Sentences with phrase «why leadership of»

This is why leadership of cultural change is a key theme throughout the book.

It is surprising to the ordinary foot soldier how and why the leadership of the minority is so much in a hurry to throw one of their own to the dogs.

After all, if religion were the main source of the conflict then one might wonder why the leadership of the nationalist community has not wavered in its cause while it has become more secular.

I can see why the leadership of the LDs Church wants to cut these people off.

«That's why the leadership of FedEx in logistics and transportation is critically important and serves as a lifeline to the people and communities still at risk.»

Not exact matches

In this exclusive interview with Inc., conducted over a long lunch in Chicago, John speaks candidly of the loneliness that comes with leadership, his hard - won understanding of why founders ignore their health — and the importance of a well - timed drink.

I started to wonder if there was any science behind why some employees get that highly coveted «halo effect», which in laymen's terms is their ability to seemingly do no wrong in the eyes of the company leadership.

«I consider myself a student of leadership and a student of the why.

I have been in the personal branding game for a long time, and for an audience that prides itself on making smart long - term investments, it confuses me why so few investors and venture capitalists see the value in building some element of thought leadership for themselves.

It's hard to believe that an author who has made a career of the «leadership» racket — with book titles such as Bad Leadership: What It Is, How It Happens, Why It Matters; and Reinventing Leadership: Making the Connection Between Politics and Business — would now be calling for its end.

That's why many entrepreneurs are interested in the new value of thought leadership.

As I mentioned in my closing ceremony speech, I truly believe Booth is a school of leaders, this world needs leaders capable of driving changes and that's why we all have to take a decisive leadership role.

Dr. Laub's work has been tested with over 1200 organizations, and continues to be at the forefront of research to answer the question «why do leadership structures fail so often?»

This is why it is so important for every leader to work hard to gain the qualities of great leadership.

«Why are there no people of color on your leadership team?»

More and more entrepreneurs are trying to tailor their leadership style to the movie version of Steve Jobs, and it's easy to see why.

Veteran entrepreneur Eric Ries talks about why the quickest path to a fast - growing company is through efficient leadership and constant evaluation of your goals.

To explain why this big gap in valuations isn't a sign of over-valuation, the CAPE's critics cite lots of individual issues in these nations that make them riskier bets than the U.S., such as looming Brexit in the U.K. and Germany's uncertainty regarding future leadership.

That's why leadership development is at the heart of our business.

Xerox has long assigned numbers to its employment objectives, which is perhaps why the company is setting its sights even higher: It is aiming for 34 % of the executive leadership team to be female within the next five years (up from 28 % currently), according to Damika Arnold, global diversity and inclusion leader at Xerox.

Marcus Lemonis, star of CNBC's «The Profit», explains why one of the biggest leadership challenges is learning how to be confident without having a big ego.

«Distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don't see equal representation of women in tech and leadership,» the unnamed engineer wrote in an essay that went viral within the company before leaking online.

In an onboard interview with The Tyee, May talked about where Via Rail has abandoned Canadian passengers, about why she's running in one of the most staunchly Tory ridings in the nation, and about how she might go after Prime Minister Stephen Harper in the upcoming leadership debates.

As president and CEO of Catalyst, an organization committed to expanding opportunities for women and business worldwide, I'm often asked why there are still so few women in senior leadership roles — like Meg Whitman, president and CEO of Hewlett Packard — and what forward - thinking men and women can do about it.

[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?

The SEC's corporate governance proposals call for increased disclosure about a company's «leadership structure» and an explanation as to why «the company believes it is the best structure for it at the time of the filing.»

On Tuesday, moments after finding out about the layoffs and leadership upheaval at the Downtown Project in Las Vegas, I asked Tony Hsieh by phone why he stepped down as leader of the utopian startup city he had founded, and why he had continued act as head of the ambitious experiment in the desert despite having already handed over the reins to his lawyer and a team of executives.

Since the House leadership hasn't provided any rationale why these provisions would be temporary and the economic case for temporary expensing in the current economic environment is quite small, it seems likely that the expiration date is intended to artifically reduce the cost of this bill and set up a costly extension later.

