why some districts are taking advantage of a 2015 law that allows them to become exempt from many provisions of the Texas
Education Code — but are they making wise
choices?
Why do we not allow parents to exercise that same right to
choice in the
education of their child?»
Why the continued resistance to full
choice in K — 12
education?
«That is
why we are reforming our
education system, and free schools form an integral part of improving
choice for parents and raising standards for all young people.
In an interview in today's Star - Ledger, Newark Superintendent and former New Jersey Commissioner of
Education Chris Cerf discusses the threat of a charter school moratorium, his views on «boutique» charter schools in leafy suburbs,
why NJEA leaders and Save Our Schools - NJ fight so vociferously against public charters yet give discriminatory magnet schools (and their own access to school
choice) a pass, the impending governorship of Phil Murphy, and how Newark charters are incubating new ideas and sharing them with traditional schools.
Jocelyn Lopez, a Camino Nuevo Charter Academy student explains
why she wants the Los Angeles Unified School District Board of
Education to select Camino Nuevo as the operator of a new school under the Public School
Choice Resolution.
Maybe that's also
why school
choice should be a part of any «open discussion» about how best to deliver
education.
Lance Izumi, Koret Senior Fellow and Senior Director of PRI's Center for
Education, made a powerful case for
why all students and parents need school
choice on the nationally - televised morning show «Fox and FriendsR...
That's
why we need to support parental
choice in
education.»
Education Bloggers Daily Highlights 2/28/2017 Education Bloggers Daily Highlights Courtesy of Big Education Ape A special thank you to education blogger Mike Simpson For More Visit: http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/ Seven Reasons Why School Choice ≠ School Reform National School Boards Association — LFA Seattle Schools Community Forum: Something to Listen To, Something to Consider about ICE and S
Education Bloggers Daily Highlights 2/28/2017
Education Bloggers Daily Highlights Courtesy of Big Education Ape A special thank you to education blogger Mike Simpson For More Visit: http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/ Seven Reasons Why School Choice ≠ School Reform National School Boards Association — LFA Seattle Schools Community Forum: Something to Listen To, Something to Consider about ICE and S
Education Bloggers Daily Highlights Courtesy of Big
Education Ape A special thank you to education blogger Mike Simpson For More Visit: http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/ Seven Reasons Why School Choice ≠ School Reform National School Boards Association — LFA Seattle Schools Community Forum: Something to Listen To, Something to Consider about ICE and S
Education Ape A special thank you to
education blogger Mike Simpson For More Visit: http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/ Seven Reasons Why School Choice ≠ School Reform National School Boards Association — LFA Seattle Schools Community Forum: Something to Listen To, Something to Consider about ICE and S
education blogger Mike Simpson For More Visit: http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/ Seven Reasons
Why School
Choice ≠ School Reform National School Boards Association — LFA Seattle Schools Community Forum: Something to Listen To, Something to Consider about ICE and Schools...
WHY: To celebrate and acknowledge the educational
choices of New Jersey families and the significant contributions of charter schools to the public
education landscape in New Jersey.
Why PAA opposes California's Parent Trigger law: It represents neither real parent
choice nor empowerment California's Parent Empowerment Act passed in early 2010 and has been supported by backers of corporate
education reform nationwide.
Not only does it completely discount the actual public reasons
why we fund a universal K - 12 system — such as citizenship — but also it has never and can never deliver the equality of
choices that DeVos and
education reformers keep promising.
After all, the nation spends over $ 600 billion annually on public
education, but only 9 % of that is federally funded which is
why Trump's voucher and
choice proposal assumes, very optimistically, that states will kick in over $ 100 billion additionally over the $ 20 billion from the federal government.
You're inspired, you're passionate, you've just received your invitation for an in - depth interview and you're ready to sell your experience about
why you're going to make an exceptional Fellow, but... BUT you're not really sure
why Betsy DeVos was a controversial
choice for Secretary of
Education, the argument between charter school vs traditional public school vs school vouchers alludes you, and you once thought Common Core was a pilates ab workout.
For example, a family that takes the time and effort to apply to a charter school, might be more involved in their student's
education than a family that just sends their student to the neighborhood school, and that might be
why we see
choice school students performing better than the traditional public school students.