cautions that the institutionalizing of ADR without attempting to change underlying culture will likely lead to a corruption of ADR mechanisms and
the wider civil justice system as there remains the possibility that good settlement process will be marred by over zealous advocacy or over zealous desire to close cases.
Not exact matches
[1] The argument is that if the
civil legal aid
system [2] is viewed by the middle class as a program that could benefit them if they encounter trouble, rather than being only for the poor, a
wider segment of the public will have a stake in access to
justice and they will support higher levels of public funding.
It is
wide - ranging covering a disparate group of questions on
civil justice from the place of employment tribunals in the court
system to enforcement of
civil judgments.
This trend is having a
wide - ranging impact on the
justice system, as documented by the National Self - Represented Litigants Project and the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family M
justice system, as documented by the National Self - Represented Litigants Project and the Action Committee on Access to
Justice in Civil and Family M
Justice in
Civil and Family Matters.
Overwhelming majorities of voters believe it is important to «ensure that everyone has access to the
civil justice system» and «strongly support a
wide range of services to enhance access.»