Can they participate in panels on
why hate speech should not be criminalized?
Not exact matches
To block very hurtful comments that do not use
hate speech (something like «
why don't you step in front of a truck») could be perceived as limiting free
speech.
In many countries you can be jailed for
hate speech, and a lot of the fundamentalist preachers in this country would be jailed for what they say —
why do you think they go to places like Africa with their
hate and not to Canada or Europe?
Why do they tend to favor violent, war - like solutions, and
hate filled
speeches?
And
why is pointing this out «
hate speech» Drop the rhetoric, get over yourself, and actually try to address the points I'm making.
I know some think claiming «Biblical misinterpretations» is better than calling the Word of God «
hate speech», but all of us are accountable for deliberate misinformation; that's
why we must judge for ourselves.
I don't understand
why he is able to stay on the air with his
hate speech all the time.
Why is it when something offends the muslims it is
hate speech but when someone wants to insult Christians it is totally ok to do so?
Why is it «
hate speech» when someone comes out against gays but not normal christians?
I thought that it was a Federal crime to preform
hate speeches...
why isn't this guy in jail!
That is
why he is now blaming not himself but the companies who have stopped advertising on his show for their decision to separate themselves from his
hate speech.
Why are people to disparage the name of my God, yet if I say anything derogatory about muhammad or allah it's called «
hate speech?»
, the film's Phoebe Cates
speech about
why Debbie
hates clowns.
That's
why keeping it clear of
hate speech can only be a good thing.
Once the class has confronted what
hate speech is, seen firsthand
why it's damaging, and taken steps to stop it in their classroom, see if students can find a series of ways to prevent or attack the use of
hate speech in their larger community circles.
While striking down a portion of the Human Rights Code, the Supreme Court has otherwise upheld the validity of the
hate speech provision in the Saskatchewan Human Rights Code, and in so doing, reminded us of
why these protections remain useful.
The very concept of
hate speech allows us to explore and debate
why speech is offensive, what impact discriminatory words have on our society, and whether there are more positive means of naming and categorising things in our lives.
Twitter's EMEA VP for public policy and communications, Sinead McSweeney, who was fielding questions on behalf of the company this time, agreed that the tweets in question violated Twitter's
hate speech rules but said she was unable to provide an explanation for
why they had not been taken down.