Given the absolute caning AMP has (deservedly) copped at the hands of Kenneth Hayne and Counsel Assisting at the Financial Services Royal Commission in Melbourne this week, why wouldn't the company's leadership renewal be the talk of the market?

This could be why little attention was paid to the Socred's annual general meeting in January 2016, where it appears that a group of anti-abortion activists staged a takeover the party leadership.

This is why, in strongly uptrending markets, we find it much easier and more profitable to focus on the price action and technical patterns of individual leadership stocks and ETFs, rather than paying much attention to whether or not the charts of the S&P, Nasdaq, and Dow are «overbought» (we hate that useless term).

Lori Casselman is the Chief Health Officer at League and explains why creating diversity of thought at the leadership level in the digital health space can #movethedial in organisations.

With this being the belief in the church and the family, why would someone raised with these beliefs practice differently in the leadership of our country?

I think some of the openly racist sign that certain TPers held up at rallies and the reluctance of the leadership to disown those people had more than a little to do with why those charges were leveled.

Why would any person who does not believe in Christian values attempt to apply for a position of leadership in a Christian group?

Avakian asks» in BAsics, chapter six, verse eleven» why he and his work are so important and explains that communism can't be reached «without leadership» leadership that, in relation to this goal, embodies the most advanced understanding and methodology» and what is concentrated in this person, yes, but most fundamentally in the body of work and method and approach of Bob Avakian represents that leadership.»

The purpose of my project was to unpack and explore the phrase «biblical womanhood» — mostly because, as a woman, the Bible's instructions and stories regarding womanhood have always intrigued me, but also because the phrase «biblical womanhood» is often invoked in the conservative evangelical culture to explain why women should be discouraged from working outside the home and forbidden from assuming leadership positions in the church.

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

I also hear from a lot of evangelicals who have begun attending Mainline Protestant churches precisely because they welcome LGBT people, accept scientific findings regarding climate change and evolution, practice traditional worship, preach from the lectionary, affirm women in ministry, etc., but these new attendees never hear the leadership of the church explain why this is the case.

Animpartial Observer — By saying» If this thread really is only about letting people speak their own truth, and not about exposing the bad behavior of the emergent leadership more broadly, then why even bring those stories up in the first place?»

If this thread really is only about letting people speak their own truth, and not about exposing the bad behavior of the emergent leadership more broadly, then why even bring those stories up in the first place?

I also hear from a lot of evangelicals who have begun attending Mainline Protestant churches precisely because they welcome LGBT people, accept science, avoid aligning with a single political party, practice traditional worship, preach from the lectionary, affirm women in ministry, etc. but these new attendees never hear the leadership of the church explain why this is the case.

In addition to general cultural dynamics, there are other reasons why large churches are more resistant to women's leadership; these reasons are related to some of the basic differences between small and large churches.

This explains why the innovative intellectual leadership required for revamping church history and reconceiving the teaching of history across the entire academic syllabus, both secular and theological, has been painfully slow in emerging.

After World War II, an American journalist returned to Germany to live in a remote town in hopes of discovering why law - abiding citizens followed the leadership of Adolf Hitler.

The question that Prof. Johnson might well ask himself is this: Why should the Church's leadership, or Catholics more generally, heed a putatively Catholic theologian who declares that the Church's official teaching is laughable or blasphemous and unworthy of serious consideration?

Beyond that there were doubts about the leadership and capacity of the Scottish Nationalists and of the other Scottish political parties; and there was also a dislike of the idea of separating Scotland from the rest of the U.K.: As it was often put, «Why break up the most successful political union of nations in modern history?»

(For more on why Jesus» choosing of the twelve male disciples should not exclude women from leadership see Daniel Kirk's post, «On Jesus Choosing Twelve Males»)

This is why American television must be reconstructed, and the leadership in that reconstruction must come in part from the religious institutions of the nation.

Why is it only evangelical churches have these kind of leadership failures?