Topics are focused on the unique issues and opportunities facing women working in the alcohol beverage industry, including
why gender diversity is good for business, mentoring to empower the next generation of leaders, understanding unconscious bias, thriving in the male - dominated alcohol beverage industry, and others.
Panels and speakers will focus on topics ranging from a roadmap to closing the gender pay gap, the business incentive for
why gender diversity and inclusion is good for the bottom line, best practices for starting or maintaining a mentorship program and succession planning, professional and personal development, how to navigate a career in the alcohol beverage industry and a look at what is to come for women in the industry.
If you're looking to get a concise understanding of
why gender diversity matters — particularly on a macro level — watch this three - minute video.
Not exact matches
The Ontario government and the Ontario Securities Commission have both endorsed «comply or explain» policies, which require boards to develop and disclose policies to improve their
gender diversity, or else explain
why they haven't.
So
why does
gender diversity even matter, anyway?
Ever since the Ontario Securities Commission implemented a rule last year that TSX - listed companies must address
gender diversity on their boards or explain
why they haven't, corporate Canada has been scrambling to hire female directors.
That's
why they left their respective venture capital firms last month to start Aspect Ventures, a fund that aims not only to invest in early - stage mobile startups but to infuse these fledgling companies with some added
gender and cultural
diversity.
-- Fenwick:
Gender Diversity Survey 2013 Maier flipped the research on its head by posing the question: «
Why do we have to say «having 20 % of women on boards shows a positive result for companies instead of «having 80 % of men on boards shows a negative result for companies?
Why, asks John Leo in U.S. News & World Report, is his own constituency so willing to bring him down with protests, disrupted basketball games, and boycotts, when Pres. Lawrence worked so hard to make Rutgers a campus that «bristles with the enforcement tools of
diversity: a speech code, real courses replaced by «multicultural curricular change,»
diversity awareness «training» in lectures and freshman orientation sessions, a tolerance for ethnic and racial segregation in dorms («a self - affirming environment,» as Lawrence puts it), and professors who learn not to raise unapproved ideas about race,
gender, and the campus power system built around multiculturalism»?
If asked
why this has happened, they tend to point a finger at the way in which Labour's «
diversity agenda» for the civil service was implemented: background or
gender or ethnicity came to count for more than ability, and the institutional memory of the machine was stripped out by change for change's sake.
One must ask, «
Why does boosted
gender diversity on boards increase the level and quality of CSR?»
Why is
gender diversity important?