Sentences with phrase «why global warming alarmists»

And I assume the Sierra Club would issue a public retraction if confronted with the facts that the data are precisely as I described that over the last 18 years there has been no significant warming and indeed that is why global warming alarmists invented the term «the pause» to explain what they called the pause in global warming because the data demonstrate what you just said, that the Earth is cooking and warming, is not back up by the data.

This is also why global warming alarmists try to do their best to quench anything related to the the solar variability → cosmic ray flux → atmospheric ionization → low altitude cloud cover link which by now has ample evidence for support, both empirical and experimental.

Not exact matches

(3) Does the absence of warming over the past 15 years disprove the alarmists» theories about catastrophic global warming and, if not, why not?

For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.

The litany of failed, alarmist predictions is why scientific organisations, such as the BoM, have — tragically — become almost the last places to hear the truth about global warming climate change.

May 3, 2004 CHC held a congressional and media briefing entitled «Impacts of Global Warming: Why the Alarmist View is Wrong» on Capitol Hill.

The relationship of Patrick J. Michaels to the event: Speaker The Impacts of Global Warming: Why the Alarmist View is Wrong http://www.globalwarming.org/article.php?uid=632 Congressional and Media Briefing held at the Longworth House Office Building, Washington, D.C. Sponsored by the Cooler Heads Coalition The relationship of Patrick J. Michaels to the event: Speaker

In November, 2015, the three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — wrote a small book titled Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming: The NIPCC Report on Scientific Consensus revealing how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Why can't the global warming alarmists lead us by example instead of simply trying to pick our pockets?

• The Koch - funded climate denial machine • Why the public is losing trust in scientists • How alarmist propaganda has skewed the climate debate • How climate change has contributed to a new literary genre • The impact of social media and the «Kardashian Factor» • Climate and the «clash of values» • Global warming or global coGlobal warming or global coglobal cooling?