Not exact matches
Similarly, Gordon Chin, a project
scientist at NASA's Goddard
Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, proposed a mission that would explain
why the same chemical processes that destroy ozone in Earth's atmosphere stabilize carbon dioxide in Venus's.
Dean Pesnell, project
scientist for SDO at NASA's Goddard
Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., explained
why Comet ISON wasn't visible in SDO and what could be learned from that: SDO is tuned to see wavelengths of light that would indicate the presence of oxygen, which is very common in comets.
The research amounts to a «reasonable and clever» way to determine
why the beginning of the next solar cycle has been tardy, says
space scientist Nancy Crooker of Boston University in Massachusetts.
In a study published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters,
scientists from the University of New Hampshire and colleagues answer the question of
why NASA's Voyager 1, when it became the first probe to enter interstellar
space in mid-2012, observed a magnetic field that was inconsistent with that derived from other spacecraft observations.
And more broadly speaking, the Copernican principle, as
scientists have applied [it] ever since, is that when we are trying to understand how the universe works, it is good to assume that there is nothing special about the Earth and where it sits; that we're not in a particularly privileged
space and that's
why things work the way that they do.
Everything flying around
space is pretty weird, but this one is extra weird, which is
why astronomers are so excited about it — in fact, although
scientists first dubbed it a comet, they're now not even sure what it is.
We're looking at
why that is,» said sea ice
scientist Nathan Kurtz of NASA's Goddard
Space Flight Center.
There is a good reason
why scientists have focused on the energy that is emitted back to
space (i.e., the energy budget at the top of the atmosphere) and that is precisely the issue that you bring up: the energy budget at the surface is strongly influenced by convection and latent heat transfer.
The
scientists brought their 1.55 metre cores to the surface in 1993, but it has taken another two decades for laboratory techniques to detect and interpret the significance of radioactive particle samples in the rock that could only have come from outer
space — which is
why scientists think the bedrock must have been exposed, possibly more than once.