Finally, the trial court properly found wife had waived her 5th Amendment privilege against self - incrimination by testifying that she had been a faithful and dutiful
wife during the marriage in response to a general question.
Ironically, it also found that jewelry Husband had given
Wife during the marriage was not marital property but was Wife's separate property.
Husband also successfully argued that the jewelry he had given
Wife during the marriage was marital.
Not exact matches
Just 14 percent want to see his current
wife Camilla, Diana's nemesis
during their
marriage, as queen.
What does Trump's
wife think about the multiple allegations that her husband sexually harassed and assaulted women, incidents that reportedly occurred
during their
marriage?
During a temple
marriage the man is given his
wife's heavenly name, which he is required to use to call his
wife into heaven.
My
wife and I lost three boys to miscarriage
during the first 10 years of our
marriage.
God never said anything about
marriage is about one man and one woman!!!! In fact,
during Jesus's time, it was quite normal for 1 man to have multiple
wives.
These included — how to deepen a
marriage relationship neglected
during frantic child - rearing, getting - ahead years; maintaining self - esteem in the midst of increasing evidence of aging; coping with stresses of «adolescing children»; dependency and death of parents; menopause; the emptying nest;
wives» need to develop new satisfactions as children leave.
My
wife commented
during the closing group evaluation that it made us feel pleased (as well as slightly jealous) to see them communicating at a level, after a few years together, that it had taken us much longer to reach in our
marriage.
Affleck alluded to the effort he and his
wife were making to keep their
marriage together
during his acceptance speech for Argo's Best Picture Oscar in 2013.
«
During 18 years of
marriage, with children, I've learned that if a woman gives up an aspect of herself — either the woman in her, the mother, or the
wife — the other two facets will suffer.»
The majority of voters surveyed in a new poll think Trump has cheated on his
wife, first lady Melania Trump,
during their 13 - year
marriage.
But he has gay friends — memorably living with a gay couple
during his divorce from his second
wife, Donna Hanover — and also once said the GOP should «move on» from the divisive issue of same - sex
marriage and get out of people's bedrooms.
It transpires that his
wife Patty Barreiro had declared bankruptcy twice, once
during the
marriage itself.
Shah did amass two or three other
wives during this period, but of all his
wives, he only loved Mumtaz; the other
marriages were political.
Apparently
during the course of the French couple's
marriage, the
wife was chatting with men on a Belgium - based social network and singles site called «Netlog» and sent intimate photos to some of the men she was communicating with.
During his first
marriage, Spike discovered that his
wife of 13 years had been cheating on him with his best friend.
What Harding endured
during her
marriage is that of the abused
wife with no self esteem and no where to go, so you go back to the abuser.
Other «rooms» of this project include the Museum Shop (first shown at S.M.A.K. in Ghent, Belgium, 1999), Museum Restaurant (W139, Amsterdam, 1999), Game Room (Le Pavé Dans La Mare, Besançon, France, 1999), Library of the Museum (Witte de With Centre for Contemporary Art, Rotterdam, 2001), Salon (Palais de Tokyo, Paris, 2002), and the
Marriage Room, where the artist married his
wife during its first presentation at the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam, 2000.
He has collaborated with his curator
wife Emilia (a distant cousin: they met in Moscow
during childhood) since their
marriage in 1992, and together they create powerful, imposing installations such as The Palace of Projects, a 40 - foot spiral structure that had its debut at the Roundhouse, in London, 10 years ago.
In light of that spending, the
wife claimed the husband had recklessly depleted his share of family funds
during the
marriage.
The agreement reached between the husband and
wife on the property acquired
during the period in which they are under contract of
marriage and on the prenuptial property is binding on both parties.
If husband and
wife agree, as is known to the third party, to separately possess their property acquired
during their
marriage life, the debt owed by the husband or the
wife to any other person, shall be paid off out of the property separately possessed by him or her.»
«So far as the property acquired
during the period in which they are under contract of
marriage and the prenuptial property are concerned, husband and
wife may agree as to whether they should be in the separate possession, joint possession or partly separate possession and partly joint possession.
They had lived in Switzerland
during the six year
marriage but also had a home in England in which the
wife remained living with the parties» three children following separation.
