The plan is also expected to raise questions about
why grammar schools are being prioritised when free transport schemes in some areas face significant cuts.
There's a simple reason
why some grammar schools are adding a form of entry, as each pupil brings funding.
Unions have also asked
why grammar schools are prioritised when free transport schemes in some areas face significant cuts.
Some people use stories like mine as an example of
why grammar schools are a good idea.
Not exact matches
PM struggling to explain
why she wants to create new
grammar schools.
By their very nature,
grammar schools are for the few, otherwise
why have them?»
Participants learn through: - Participating in a fun pub - style quiz to eradicate common spelling, punctuation, and
grammar misconceptions and errors; - Considering the role of parents, their needs and interests, and what they expect from their child's
school, as a means to understand
why schools sometimes receive difficult communications; - Reading and analysing examples of poor written correspondence, considering how both the tone and the accuracy can be improved; - Exploring different language strategies to create a personal, polite tone within emails, by considering the connotations of different words; - Taking away help sheets that can be referred to whenever written communications are being drafted.
Add to this nebulous college entrance environment the challenge presented by the proliferation of four - year high
schools, whose numbers skyrocketed from 2,526 in 1890 to 10,213 in 1910, and it is easy to see
why the trustees of the Carnegie Foundation felt the need to define college: «An institution to be ranked a college must have at least six (6) professors giving their entire time to college and university work, a course of four full years in liberal arts and sciences, and should require for admission not less than the usual four years of academic or high
school preparation, or its equivalent, in addition to the preacademic or
grammar school studies.»
When asked
why she thought her friends didn't engage with computer science, Roseanna, Year 8 at Townley
Grammar School said: «I don't think they see the creative side in computer science.
That's
why, in addition to
grammars for the top 15 % of pupils, we need to create other
schools that cater for the bottom 15 % - and resource them appropriately.
Firstly it's been shown that the convertor academies who were expected to help poorly performing local
schools almost universally failed to do this in any realistic way so
why would we expect it to work between
grammar / secondary modern
schools?
«We know that
grammar schools provide a good education for their disadvantaged pupils, which is
why we want more pupils from lower income backgrounds to benefit from that.»
«But we know there is more to do, and that's precisely
why we have set out plans to make more good
school places available, to more parents, in more parts of the country - including scrapping the ban on new
grammar school places, and harnessing the resources and expertise of universities, independent and faith
schools.»
«That's
why our consultation on creating more good
school places in more parts of the country includes proposals to scrap the ban on new
grammar schools — on the strict condition they improve the education of other pupils in the system — as well as harnessing the expertise and resources of our universities, and our independent and faith
schools.»
The Ofsted boss told the Freedom and Autonomy for
Schools National Association (FASNA) conference this morning that grammar schools were not the answer to the nation's problems, but said there was no reason why comprehensive schools should not «celebrate the importance of tradition, ritual and formality&
Schools National Association (FASNA) conference this morning that
grammar schools were not the answer to the nation's problems, but said there was no reason why comprehensive schools should not «celebrate the importance of tradition, ritual and formality&
schools were not the answer to the nation's problems, but said there was no reason
why comprehensive
schools should not «celebrate the importance of tradition, ritual and formality&
schools should not «celebrate the importance of tradition, ritual and formality».
Which is
why people are getting angry about
grammar schools.
A Department for Education spokesperson said: «The Sutton Trust itself has highlighted the positive impact
grammar schools can have on pupils from less well - off backgrounds and that's exactly
why we want more young people to benefit.
Taking Stock: How Standardized Test Reports Let Us Down under NCLB (2016) The Testing Mess -
Why It Won't Go Away (2016) The
Grammar of American
Schooling and the Challenge of the Common Core (2014) Testing and the Common Core (2012) Something's Wrong with Illinois Test Results (2009)
FSM representation at Reading's
grammar schools is < 1.2 % compared to 18.2 % in the LA killing dead any theory that a large catchment can promote socially inclusive but it's not hard to see
why.
That's
why we need an education policy for all our children, not just a tiny minority in
grammar schools.»
«That's
why the proportion of disadvantaged children at
grammar schools is extremely low, just 2.6 per cent of kids on free
school meals,» Powell said.
We cruise through
grammar school, junior high, high
school, and college, never asking what we're doing,
why we're doing it or whether we like it.
Once again, if the reason for the LLB to JD switch is to ensure that employer recognize that the JD holder isn't some snot - nose kid just out of the equivalent of
grammar school but (generally) has some prior academic standing (even if it is in sheep - dip marketing from Woolabunga U),
why demand the right to be called «Doctor Fawlty»?