Sentences with phrase «why start it in the first place»

This passion is n`t for the faint at heart so we always have to ask ourselves why we started it in the first place.

Remembering why we started in the first place really helps to push forward.

It was starting to feel tedious, and I was losing the meaning behind why I started this in the first place.

but I do remind myself each time I doubt my blogging or myself of why I started in the first place.

You can't maintain a false persona indefinitely anyway, so why start it in the first place.

Instead of wallowing in self - pity, you will remember why you started this in the first place.

It validates why we started in the first place.

It takes a lot of discipline to step back and just do it for enjoyment — which is why I started it in the first place!

But this is more than technology, this is a game full of loveable characters, beautiful landscapes and unique gameplay features that have come together in a fun way that players enjoy playing, and that's the real reason why we started this in the first place.»

Not exact matches

That's why I started the team in the first place.

As the lovely James from Men with Pens and Damn Fine Words recently suggested I try, sit down with a pen and write out some «I Believe» statements on just why you started your journey online in the first place.

When you start a business, you want to focus your time on why you started your business in the first place, not managing your finances.

Revealing why you started your business in the first place can say a lot about your company and you as an entrepreneur.

This is allows an entrepreneur to briefly reflect on why he or she started a business in the first place.

You'll start with an understanding of why things catch on in the first place and how you can use those lessons to create viral content online.

Think back to the origins of your business and why you started it up in the first place.

Why did you start teaching in prisons in the first place?

Finally, ask yourself why you're seeking to start a business in the first place.

«One of the many reasons why we're so enthusiastic about this partnership is the philosophy of why we started this thing in the first place,» Tetrick says.

But they offer only a partial explanation for why fewer companies start in the first place.

Why did you start your company in the first place?

The benefits of measuring your content's impact: Remember why you started creating content in the first place — to achieve business goals, rather than content objectives.

Because if you're just using a Ouija board, and the market starts going against you for some period of time, you're stuck - either you continue to follow something when you have no idea why it should work in the first place, or now you've got to find something else that works even though you don't understand why.

Some people tend to put very low importance in thinking about why they want to start a business in the first place.

Thanks for making it, reminded me why I started questioning the idea of God in the first place.

Just let her go, I sort of like the comments she makes because a) they help illustrate the reason why atheists are around in the first place and why we must actually get up and say something and b) she sometimes starts stimulating conversation (obviously she doesn't mean to nor participates).

To start off, why don't you tell us a little about what drew you into humanitarian work in the first place and how you became associated with World Vision?

why don't you start with why humans invented religion in the first place, the origins of the books of the bible, the multiple «christ» (copied) stories throughout the history of time, fossil evidence of evolution of man and all species, all the discrepancies in the bible, knowledge of all the gods that humans have believed in through recorded history, the political uses of christianity in the time of it's origin, the fact that every other religion has followers who believe just as strongly in their own god / book, that fact that if you had been born in another part of the world you would be a different religion and going to «hell», and that a good, kind, omniscient god wouldn't allow all the suffering and evil to happen, and wouldn't need «help» as christians like to tout... and then we'll get to all these ridiculous fools.

When I started my blog and instagram account last year I started following way too many people, some because of their food, some for their lifestyle or creativity, some for the aesthetics... but recently I realized that I spend so much time scrolling through my feed, comparing, feeling bad about my work, my life or simply not good enough that I decided to unfollow quite a few of those accounts, keep only the ones that make me feel good and positive and to focus more on creating, shooting, baking, styling so basically all those things that make me happy and fulfilled and being the reason why I started doing this in the first place!

It's one of the main reasons why I started looking to using all these «alternative» flours and ingredients in the first place.

And so I rediscovered why it is that I got started baking with sourdough rye in the first place: the economics, the simplicity, the easy digestibility of the bread, and the versatility of a thin slice.

Their picky - ness and my desire to raise my family living a healthy lifestyle is why I started this blog in the first place.

But I also started worrying more about stats and SEO and less about why I started ExSloth in the first place.