Bodey J agreed with the
wife's position and made an award of # 5m to the husband, holding that in light of the parties» modest standard of living
during the
marriage the award more than met the husband's needs, generously assessed, and would allow him to purchase a property in central London for # 2m and to achieve an income of # 130,000 per annum on a Duxbury basis.
Wife testified at the evidentiary hearing about the parties» standard of living, the history of employment
during the
marriage, and illness and disability benefits.
If you had the good fortune to be male, you could ask for a divorce under s. 27 of the 1857 Divorce and Matrimonial Causes Act on the basis that your
wife had committed adultery at some point
during your
marriage.
There are two kinds of spousal privileges, one being the communication privilege pertaining to communication inspired by the marital relationship and confidentially disclosed between husband and
wife and applicable to criminal and civil cases: this privilege is strong, and survives death or divorce as long as the communication was
during the
marriage, and...
Wife testified that
during the parties» 8 1/2 year
marriage she helped Husband in the lifeguard business.
Wife's financial expert concluded the marital portion of Husband's earnings
during the
marriage was $ 551,878 and conservatively estimated the value of Lifeguards at $ 1.1 million and attributed $ 500,437 to a «marital allocation.»
They are fighting for an approach to marital property that would give a husband and
wife equal control and ownership over property obtained
during the subsistence of the
marriage during marriage, and half the value -LSB-...]
It also disagreed with the family court's determination that
Wife's circumstances had changed so substantially
during the
marriage that it was no longer equitable to enforce the agreement, as:
The clientalleged that the lawyer should have advised him to negotiate a «downside protection clause,» so that, if his income did not increase
during the course of the
marriage, he would not be obliged to make any equalization payment to his
wife.
In a recent case called Regnier v. Regnier, the court considered a narrow issue: whether a
wife's decision
during the
marriage to go back to school automatically meant that the husband suffered financial disadvantage, for which he should be compensated by way of spousal support....
«The
wife argues, in part, that the trial court erred in awarding the husband 70 % of the parties marital assets, which, she says, were accumulated
during their 25 - year
marriage.
Wife lived in cooperative housing at a standard of living far below that which she was accustomed to
during the
marriage.
The court had awarded the
wife half of a particular stock that had been acquired
during the
marriage and did not consider the stock that had been acquired before the
marriage.
The agreement made no provision for spousal support in spite of the fact that the
wife was economically disadvantaged by the role she assumed
during the
marriage (homemaker and primary caregiver of the 3 children) and by the breakdown of the
marriage;
Marital Agreement Marital Agreement This is the agreement concluded
during your
marriage to stipulate the ownership of your marital assets, rights and duties shared by both you and your
wife / husband.
Lawyer negotiates $ 50,000 lump sum alimony payment to
Wife despite claim of adultery
during marriage in contentious divorce case.
The husband received one half of the capital value of the two properties (his share was # 1.3 million) and was provided with an additional award amounting to # 700,000 to reflect a combination of the following 3 factors: «(a) the standard of living enjoyed
during the
marriage; (b) the need for a modest capital fund in order to live in the property that he is to retain; and (c) some share in the assets held by the
wife» (see paragraph 114)
In addition, the
wife could not have purchased the structured settlement herself given that individuals can not purchase structured settlement annuities, and thus it could not be said that the
wife had actual possession or control of this part of the settlement money
during the
marriage); and
In a marital dissolution action, the husband argued that the
wife's shares in a corporation she co-owned with her father were community property because the
wife, GMSR's client, acquired them
during marriage and a corporate document stated that she had provided half of the consideration
The
wife was injured
during the
marriage and received a settlement.
Wife, a former successful international banking and finance lawyer at a major law firm, claimed that
during the
marriage, husband, also a successful lawyer, hid marital assets worth millions of dollars.
During their 26 year
marriage, the first
wife, now 80, had never worked outside the home and, when in 2008 — 24 years after their divorce — the man, now 71, asked Quebec's Superior Court to reduce his alimony payments (which were, at the time, $ 2,911 per month), he said his financial situation had changed due to his recent retirement, and downturns in the global markets.
The Supreme Court of Canada on Wednesday ruled in two cases centring around men who wanted to stop paying support to their former
wives, neither of whom had worked outside the home
during their
marriage.
With that vantage - point, it could not be said that
during the
marriage the
wife «received» the $ 300,000 used for the structured settlement.