There are an infinite number of reasons
why intelligent people disagree on CAGW.
I once asked Michael Wolff
why intelligent people would deny climate change.
I asked Stephen Greenspan, the author of Annals of Gullibility: Why We Get Duped and How to Avoid It, to explain
why intelligent people accepted our April Fool's stories.
Another «good Christian» who is nothing but a poster child for
why intelligent people want nothing to do with the religious insane like him.
Not exact matches
Confirmation bias is the primary reason
why otherwise
intelligent people get caught up in asset bubbles that are obvious in the unforgiving light that comes the morning after.
Why is it that the most
intelligent people on this earth are usually atheist?
Which brings me to my point:
Why would any
intelligent person take tales from the bronze age (or read out of a hat for that matter) for real?
So, maybe that's
why there are plenty of
people from 400, 800, or 2,000 years ago who didn't have your «advanced» knowledge but were still more
intelligent than you and believed.
Why do otherwise
intelligent people believe in such silly fairy tales they know can't possibly be true?
Why do atheists continuously assert that only a moron could believe the God of Abraham is real — a) many brilliant people are Christians — b) even if you do nt believe in the God of Abraham, why is it impossible for you to accept that an intelligent person cou
Why do atheists continuously assert that only a moron could believe the God of Abraham is real — a) many brilliant
people are Christians — b) even if you do nt believe in the God of Abraham,
why is it impossible for you to accept that an intelligent person cou
why is it impossible for you to accept that an
intelligent person could?
-- b) even if you do nt believe in the God of Abraham,
why is it impossible for you to accept that an
intelligent person could?»
Why do otherwise
intelligent people turn off their brain when they open the bible?
The capacity we have for maintaining cognitive dissonance can explain
why some of the most
intelligent people can believe in a higher being.
This is
why religion serves the less -
intelligent people so much more.
We just can't fathom
why these otherwise
intelligent people can't see how bizarre worshipping gods is!
@Rachel, you seem like an
intelligent person, so
why would you choose a religion that hates you for your gender?
«
Why should an
intelligent person believe in God?»
You'd think that we would at least have one
intelligent person to vote for yet here we are, forced once again to choose the better amougst the worst...
why even vote?
I mean nothing can prove that religion is godly made: maybe needed, but if a God creates all this which even in science terms called
intelligent design
why only so called religios
people have to fight evoulation or defend a God?!
Those of us outside the congregation find religious belief a fascinating subject and are eager to learn as much as we can about this curious practice and
why it affects so many otherwise
intelligent people.
Idea... Hawaiiguest...
why don't you and ummm Tom Tom get together and play scrabble... then you can sit around til the end of time laughing at all the dumb
people and tell eachother how important and
intelligent you are...??
Why would
intelligent, sane
people continue to follow and support this man?
Why do otherwise
intelligent, reasonable, and well - meaning
people use this book to find artificial differences among us; differences that sometime result in our killing each other, or subjugating each other, or rejecting each other.
Aubameyang is definitely better than giroud, and for those who do not watch the bundesliga, he's not all about speed, he's quite an
intelligent player who is always at the right place at the right time, he's also good with both feet and in the air.But the problem with most Arsenal fans is that they are more interested in the NAME rather than the player.That's
why you see
people floating names like higuain, benzema and cavani around.
Why do you think anyone listens to the
people pushing
intelligent design as an alternative to evolutionary theory?
We believe that a long term relationship requires two
people to really gel, which is
why we prioritize an
intelligent matchmaking process and create connections between our users that we're confident can go the distance.
The website believes that long - term relationship needs two
people who go well together, and this is
why the site prioritizes an
intelligent process of matchmaking, and form connections between their users that they are confident will be able to go the distance.
Register today to find out
why more and more
people are selecting EliteSingles from the other dating sites in Johannesburg and choose dating online as a safe and
intelligent way to meet their partner.
If he is content to continue making sophisticated, funny films that critics and
intelligent people enjoy while the general public ignores,
why should we question his instincts?
But, hey, you're all
intelligent, sophisticated
people (I take much for granted), so use this time just to ponder the meaninglessness of nothing and
why Ally McBeal is still on the air.
I am troubled and perplexed as to
why seemingly
intelligent people ignore the facts and distort the truth about the charter schools in Connecticut.
WHY DO YOU HATE AUTHORS, AMAZON?!! It's such a transparent ploy that it boggles my mind that a lot of seemingly
intelligent people seem to fall for it.
However, they are considered as
intelligent dogs, and that is the exact reason
why some
people still use them for detecting explosives and drugs.
If the Wii's controls make it a bad system,
why are its competitors, companies run by
intelligent people, rushing to match the same «gimmick» that defines the system?
It's plain the
intelligent people at Sony know this, so
why let the opportunity wither?
Why would an
intelligent person continue to rely upon a filthy finite energy source that is poisoning him?
I expect
intelligent people to understand
why a serfdom could be sustainable in terms of design, yet unsustainable, because it is crystal clear to me.
Why won't you, Crook, Lomborg, Pielke, and other highly
intelligent, well - informed
people listen to two climate scientists with impeccable credentials, Wigley and Budyko, who claim that for $ 10 billion per year we can keep the earth cool for decades, long enough for us to curb greenhouse gas emissions without clobbering the world's economy?
Why do so many apparently informed,
intelligent, educated
people still believe in ManBearPig?
But in my opinion that's one of the reasons
why there are sceptics — because
intelligent people don't get told the whole story and don't believe the rubbish that the media spit out.
There are so many highly
intelligent people to engage in discussions with on this topic I do not know
why people waste their time with someone who does not even have a rudimentary education in the subject.
The bigger challenge may be to understand
why so many
intelligent people would be so willing to ignore the warnings and sacrifice their offspring.
That is part of
why I believe Bengtsson, that normally
intelligent people are acting like zombies, attacking friends when they actually haven't read the science.
I have no idea
why this global warming issue makes usually
intelligent people put themselves on such intellectually «thin ice.»
Or else you may become like the guy who who wrote in a newspaper forum defending the greatness of Elitism and
why Raffles Institution should continue to be the bedrock of
intelligent people who will be groomed to become lawyers and doctors.
Be prepared to elaborate in
person to discuss the innovation and risk you took, what you did to assure yourself that it was an
intelligent risk,
why you failed (showing post failure introspection), and what you learned from the experience.
Robert, if someone has actually EARNED a commission,
why would an
intelligent person want to cut them out!