Not exact matches
My company pension plan offers me the option
of taking a
lump sum of about $ 775,000 or a monthly annuity
payment of $ 3,600 that would go to me or my
wife as long as either
of us is still alive.
Among other things, the consent order provided for the husband, who was the applicant in the proceedings before Hildyard J, to make a
lump sum payment of # 450,000 to the
wife, who was the respondent.
Lawyer negotiates $ 50,000
lump sum alimony
payment to
Wife despite claim
of adultery during marriage in contentious divorce case.
In light
of this and other developments, the
wife applied to a motions judge for an order that his ongoing child and spousal support obligations be converted to a
lump -
sum amount in the same amount as the equalization
payment would have been, i.e. $ 50,000.
Despite being a common - law
wife, she sought alimony for herself in the amount
of $ 56,000 per month and $ 50 million as a
lump sum payment.
The district judge at first instance awarded the
wife a
lump sum of # 456,000 to capitalise her periodical
payments arrived at using the following calculation:
In making its order, the Court specified that the passage
of time alone would not satisfy the order and that the order only lapsed upon the
payment in full
of the
wife's share
of the matrimonial property which, at the husband's discretion, could be paid in one full
lump sum.
The judge adopted this approach and the
wife was awarded the former matrimonial home and a
lump sum of # 2.2 m. On appeal, the husband argued that the
lump sum payment should be reduced to # 1.5 m.