While Greg Tonkinson said: «Honestly wondering why it's acceptable, as you see it, to make a mockery of something others believe in?»
It is not acceptable to put a gun to a neighbor's head and demand money so
why is it acceptable when it is done through the force of government?
And
why is it acceptable to poke fun at Jesus when other sacred figures are deemed off limits or there is hell to pay for mocking them?
Why is it acceptable to bring up choice when it comes to killing an extremely immature human life, or who straight people go home with from the bar, but not with gays?
I saw all types waxing lyrical about us after the City game, but
why is that acceptable behaviour when we win and not when we tragically lose?
It still doesn't explain why it's acceptable to throw the ball at a player's head from three feet.
I don't know
why it is acceptable to treat these little human beings with such contempt.
we don't do this to each other as adults,
why is this an acceptable way to teach a child?
So
why is it acceptable to go on about feeding your baby?
So
why is it acceptable for formula feeding mothers to be bombarded with insults under the guise of providing healthcare?
Why was it acceptable to look into whether the Executive was listing clients of his spouse, yet neither the county comptroller nor any other legislator was listing their clients?
Somebody explain to me, for example — just as a start --(1) why it's acceptable to use a uniform distribution in the context I describe above, and / or (2) how doing so is inconsequential to the predation «estimates.»
Why is it acceptable for skeptics to argue that poor historical correlations debunk current climate science?
The reason why it's acceptable to use Mauna Loa as a proxy for global CO2 levels is because CO2 mixes well throughout the atmosphere.
Why is it acceptable, asks the blogger Donna Laframboise, for the IPCC to «put a man who has spent his career cashing cheques from both the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and Greenpeace in charge of its latest chapter on the world's oceans?»
Why are they acceptable homes for law schools when TWU is apparently not?
So
why is it acceptable within the context of safeguarding our children.
Not exact matches
Ask them
why they prefer not taking breaks, and let them know it
's acceptable and encouraged to take advantage of the outlined
acceptable breaks in your organization.
Concerns over consumer acceptance of fermentation
is why food companies
are quick to equate it with accessible and
acceptable food processes like brewing beer or making bread.
One does not have to
be an animal rights activist to see
why this
is not an
acceptable option for the industry.
The incoming raw material, the production machinery, and other inputs, such as lubricants, must next
be examined to discover
why results
are trending in the wrong direction or fall outside the
acceptable range.
The first few years in business
is a test of anyone's mettle, which
is why you need to get really clear on what
is and isn't
acceptable to you.
According to the Insurance Institute, the head of the crash test dummy in the Model
S slammed into the steering wheel, which
is why IIHS only gave the popular electric car an «
acceptable» rating in the small overlap test.
As long as investors perceive valuations to
be acceptable, there
is no compelling reason
why the actual facts should get in their way over the short - term.
«If it
's not reasonable to hit another adult,
why should it
be deemed reasonable and
acceptable to hit a child?
And
why is it treason in some evangelical quarters to sign any theological document with a Roman Catholic with whom orthodox Protestants agree on Nicaea, while it
is quite
acceptable to rally together around «the gospel» with other evangelicals who disagree on the most basic thing of all — who God actually
is?
ME II beat me to it, but it
's unbelievable that you
are trying to rationalize slavery, regardless the of «type» and this
is why we view god as immoral while you still think god can
be moral and outline when it
's acceptable to own a slave.
5oo, ooo priests for 1.2 billion Catholics - There
is the answer to
why the abusing priests
were tolerated.The conclave elected exactly who they wanted to
be Pope - Someone who would not rock the boat.I believe Pope Benedict
was advised to retire in light of the Federal indictment pending so this would not involve a standing Pope and the possiblity of him
being found guilty.I further think this new election of Pope will allow the Church to change it
's stance on the very controvertial issues the Church
is facing ie.female priests
being one, the decisions appearing more
acceptable coming from a new head as opposed to reversed stance of standing Pope.This decision to retire, in the Churchs» view I believe
is damage control and not neccessarily Pope Benedict
's desire.If looked at for what it
is - A very slick maneuver indeed.
My point
is that if people have a problem with this edit, then
why was the first one
acceptable.
Ehud Barak's insouciant assurance that he can procure an
acceptable peace with the Arabs on his own terms has shown itself, at least to date, to
be a most imprudent policy» which
is why his position as leader of the nation
is, as I write, seriously in question.
God)
why couldn't those who feel the Not Guilty verdict
is acceptable... and feel that Zimmerman DID act in self - defense... and who feel that Martin
WAS the aggressor and was threatening Zimmerman's life... likewise say that a Higher Power DID step
WAS the aggressor and
was threatening Zimmerman's life... likewise say that a Higher Power DID step
was threatening Zimmerman's life... likewise say that a Higher Power DID step in?
Tell me Chad,
why is I don't know not
acceptable?
Why do you think, in the last 15 years, it
's kind of become
acceptable for a generation that
was raised to «just believe» to start openly embracing doubt as part of their faith journey?
If blowing up Arabs for various reasons
is okay,
why is physical action not
acceptable against people who kill innocent life?
Why are those alternatives more
acceptable to you?
If it
is acceptable,
why are there prescribed punishments for such behavior?
That
's why many Christians do not tolerate gay people but find prostitution more
acceptable.
Jeremy since we
are talking about satan casting out satan heres a question for you.Have you ever wondered
why Jesus helps satan at times or at least it appears that way.Mat 8:28 - 34 Why would he do that in the case of the demonic man the demons requested that Jesus cast them them into the pigs which he allowed it seems that not only did he help satan to have his way in destroying the pigs but destroyed the livelihood of the people in that area.You could argue at least it saved one man but is it acceptable to save one life but affect the lives of ma
why Jesus helps satan at times or at least it appears that way.Mat 8:28 - 34
Why would he do that in the case of the demonic man the demons requested that Jesus cast them them into the pigs which he allowed it seems that not only did he help satan to have his way in destroying the pigs but destroyed the livelihood of the people in that area.You could argue at least it saved one man but is it acceptable to save one life but affect the lives of ma
Why would he do that in the case of the demonic man the demons requested that Jesus cast them them into the pigs which he allowed it seems that not only did he help satan to have his way in destroying the pigs but destroyed the livelihood of the people in that area.You could argue at least it saved one man but
is it
acceptable to save one life but affect the lives of many?
What I don't understand
is why a difference of opinion
is only
acceptable if that difference supports your own belief.
This
is why we Atheists need to
be extremely vigilant in letting others know they
are not alone and that it
's beyond
acceptable to denounce your supersti.tion and begin to live as a human.
Why would it
be acceptable or even logical for the ones making the claim to place the burden of proof on the ones who
are discounting the claim?
This
is why we Atheists need to
be extremely vigilant in letting others know they
are not alone and that it
's beyond
acceptable to denounce your superst.ition and begin to live as a human.
Why is it not
acceptable to simply concede that I don't know whether a god exists or not, when I've seen no evidence to show there
is one nor have I seen any proof there isn't one?
If God believes that some coercion
is a useful and morally
acceptable means of achieving a desired end, then there appears to
be no reason
why such coercive power would not
be used if it
were available.
Why do they think it
's acceptable to baptize non-Mormons or anyone who
is not a Mormon while they
are living?
Why should it
be acceptable for christians, jews, muslims or others to convert people to their religion, but once a group of atheists speaks up it
is frowned upon?
Why is one magical
being they don't believe in
acceptable and other isn't?