Sentences with phrase «win money while»

I'm used to spending too much money on vacation, so the thought of competing to win money while having fun in a new destination is pretty intriguing.

Not exact matches

While they won much of that back during the most recent week, 80 percent of that money...

And while the lack of regulation in this area may mean some people are going to lose a lot of money, the potential for major wins is great.

While common football metaphors like «Don't sit on the sideline» can be useful, your best bet is to focus conversations around your excitement for the annual «Super Bowl Squares,» a betting pool operated by the Super Bowl Square Manager, wherein an employee with the least amount of football knowledge wins the most money.

While Hershey rejected Mondelez's initial approach, Mondelez or another suitor could offer more money to try and win over the Hershey board.

While she and her female partners were fund - raising in March, one investor told them that they should marry for money, that he liked it when women fought back because he would always win, and that they needed more attractive photos of themselves in their presentation.

While predatory pricing technically remains illegal, it is extremely difficult to win predatory pricing claims because courts now require proof that the alleged predator would be able to raise prices and recoup its losses.405 Revising predatory pricing doctrine to reflect the economics of platform markets, where firms can sink money for years given unlimited investor backing, would require abandoning the recoupment requirement in cases of below - cost pricing by dominant platforms.

Where they thought winning a lot of money would make them happier, while it only magnified their problems.

«Actually, Caesar staked him — and all the money he has was won through Caesar's System at Caesar's tables, while Caesar's Armies protected the loot.

While I agree it would be good to be in for Griezmann and other players like him, the idea that just going out and spending huge amounts of money buying x number of world class players will give you a winning team has been shown to be flawed.

I'm getting annoyed that people fail to notice the positive he did recently (he started spending money, keep the team in tact, getting a new physio in, try to win game ugly when result is getting bad) while it is very fair points that he made very wrong judgement in not getting enough defensive cover, and his players are naive at time in term of tactics.

he was one goal away from winning champions league while spending very little money.

something does nt make sense to me (actually a lot of things): i would love to have a 1:1 conversation with wenger: why is he doing this (not buying WC players while we have money in the bank): is it really because he thinks we can win without such investment?

While the Seahawks and the over were the winning bets, OddsShark said on Sunday that 62 percent of the money was placed on the Broncos and 55 percent of bettors were taking the under.

Prize money was determined by points scored as well as won - loss, and while Buchholz had a perfect 31.0 VASSS average, Roche edged him out in total earnings with $ 1,612.40, by virtue of winning a greater percentage of his points, even though he did lose an exciting 31 - 30 set to Drysdale.

as he motivates them (gently and mildly of course) before a game to win and give their 1000 % while he saves money in the bank??? as he play same formation each time?

He loses they don't care so long as he gets champions league football and the money that comes with it so it's a win win for him while the rest of us have to suffer.

I do not view him as a Judas but just another player who wants to win trophies while being paid good money to do so.

Change the owner and give Wenger the target to win the EPL and while we are at it allow Wenger to spend 100 % of any money made from transfers.

This means a lot of money is coming on Denver to win it, possibly due to the fact that the Broncos cruised to victory in the AFC Championship, while the Seahawks fought a close one in Seattle.

Ueberroth convinced the owners to run their teams like their other businesses to make money while emphasizing that profits were more important than winning.

In the Bible David won.In terms of facts not one Arsenal player performed consistently well, and while Man City won with comfort, they were not at their best.What does that tell us about the current state of our team?And please no more excuses for Mustafi.He and his friend Xhaka should not be playing for Arsenal.They are simply not good enough.Along with Kolasinac they are examples of incompetence in the transfer market.Leicester have shown us that it's not all about money and in the case of Maguire, Kante and Mendez you have examples of excellent buys at little cost.Am I correct?

He's so consistently good that he sometimes takes criticism for all the money made from top 10 results, while having only seven PGA Tour wins and no majors.

It's more about Kroenke, Gazidis and Wenger diving into a pool of money Scrooge McDuck style while they laugh at all the fans expecting us to win like peasants.

Yea stupid clubs like city, chels winning trophies while we are gathering all the money WTF argument is that for a fan who watches football not the bank balance

strengthening opponents is not a good thing, when Man U or Chelsea or Man city sells us their players, you'll only get Welbeck and Sylvester type of flops, but we give them Van Persie, A. Cole, Sanchez etc. they always go on to win the league while for us, the money goes straight to Wenger's salary increment for next season..

I know that at first glance, not many people would compare Arsenal with Man City at the minute, because the last 10 years or so have seen the two clubs operating about as differently as possible, with Arsene Wenger working on a shoestring and our trophy winning ability dwindling year on year, while a succession of City bosses have been throwing money around like lottery winners and propelling the club to it's most successful period.

