You get guys like Nye, et al, who in their defense of evolution, make
these wide sweeping claims that belief in creationism is somehow going to undermine the very foundations of science.
Be very specific Chad, your credibility is near nil anyway, but when you make such
a wide sweeping claim, you'd best be able to defend it.
On the contrary, I should
claim, what I have been saying is metaphysical in the second sense of the word which I proposed in an earlier chapter; it is the making of
wide generalizations on the basis of experience, with a reference back to verify or «check» the generalizations, a reference which includes not only the specific experience from which it started but also other experiences, both human and more general, by which its validity may be tested — and the result is not some grand scheme which
claims to encompass everything in its
sweep, but a vision of reality which to the one who sees in this way appears a satisfactory, but by no means complete, picture of how things actually and concretely go in the world.