Sentences with phrase «why social spending»

Not exact matches

She also points out that social media may be more corrosive to mental health than, say, gaming (which might also explain why girls, who tend to spend relatively more time on social networks, may be more adversely affected by the rise of smartphones).

In other words, why not have the government raise the GST to cover its contribution to health and social spending, and let the provinces deal with the serious budget problems they already have.

That's why it's so important to spend time researching link opportunities that are niche specific, network with others in the industry, get active in social media, and be on the lookout for guest blogging opportunities.

Musk's ability to use social media to drum up major Tesla awareness is likely one of the big reasons why Tesla spends only a fraction of the advertising cost of its competitors.

If you are 55 or under and hope to enjoy some of those benefits you have been paying into from your paychecks for the last 30 years, of which the Government has borrowed 5 trillion dollars for other spending such as defense and tax breaks for the rich, which is why the current social security system is in jeopardy, then you will be voting for Obama.

And why do social conservatives want to spend an eternal afterlife in a totalitarian socialist society of 127 Billion, mostly non-christians???

At the times it's felt like a chore, I've disconnected with social media, spent a few days eating for fun and reading my favorite cookbooks, and really re-centered on why I do what I do.

I do not wish to be rude but instead of fantasy proposals why not do as I have done and try your best to increase our fans efforts to rid us of Wenger, the board and Kroenke by a concerted social media campaign, by boycotting games and not buying merchandise and by those who will attend no matter what, to use huge banners and spend the whole game chanting anti-Wenger, the board and Kroenke songs.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Instead of spending the money on high paid social workers and legal systems to take these women's children away and place them in foster care, why can't we use that money for child care, parenting classes, decent housing, job training for single moms.

There is some truth in this argument, although it remains a mystery why it is better to cut social benefits rather than military spending at a time when the United States spend more money on defense than the next 10 military powers — such as China, Russia, France, England, Germany and Japan — combined.

And you need to spend a few months reading Rousseau's, «The Social Contract,» a fundamental work on why humans choose to establish government.

Ed Balls was right to commit to a # 10bn capital spending programme particularly directed at social housing construction, which would be good for job creation as well as meeting a large and growing social need, but he queered his pitch by saying he would accept the spending cuts Osborne is going to spell out on 26 June (why give a hostage to fortune when he doesn't even know what those cuts will be?)

That's why we have said we would have a cap on structural social security spending, so that government is alert to upward pressures on the benefits bill, and ensures problems are dealt with to keep the budget within limits.

The new findings, from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, the Harvard Global Health Institute, and the London School of Economics, suggest that common explanations as to why healthcare costs are so high — such as the notions that the U.S. has too many doctor visits, hospitalizations, procedures, and specialists, and spends too little on social services that could mitigate healthcare needs — may be wrong.

To summarize, most people spend too much time at work and too little socializing and this is why it is so difficult to meet new people and have a satisfying social life.

«You can spend all the money in the world in advertising, but if your social - media reputation is bad, why bother?»

Goldendoodle puppies are very social creatures — which is why it's important that they spend enough time with their mother and the rest of the litter before being separated to join a human family.

So, next time you book your holidays, or search for a tour or accommodation, why not have a think about how you can get the best social value from your spending and consider booking through one of these social enterprises in travel.

Blogging.com: Top Travel Bloggers Share Advice & Tips for Blogging — Apr 2018 Wendy Wu Tours: My Favourite Photo of India — Mar 2018 Boutique Travel Blog: 3 Unique Locations for the Perfect Spring Break — Mar 2018 flybmi.com: 5 ways to spend a weekend in Graz — Dec 2017 Boutique Travel Blog: Top 10 historic hotels in the British Isles — Nov 2017 Cruise 1st: A Day Tripper's Guide to Vienna: What to See and Do — Aug 2017 It's All About Italy Blog: Best Gelato and Granita in Sardinia — Aug 2017 Mr Abroad: 17 Experts Reveal Their Favorite Travel Hacks That You Should Know — Aug 2017 Boutique Travel Blog: Our Top 10 Favourite Boutique Hotels — Jul 2017 Podcast SL: My 10 Favorite Things About Aruba — Jul 2017 Doyle Collection: An Afternoon on Bristol Harbourside with Heather Cowper — Jul 2017 Globehunters: A Travel Blogger's Guide to Choosing A City Break Destination — Jun 2017 Cruise1st: 10 Essentials to Take in Your Bag on a Shore Excursion — Jun 2017 PreTravels: Top Summer Destinations: Travel Bloggers» Favourites — Jun 2017 Forbes: The 10 Best Places to Visit in Europe in 2017 — May 2017 Boutique Travel Blog: Top 6 food and drink tours in the UK — Apr 2017 PreTravels: Top Spring Destinations: Travel Bloggers» Favourites — Mar 2017 Magasinet Liv: 7 inspiring travel blogs from women traveling alone around the world — Mar 2017 Social Butterflies: Top tips for aspiring travel bloggers — Mar 2017 Boutique Travel Blog: Best spa hotels from around the world — Feb 2017 Boutique Travel Blog: Our Top 8 Hotels from a Year of Travel — Jan 2017 Staysure: Postcards From a Solo Traveller — Jan 2017 Trips100: Bloggers» (Anti) New Year's Resolutions — Jan 2017 TourRadar: Why A Rhine Or A Danube River Cruise Should Be Your Next Adventure — Dec 2016 HotTubHideaways: Best Places to Visit in England — Nov 2016 FeelGood Contact Lenses: Top Travel Essentials of Global Travel Bloggers — Nov 2016 Headwater: 6 tips for a perfect cycling holiday — Sep 2016 iFootpath: 10 Things to Pack for a Walking Holiday — Sep 2016 Headwater: Walking in Mahón: Menorca's capital — Sep 2016 Headwater: Lake District Greats: A Life in Literature — Aug 2016 Manchester Taxi Tours: What is it that brings millions of visitors to Manchester every year?

If the player can't easily answer why she should spend time interacting with a cooperative social feature, it probably isn't very well implemented.

So, why do I do spend a lot of my time engaging with the public via social media?

This is why we work closely alongside the highly qualified Pam Miller, a very experienced social worker who spends a great deal of her time providing the emotional support that our clients need and that we are not qualified to even think about giving.

The point is, before you put too much effort into actually using social media, spend some time deciding why you want to use social media for your law practice.

«Business owners are spending countless hours online but wiping out,» says Starr Hall, social media strategist and author of The Social Wave: Why Your Business is Wiping Out with Social Media and How to Fsocial media strategist and author of The Social Wave: Why Your Business is Wiping Out with Social Media and How to FSocial Wave: Why Your Business is Wiping Out with Social Media and How to FSocial Media and How to Fix It.