The framing of a husband and
wife relationship in terms of love — the kind of delightful, playful love found in the Song of Songs — completely changes things... So, too, if we frame our relationship to the Bible in terms of authority, we will inevitably have authoritarian issues emerging as theology.»
Not exact matches
During a meeting between Kim and a South Korean envoy
in March, Asahi Shimbun reported that Ri referred to Kim as «my husband,» marking a major shift
in language deliberately potentially used to normalize the
relationship between the leader and his
wife.
In the case of my
wife's luxury - car dealership, the high scores have no
relationship to whether or not she will buy her next car there.
American Media Inc., the company that owns the tabloid, agreed to pay $ 150,000
in August to Karen McDougal, who allegedly had a consensual romantic
relationship with Trump
in 2006, while he was married to his
wife, Melania, the Journal reported, citing interviews with McDougal's friends, who say she told them about the affair.
My
wife dropped a bunch of hints (e.g. «How did I suddenly land
in a 1950's
relationship?!»)
The fact is, while the term «office
wife» has seen a revival, these sorts of fraught
relationships between men and women have always been present
in the workplace.
In fact, a film called The Office Wife was made in 1930 depicting these complicated relationship
In fact, a film called The Office
Wife was made
in 1930 depicting these complicated relationship
in 1930 depicting these complicated
relationships.
Summary: «Tom's
wife died a year ago and he's bringing up his two daughters, living
in a beautiful gated community, with close friends nearby and a new
relationship starting.
Defense attorneys pointed to Tamerlan's
relationship with his
wife to demonstrate his ability to influence his younger brother Dzhokhar, as they began their case Monday
in the sentencing phase of Dzhokhar's trial.
And that
in response to what I have said about knowing our part
in the kingdom, trusting God for justice and the privelidge it is to be part of that, you see different roles for the husband and
wife in the
relationship,
in that it requireds a huband to «woo» to use an old fashioned word, his
wife by being sacrificual and that engendering
in her the submission
in a spirit of mutual submission.
Wives may not feel the pressure to determine what kind of men their husbands will become, but instead, they focus on the
relationship and their happiness
in it.
If I detect any lack of respect between the
wife and the husband, then I know the
relationships is
in serious trouble.
As far as his young
wife, we have no idea of evaluating what the customs were
in those days and how
relationships were forged.
Also
in the name of God, he commanded his first
wife to accept his polygamous
relationships or she would go to hell (D&C 132).
That's quite sweet
in a way — it takes all the responsibility off of you and puts it on God — name another
relationship like this you know about
in real life (whether with family, friends, or
wife)?
I also thought that born again Spirit filled persons can not have demons until a co Pentecostal pastor ask me to assist him
in delivering his
wife from demons that had entered her after she involved herself
in a lesbian
relationship.
Rather, she explores the complex of emotions that beset a woman seeking to navigate the unpredictable waters of contemporary
relationships — sleeping with a married man who
in turn has an unfaithful
wife («Don't think of me»); longing for a lover who slipped away without saying good bye («My lover's gone»), vaunting one's independence whilst yearning for some permanent connection («My life»), feeling deeply uncomfortable with oneself: «I just want to feel safe
in my own skin.»
As St Paul says
in Ephesians 5, the more that the husband
in his
relationship with his
wife reflects the sacrificial love of Christ for His bride the Church, and the more that the
wife in her
relationship with her husband reflects the self - giving love of the Church for her Bridegroom, the more they will be truly fulfilled and the more they will live up to what they are called to be.
I learned about equality even from Paul, who taught that with the resurrection, something radical had changed — not merely ontologically, but functionally —
in the
relationships between slaves and masters, Jews and Gentiles, men and women, rendering those whose identity was once rooted
in hierarchy and division brothers and sisters
in Jesus Christ instead; who put a radical gospel - spin on the Greco - Roman household codes, breaking down the hierarchies so that slaves and masters,
wives and husbands were charged with submitting «one to another» with the humility of Jesus as their model; who taught that power was overrated and that service will be rewarded; who surrounded himself with women he called «co-workers.»
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and
wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching
in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «
wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant
in one moment, but important enough to display
in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender
relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
Rey i assume your married but is your
relationship about the dos and donts its about showing your love to your
wife not rules if it is theres something wrong.
In the same way with Jesus its about the
relationship we want to please him
in what we think what we do so that we give him the glory.brentnz
What makes the New Testament household codes powerful and countercultural is that they actually challenge those hierarchies by instructing all members of the household — even the masters, who
in that culture held unilateral authority over their slaves,
wives, and children — to imitate Jesus Christ
in their
relationships by modeling his self - sacrificing love.
