Sentences with phrase «why would a reader»

Why would your reader read your blog?

Now, why would a reader borrow a $.99 (in which they are allowed only ONE loan a month), when they could borrow a much higher priced book and buy my book for less than a dollar?

If you make that clear, why would a reader turn down a free book, especially if it sounds like something they'd enjoy?

If the paper copy is just for floating advertising, why would a reader care what somebody once paid for the book?

In other words, why would their readers be interested?

And, why would a reader want to buy both an ebook and print book of the same title?

The most important question we're asking of submissions is: Why would a reader buy the next book?»

(And why would any reader buy something with simple still images when he could get video instead?)

Why would a reader buy books through this site, rather than, say, All Romance eBooks?

Why would any reader get excited about a «free» low - priced book, when they can get ANY book for free with this service.

Or why we have reader reviews online, yet don't trust them?

It's not what I intended when I started this, but I can understand why I have readers follow me and leave me.

or Syracuse, why have the reader wait to the bottom of your resume — or, worse the end of the second page — to see that you attended this fabulous school or that you both went to the same school.

Not exact matches

Veteran writer Shawn Tully, who has been expertly chronicling and analyzing the economy for Fortune readers for decades, digs into America's deficit spending and shows plainly why it could lead to disaster.

Once you have the reader's attention with hook material, then the introduction should show why the information in the book matters to them and why they should be paying attention.

That's why Fortune has put together a poll asking readers to weigh in on their choice for VC Mt. Rushmore.

Billionaire and avid reader Bill Gates has a new favorite book: «Factfulness: Ten Reasons We're Wrong About the World — and Why Things Are Better Than You Think.»

I'd be curious to hear from readers: Why do you think Amazon, Google, Facebook and Apple haven't been interested in cryptocurrency?

«Why then should the reader be interested in what you have to say?»

I can understand why there might be questions about something new that's different, but we've really tried to do it from the point of view of the publishers, and we believe that we can create an environments that's actually really great for the publishers, really great for the readers, and also really great for the advertisers.

I like to start off with a mini 1 - 2 sentence paragraph directly stating my point, so that the reader instantly knows what this email is about and why I've contacted them.

On Joe Nocera's blog, a reader known only as «Anonymous Banker» has an interesting treatise on why small companies with great credit can't get loans right now.

Many of our readers have reported unexpected reboots after updating their handsets to Oreo and Samsung has now confirmed that this is why it stopped the Galaxy S8 Android Oreo release.

That's why, although e-ink readers have come a long way since the original Kindle in 2007, there's still plenty of innovation to be done.

Once you have identified those places online, reach out to those sites and pitch them on why your infographic adds value to their readers.

Some writers have told our readers about their journey to their overseas home — how and why they chose their new retirement destination... how their lives have changed for the better... and what it is that they love about the place they now live in.

«As a long - time reader of both Jay Levinson's and Shel Horowitz's previous books, I have to keep wondering why I'm surprised to see such a remarkable collection of wisdom - busting innovative ideas, all in one place.

Along with influential readers like Musk and Harris, Wait But Why now has numbers any other startup blog would be envious of: A total of 31 million unique visitors and 87 million page views, with monthly averages of 1.6 million uniques and 4.6 million page views, according to Urban.

«I might lose whatever credibility I have with readers if I suggested flat out that a book centered around the subject of oil, written by an economist, was a page - turner, but I am willing to say with conviction that Why Your World Is About To Get A Whole Lot Smaller, by former CIBC Chief Economist Jeff Rubin, is a fantastically compelling read.

But even a cursory analysis of the study's methods makes you wonder why anyone would take such a finding seriously, let alone order a Quarter Pounder With Cheese to celebrate it, as many newspaper readers no doubt promptly went out and did.

They initially targeted urban millennial women, but the audience has grown to include a broader demographic (20 percent of Skimm readers are male), no doubt a reason why, when they closed their Series A funding at the end of last year, they raised more than $ 6.25 million from investors like RRE, Greycroft Partners, and Homebrew, as well as big names like Irving Azoff, the former chief executive of Ticketmaster, and even Chelsea Handler.

Recently I have received some requests from readers of this blog to take a step back and talk about what DGI actually is — and why I choose it to be my investment strategy.

That said, I completely understand why a blogger who is dependent on their website as an important source of income would make this trade - off in an effort to better connect with their readers.

Prompted by readers, I've looked before at how and why rates got so low.

Just for once why doesn't The Baltimore Sun's editorial board admit its political intolerance of any conservative views to its readers instead of pretending not to understand anyone else's lack of tolerance («Political civility: Where has all the tolerance gone?»

Why did the Daily Wire, conservative pundit Ben Shapiro's outlet, find that news worth covering in the first place, besides the schadenfreude the outlet knew it would provide conservative readers who don't like Hogg and his movement?

I hope that the distinctions to which I have pointed help the reader to see why that would be a mistake, and why we need a framework for sorting out these finer - grained but essential differences in the operations of knowing and valuing underlying persons» selfhood, membership, interpretations, and motivations.

In my defence, another reader rejoined that the real problem was «trying to explain to someone who has not yet got it how and why some of the things that Pope Francis has said, done or left unsaid and undone have disturbed and brought disquiet in the minds and hearts of loyal, practising Catholics.»

Do you have any reasons why the readers of your post should attempt to see things the way you do?

I am not sure if this answers the reader's question, but it does help explain what Jesus meant when He said, «My God, my God, why have You forsaken Me?»

If the reader has some role in creating the authorial «intention'then why must one suppose that such an extraction originates fully from the authors / Bible and not from the readers?

Yet she is not mentioned again — not in Acts, not in the various epistles, not in earliest martyrology — and that is doubtless why in succeeding generations readers, hungry for a more detailed picture of this woman rumored from the first to have been something «special» to Jesus, have given her the characteristics and experiences of other Marys and unnamed biblical women.

Before dismissing the above fantasy too quickly, let the reader think about why it is that our society seems so little concerned over female homosexuality, has regarded it so lightly, and has no idea of the amount of female sexual activity engaged in by women who are not admitted homosexuals.

Perhaps the reader may wonder why there has not been included among these steps what is often regarded as the most distinctive note in prayer — wordless, inward communion.

Nor did it occur to Marcus to write his book for Jewish readers anyway; what he put together was a narrative of the mighty works and death of Jesus — a book largely devoted to explaining why Jesus had died — and he wrote it, not for Jews, but for Gentile converts and «listeners to the word.»

The reader may have wondered why I have not yet said much about human sinfulness.

We would expect an argument that informs his readers just exactly why his «progressive» friends are so wrong on this issue and the right wing «pro-life extremists» are right.

We had never understood why such theories appeal to some people, but our reader suggests a reason.

Once this hurdle is over, the reader will find this an excellent book which explores, with great sensitivity and understanding, the question of what it means to be human, why each human person has great value and importance, and why the frail and gravely ill matter just as much as the rest of us.

Some readers may wonder why the scientists won't admit that there are mysteries beyond our comprehension, and that one of them may be how those complex animal groups could have evolved directly from preexisting bacteria and algae without leaving any evidence of the transition.