This socialization theory explains possibly why people start eating chile in the first place, but in a non-chile-centered society, the reasons they continue to eat it are less clear.

Danny Duffy continues to thrive, increasing the chances he'll still be here for that next competitive club, and Jorge Soler starts to show fans why the Royals dealt for him in the first place.

The result is pretty damn funny — he got things off to a feisty start by asking why he was even competing in the RoC in the first place.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I am happy that I have made a considerable impact on other people's lives which is why I started volunteering in the first place.

Would love to know why you think Theo deserves that money seeing as 9 years after buying him he's not even nailed a starting place in the first 11.

I don't even know why he started Welbeck ahead of Walcott in the first place, Welbeck was giving away the ball too often on the right and wasn't helping Bellerin in defence.Bellerin too can't be blameless for being caught out of position many times, he didn't even know who he was marking.The reason why we lost the midfield battle wasn't because Coquelin didn't do much, the problem was with Ramsey and Cazorla, they were loosing possesion too often in our own half giving more room for counter attack Coquelin alone couldn't contain opponent's pressure for the full 90minutes he needed help too defencively from Ramsey who didn't give him any, Ramsey now sees himself as an AM who could go forward at anytime and ignore his defensive responsibility.Koscielny didn't do much to prevent the second goal.

never waste CAPITAL LETTERS on an article about Chambers at this juncture... I still can't believe that no one from management has ever explained why such a frugal club spent so much money on him in the first place... we haggle for months and years with clubs for players who could have a monumental impact on the very future of our club but somehow we found $ 16 million for someone who couldn't regularly crack a Southampton lineup (very fishy)... don't get me wrong, I like what he showed at times last season in Middlesbourogh but from the handful of games I watched him play I still have some serious questions about his consistency as a back - line player in the EPL; as such he should prove himself on loan for another season, making sure that he goes to a team that wants him in the starting 11... bottom line, let's not get bogged down with the semantics of peripheral players and focus on the real task at hand = figure out who the hell is going to be our starting 11 for the foreseeable future, which means getting contracts signed, getting rid of a lot of deadwood and bringing in talented players into the positions which truly need upgrading... the rest is just unnecessary noise

Are we even interested in Aubameyang in the first place??? Before we start asking why he chose City...

probably cuz, Ozil can become the best player in world, while Cazorla cant, when you are talking about stats, Ozil needs only 8 assists to take first place as player with most assists ever, thats why Ozil always starts, no matter Germany or Arsenal, personally i do nt like that, for me who is in better form would play, but it does nt work like that!!

On the surface, Newcastle's squad is largely made up of Championship quality players, however despite a shaky start on their return to the Premier League, experienced boss Rafa Benitez has handled his side with a real panache that highlights why he was such a coup for the Tyneside club in the first place.

And to be honest, this was why we started the whole thing in the first place!

Instead, think of a great number of reasons why he started to cry in the first place.

Remember, that love is the reason why you chose to be with each other and start a family in the first place, so it's important to make your marriage a priority.

In the end, my feeling about Today remains this: life is difficult enough in the first place, why on Earth would I want to start each day by listening to people fruitlessly yell at each otheIn the end, my feeling about Today remains this: life is difficult enough in the first place, why on Earth would I want to start each day by listening to people fruitlessly yell at each othein the first place, why on Earth would I want to start each day by listening to people fruitlessly yell at each other?

That's why the best strategy is not to start in the first place.»

For a start you're not questioning why working class socialist labour voters went Ukip in the first place, it wasn't some guardian reading, snobbery that the working class are think, therefore are bigoted, so they must vote UKIP as they're nasty right wingers who dint like immigration, the decrease in wages among blue collar workers, due to immigration, is by the bosses seeking immigration to pay lower wages to make themselves more profits, Appeasing implies going along with something through fear of something worse, to agree with controlling immigration, because ex labour voters are going UKIP isn't appeasing it, why would us being afraid of losing is our votes to.