One has only to examine the motives of those who make their income from publishing books versus those who earn their income from doing science to get a hint of
why global warming deniers tend to focus on only the findings that support their point of view.
Not exact matches
Why do they lump the gospel of Jesus Christ with faving lower taxes (not caring for the poor),
deny global warming (not being good stewards for the environment), refuse reasonable gun control (being common sense good citizens)?
His indifference to the harm done to the public mind by the AGW
deniers is perhaps
why so many skeptics find comfort in Pielke's message, and
why so many casual observers mistake him for a
global warming skeptic.
Why the relentless labeling of those who point out weaknesses in the
global -
warming models as «
deniers,» or agents of the «denial machine,» or deceptive practitioners of «denialism?»
The reason
why the phrases «Anti-science», «Evidence -
deniers», and» Global Warming Deniers» are used is that the «Anti-science Deniers» ignore demonstrable evidence, and fabricate stories and «facts» that are not
deniers», and»
Global Warming Deniers» are used is that the «Anti-science Deniers» ignore demonstrable evidence, and fabricate stories and «facts» that are not
Deniers» are used is that the «Anti-science
Deniers» ignore demonstrable evidence, and fabricate stories and «facts» that are not
Deniers» ignore demonstrable evidence, and fabricate stories and «facts» that are not true..
In a letter to the editor of the Charleston (WV) Gazette dated Oct. 30, 2009 Blankenship
denied that
global warming exists, and stated: «
Why should we trust a report by the United Nations?
But
why are so many of them involved in efforts to
deny global warming?
That is
why America owes
denier William Grey and Kyoto - fighter George Bush so many kudos for standing tall against the nihilism of the Left's Doomsday
Global Warming Machine when it was the most hard for anyone to do that.
There is no reasonalbe explanation for
why anyone would
deny Earth's climate is the result of the holistic process we call nature and certainly no non-political explanation other than superstition or ignorance
why and federal climatist would believe that a monophysical element like CO2 with properties as we observe on Earth could ever possible explain
global warming — especially when we know that the Sun is the only independent variable that nominally explains both
global warming and cooling.
The #ExxonKnew campaign has gained enormous traction in the public mind and many want to know
why the corporation started out as such an honest broker in the 1970s, conducting its own climate science research, and then doing an about - face in the 1980s, blatantly
denying the reality of
global warming and working with other groups to manipulate public opinion so as to thwart a rational public response.
And
why are meteorologists
denying global warming?
Pingback: Wonk Room» Inhofe Calls For Criminal Investigation Into
Why EPA «Suppressed» A
Global Warming Denier
Yes, I have read arguments
why one should
deny global warming or actions against it, just not any honest and sane arguments.
If you're wondering
why Congress has yet to tackle this
global crisis despite overwhelming scientific consensus and ballooning costs of inaction, Think Progress has an interactive map that shows the huge sums of political donations given by the oil and gas industry alongside which members of Congress
deny the realities of
global warming.
Why would the Trump administration enthusiastically embrace, promote, and back geoengineering / climate intervention programs given the fact that Donald Trump and most of his appointees patently
deny that there is any
global warming in the first place?
Why do
deniers on facing the consensus of 97 % of scientists on the cause of
Global Warming have a the same look as a puppy who has had his nose rubbed in his own excrement?