Sentences with phrase «wide they should go»

But I think those December dates have more in mind than just simple voting strategy: A lot of these films are opening in limited release and waiting on high - profile nominations in December and January in order to determine how wide they should go, or whether they should go wide at all.

Not exact matches

A company - wide PR plan doesn't need to go into specific details, but it should contain enough information to be a valuable resource.
Better still, it should explain how you're going to accomplish that goal (IKEA's says «We shall offer a wide range of well - designed, functional home furnishing products at prices so low that as many people as possible will be able to afford them»).
They should be able to hold their own when the Pats go five - wide on third - and - six, and if they can pressure Brady and get him uncomfortable, the Jags have a shot to win outright.
I've narrowed it down to 15 essential CEO skills, but CEOs should go into the job with a wide base of knowledge.
But there are major bets in place, and you should go in with eyes wide open.
It is commonly said that Joseph died fairly young and that Jesus had to take upon himself the support of Mary and of his younger brothers and sisters, and that not until they were old enough to take the business on their own shoulders, did he feel free to leave Nazareth and go into the wider world.
However, if you should begin to feel that - in the words of your reply to Mr Skarpa - «the debate is going nowhere», just let me know: I too have a concern for the patience of the wider readership.
Petition covers a wide range of elements, but should at the least include prayer not only for forgiveness but for wisdom and strength to go forward in closer fellowship with God and obedience to his will.
On the contrary, I should claim, what I have been saying is metaphysical in the second sense of the word which I proposed in an earlier chapter; it is the making of wide generalizations on the basis of experience, with a reference back to verify or «check» the generalizations, a reference which includes not only the specific experience from which it started but also other experiences, both human and more general, by which its validity may be tested — and the result is not some grand scheme which claims to encompass everything in its sweep, but a vision of reality which to the one who sees in this way appears a satisfactory, but by no means complete, picture of how things actually and concretely go in the world.
But the more commonly heard suggestion is that proceeds from the dividend should go to any of a wide variety of social programs: AIDS research, day care, education, drug control, medical care, public housing, environmental protection, repair of the nation's infrastructure.
Just goes to show that you should expose your children to a wide variety of foods, because you never know what foods they will absolutely love.
Tomas Pietrangeli, Managing Director of Arla Foods UK, commented: «We're hoping that consumer research will suggest this should go to a wider trial.
It was a miracle Michigan won, and a lot of credit should go to the wide receivers who came up big when it mattered most.
If a referee is going to let a wide receiver toss a corner aside to make a catch, then that is exactly what that receiver should do.
We should have been level nine minutes later when Bellerin did really well to keep the ball from going out and find Giroud in the middle, but the big Frenchman somehow managed to put his header wide.
he was in a catch 22 situation... didn't know if should track his man on his wing... cos if he went straight to block Austins shot as well, then Austin would've passed the ball wide and same result.
Franks may have gone 8/12 for 117 yards, but 77 of those yards came on the two wide open gimmick plays to Jefferson and McGriff (and the throw to Jefferson should have been an easy TD if not for an errant throw).
Even the positive parts of his comments, the insistence that he'd have to run everything past the FA and the assertion that the days of being able to buy managers and players are gone, sit within the wider sense that this is not a conversation the FA would want to be happening, and not a conversation that Allardyce should be allowing to happen.
Just in case the safety decides to go with the over route, the comeback should keep the corner to that side occupied, which means the deep seam route would be wide open.
Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!
Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off
These reus articles are really boring and annoying, the lad is not coming to arsenal get over it, we have enough wide attacking options anyway, I will say though that he shouldn't go to Madrid though imo, he's class but I can't see him dislodging any of Madrids front three anytime soon, especially with him being injury prone, think it would be very bad for his career in the long run
Problem last night seemed to be that the midfield did not create space or make any kind of penetrating runs through the middle or out wide or even know where each other were or should be, resulting in sideways or backward possession with no threat going forwards.
Our squad is wide and rather good, but some players should go on a loan, others replaced due to age.
After a failed attempt to get Mark out of the 18 - foot deep and 10 - foot wide hole with a ladder, one member of his foursome went down into the hole and helped hoist Mark, who had a separated shoulder, up to the ladder and out of the cave.