FYI — re spiritual / legal
wife — I would not equate this with polyamory as this
relationship structure has been explained to me by people
in sex positive cultures.
Inheritance
in Islam is based on the blood
relationship of parents, brothers and sisters, and children, and on the marriage
relationship of husband and
wife, without regard for sex or age
in the right of inheritance.
The husband -
wife relationship illustrates the complimentary and unity -
in - diversity that characterizes God's own nature as One Being who exists eternally
in three Persons.
In the same direction, short - term marriage counseling can be useful in assisting the alcoholic and his wife to adjust to the demands of sobriety and to make their relationship more mutually satisfying and fulfillin
In the same direction, short - term marriage counseling can be useful
in assisting the alcoholic and his wife to adjust to the demands of sobriety and to make their relationship more mutually satisfying and fulfillin
in assisting the alcoholic and his
wife to adjust to the demands of sobriety and to make their
relationship more mutually satisfying and fulfilling.
She's the most amazing person and her
relationship with her
wife is so steeped
in unconditional love, peace and joy, that I CAN NOT judge her for it.
Sexual
relationships between a husband and a
wife can participate
in the meaning of communion that reaches the edges of holiness and has something of the nature of a sacrament about it.
It can hardly be called discrimination, he reasoned, to say that a husband and
wife have a «unique and singular»
relationship or to say that children - and thus the state - benefit from being brought up
in a stable home with a father and a mother.
The personal
relationship of husband and
wife plays an increasingly important role
in all cultures.
As psychiatrist Lawrence Kubie says, «A major source of unhappiness between husband and
wife is to be found
in the discrepancies between their conscious and unconscious demands on each other and on the marriage, as these are expressed first
in the choosing of a mate and then
in the subsequent evolution of their
relationship.»
In helping to satisfy the partner's need for security, husband and wife can both help to satisfy their own need to be needed, to have something to give in the relationshi
In helping to satisfy the partner's need for security, husband and
wife can both help to satisfy their own need to be needed, to have something to give
in the relationshi
in the
relationship.
I'm trying to find anyway that the
relationship between my
wife and I will be affected if two people who are already
in a loving
relationship get to have the same civil rights that I enjoy.
Only after both have eaten does disorder appear
in their
relationship, for when Yahweh God calls them to account, Adam blames his
wife and Eve blames the serpent.
(14) The sensuality and abandon
in the description of Kovalana's
relationship with his mistress Madhavi
in this epic, provide a strong counterpoint to the tenderness and uxorious dependability of his
wife, Kannaki.
But I have also started to see
in my marriage to my own
wife, that unless you believe that your
relationship can get better, and work toward that goal, it will only get worse.
I recently was approached by a
wife in our church that I do not have a close
relationship with and never have.
In the last chapter, the husband's new experience of his
wife's presence was explained as a radical new
relationship that she had assumed to the world through death.
Sure, these people know Tony professionally, but none of them have been
in an intimate
relationship with Tony (other than his «spiritual
wife»).
This sense of the word is best illustrated
in Hosea, where the ghastly double rupture of marriage and covenant is
in prophetic consciousness a fait accompli, and where the prophet draws an analogy between the
relationship of husband and
wife and that of Yahweh and his people.
Housework increases substantially and fatigue plus the new responsibilities may cause problems
in the husband -
wife relationship.
Finally, the totality of Israel's rebelliousness is,
in the prophetic understanding, the shocking betrayal of Israel's pride and arrogance, which appear all the more reprehensible against the background of such
relationships as father / son, owner / vineyard, and husband /
wife:
My
wife will tell you that I am at my best when I am
in quality friendship
relationships.
She is my
wife, we are
in a
relationship that demands a level of love, intimacy and vulnerability that goes beyond friendship and can only be found
in a God - blessed bond.
This «curse» is not applied to all women, but is sheathed
in the context of husband -
wife relationships.
In a similar way, disidentify your self from your feelings and emotions (I have emotions, but lam more than my emotions, and so on); your desires; your intellect and thoughts; your job; your social roles (e.g., father or mother, husband or
wife, your job roles); your
relationships; your problems.
It also holds that
wives should join their husbands
in egalitarian
relationships characterized by mutual love and submission.
Hardesty and Scanzoni, for example, conclude that the text
in Ephesians 5 could not be teaching support for a hierarchical marriage
relationship «because the dominant - husband submissive -
wife model of marriage was the norm
in the societies of that time.
I love my
wife and wouldn't trade that
relationship for anything
in this world, but only a willfully defiant person could claim that marriage doesn't have troubles.
From that perspective, when his
wife died, he should have expected to feel her presence
in a new way because she is
in a new
relationship to him.