What they fail to understand is that their argument stems from a shortsighted view of a longer - running trend that started BEFORE
widespread use of fossil fuel and BEFORE human CO2 production increased.
Not exact matches
Elon Musk is very enthusiastic in pushing for the
widespread use of solar energy to replace
fossil fuels, so it was no surprise that the Tesla continues to focus on improving its technology for energy storage — if the car manufacturer's gigafactory is any indication
of that.
«Exxon's «Lights Across America» website advertisement states that natural gas is «helping dramatically reduce America's emissions» even though natural gas is a
fossil fuel causing
widespread planetary warming and harm to coastal cities like San Francisco and the
use of natural gas competes with wind and solar, which have no greenhouse gas emissions.»
In 1977, Black told Exxon's management committee
of top executives that emerging science showed that carbon dioxide levels were rising, likely driven by
fossil fuel use, and such increases would boost global temperatures, leading to
widespread damage.
One way or another, there is no long term future whatsoever for humanity that does not involve the complete eradication
of widespread, industrial scale,
use of fossil fuels.
Several climate models that scientists
use to understand the impact
of carbon emissions from sources such as the burning
of fossil fuels and
widespread deforestation have linked changes in atmospheric chemistry with bumps in tree growth.
Elon Musk is very enthusiastic in pushing for the
widespread use of solar energy to replace
fossil fuels, so it was no surprise that the Tesla continues to focus on improving its technology for energy storage — if the car manufacturer's gigafactory is any indication
of that.