Not exact matches
The argument for geoengineering goes like this: the world is getting inexorably
warmer; governments show no sign of drastically reducing greenhouse gas emissions, so
why not control the
planetary thermostat by finding a way to filter, block, absorb or reflect some of the sunlight hitting the Earth?
If global
warming is really a
planetary emergency,
why won't he deliver the same talk for $ 50,000?
It is rapidly expanding energy use, mainly driven by fossil fuels, that explains
why humanity is on the verge of breaching
planetary sustainability boundaries through global
warming, biodiversity loss, and disturbance of the nitrogen - cycle balance and other measures of the sustainability of the earth's ecosystem.
Now you need to decide if this amount (about 0.05 W / m2, or 50mW) is really important in explaining
why the Earth surface is
warmer than the
planetary emission temperature is.