Smashing the woodwork three times, shots defleted narrowly wide, rebounds going straight to defenders or their keeper and penalty claims going begging, while the opposition has two shots on target and score twice while both should have been disallowed.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
We were a bit slow to get going after the restart though and Benteke should have done better when he shot wide from a good position.
As reported by the Daily Mail, the former striker has gone even further by suggesting that the gap between Sterling and Ozil is so wide that we should not even have to discuss which is better.
Dennis Cherysev is not needed but i do nt know why people call him average when some here accept Giroud is just below world class or to some he actually is.If Cherysev was a cf i would have taken him over Giroud anyday.Karim Benzema is not coming because Real Madrid will not sell for any reason.I would love to see how Cazorla at no. 10 and Ramsey playin next to Coquelin will look like.To me i believe the playing of Ramey out wide severally has affected his form.To me when on form he is better than Cazorla in that role.Cazorla should be playing no. 10 but its because je keeps the ball well thats why people want him playing behind.Cazorla expresses himself best at no. 10 and that is the only truth.There will surely be some matches where Cazorla in box to box will not be going very well.He needs to go back to his former position.
«I think there's a view that we should get rid of the aerodynamics and have big, wide tyres and then get the grip mechanically and then we can go back to cars racing each other.
players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes
Danny Welbeck is fit enough for the bench and I would have expected him to start but Wenger has gone for Ozil in the wide forward role, with Cazorla in the number 10 position, so with Alexis on the other side of the in form Giroud, there is plenty of pace and guile in our attack and with Liverpool having to replace the suspended Skrtel with the former Gunner Kolo Toure, we should give them plenty of problems.
I should go ahead and say that Funchess is not going to be a wide receiver on the next level.
drogba will start for them no oscar debuchy was bad against reading not match fit bellerin should start he is playing brilliantly and if ramsey is gonna start wide he will offer width on the right
Wenger made his second change to bring Belletrin on for the Ox and we had 15 minutes to go and it should have been clear daylight when Ozil found Welbeck at the far post but he put his header wide.
He then goes on to say that Sanchez should not be a wide player because his energy is used up running up and down the flank.
Wenger has turned good wide players into top strikers before as well, so do you think he should go for it again with Welbeck?
Whether it was his personal choice to go out wide so Kane is the lone striker, or instructions from the manager, it should never, ever be done again.
Spurs should have gone in front eight minutes later when Josh Lillis could not hold a Son shot but the forward dithered when the ball came back to him and, when he eventually found Fernando Llorente, the striker shot wide with the keeper stranded but defenders on the line.
After all it's not like we have much to play for in the league and so to my mind the remaining games of this season should be focused on a) blooding younger players who could potentially plug gaps — like Reiss Nelson as a possible wide player, and b) having a go at getting a settled and sorted team with players who understand each other's position in readiness for next season.
It is probably something we should look at as an alternative option, because Bellerin and Monreal / Kolasinac have a lot more burden on them with no overlapping wide men, but personally I think we should be experimenting with the four superstars we have this season to see if we can at least have that as a selection choice as we go into next season.
Fabio Borini saw a couple of chances go begging but Stewart Downing should have made it three earlier on when his great run ended with a shot trickling inches wide.
Cleveland Browns wide receiver Josh Gordon went back and forth last month about whether the Cleveland Browns should take Texas A&M quarterback Johnny Manziel or Louisville's Teddy Bridgewater with the No. 4 overall pick in the NFL draft.
With Alexis Sanchez roaming too much from the centre - forward position and Arsenal making individual errors with some slack passing, PSG were able to build up a head of steam, and should have gone 2 - 0 up when Cavani rounded Ospina but shot wide from the edge of the box.
If all goes according to plan, Ponce's strength, athleticism and wide bag of tricks should make him both a shot taker and shot maker, which could portend a long and productive career.
There's a wide spectrum of what «letting yourself go» means, and from my experience as a twice - married and divorced woman, I will say here's what I've observed — most of us are totally capable of losing weight, exercising more and looking better once we're divorced and perhaps looking for new love, which is why I say we should all act like we're divorced in our marriage (again, tongue - in - cheek).
By four months, however, you shouldn't be putting her down drowsy; you should be laying her down wide awake so she learns how to go from wide awake to fast asleep alone.
Unlike other carriers which have narrow straps or go across one shoulder, the Moby Wrap is a wide piece of fabric that is
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z