Yes a big squad with average players that he bought while other clubs spend money on proven players with winning mentality.

Making money comes first for AW while winning silverwares is Mourinho's priority.

Mino Raiola believes Pogba is a future Ballon d'Or winner and that Juve would be well advised to cash in on his sale while they can, as the money brought in from his transfer could see them build a far stronger team capable of challenging to win the Champions League.

The Board is only interested in money not trophies they figure they have enough in the cabinet, Ridiculous wenger is only interested in his legacy, he wants to say he did it his way and he won the EPL and the CL, but this is where his legacy is distorted, his teams that he creates for the last couple years has played with HANDICAPs, several deficiencies compared compared to precious teams he created, the main failings is the frail midfielders he has taken a loving to, while in previous years if he had frail players in the midfield, he also had man mountains who could do the defensive work in the middle of the park.

Below is the confirmed prize money breakdown from 2014 - 15 season where Chelsea won the league accumulated around # 98.99 million while bottom side QPR earned # 64.8 million.

All this while winning (obviously losing is not going to make you money).

This season could see a team that narrowly survived relegation last season win the EPL without spending any unusual amounts of money while last year's EPL Champions are now in the bottom half of the table!

People used to call us boring Arsenal when George Graham was manager we used to win 1 0, I wish we were winning 1 0 and be boring than watch some of the garbage football we are serving up Wenger will never be sacked or resign while money keeps rolling in.Why do we still pay the highest price to go and watch these overpaid pre-modanas.

Let's just rant at Wenger and show him no respect and while we are at it let's ignore the fact that we won the FA cup last season and are in the knockout stages of the Champions League yet again, something that most clubs can not manage with no injury problems and lots of money to spend.

Kruger is owed a $ 3.083 million cap hit through next season, so while he's a very good defensive center who won two Stanley Cups in Chicago, other teams will likely be weary of taking on that money considering he has just six points in 48 games.

Right now the massive United signing Romelu Lukaku leads the Golden boot with 7 goals already, with Chelsea's big money arrival weighing win with 6 along with Harry Kane and Sergio Aguero while our new man has made a reasonable start with 4 so far.

I started googling way back in may who could we be buying gonzalo higuian, julio cesar and wayne rooney but realize going by history wenger just as no interest in buying world class players, he wants 2 buy d grade players and turn them up to koscienly nd nasri that will take years while da arsenal faithful pay handsome figures for dismal performances, fans allowed wenger 2 get away when he gets away with these lucky matches of fenerbache been strong on paper but a waste of tym on the pitch, also it happen at bayern but they put a slighty weak team but wenger runt his mouth around of how good da team was after that 2 - 0 win, not forgetting it was bould that got the team defense looking solid while wenger moan about referee decisions and no blame on team, I just feel we (arsenal) have allowed wenger and co to misuse us, so now our main target aim is benzema yet giroud plays more often than him for france, can any1 see how wenger is lowing our standards and expectations at arsenal, I wil be over da moon if wenger does not sign an extension wit us, after the gilberto days and disaterous results and teams we play, his approach to the game defensely which is pathetic and his annoying behaviour.So what if manu and chelski haven't really bought they are already strong it was seen last week now we should be worried about our selves since that villa defeat, jst imagine what the man's and london money maniac's are goin 2 do to us, I can see it already coming from wenger, if we find the right player we will buy him, after sept2, we didn't find da right player but the squad can challenge for the title, its so sick having 2 hear that crap, just take him psg, I just wish the fans would say we had enough of this bullshit transfer policies its time we stood up against these pigs of directors by protesting!

Mean while Liverpool seems to be the team that will most likely win the league and am glad because this will just show up how flat line Arsenals excuses about money has been, All you need is some shrewd signings and a manager that has some tactics and you're in business all of which we lack BUT just finish 4th and we're good.

Clearly a balance has to be struck between such expense and bringing in new players and while Tottenham seem bound to enter the transfer market at some point before the window closes, Levy recognises the importance of team spirit and the obvious fact that only one club can win the league title no matter how much money is splashed about.

Also, if we are saying that only money will win you the league then it is indeed sad and it reminds me of what I said a while back where if FFP is not effective, we may as well dispense with playing the 38 matches in a season and just get the club treasurers of each of the 20 clubs to turn up at the beginning of the season with a copy of the clubs latest bank statement.

While Fergie and Mourinho have won trophies, they have spent a lot of money and not built the foundations as Wenger did.

Manchester United to win to nil at Bet365 is a quote of 6/5 while under 2.5 goals in the match returns a price of even money.

It's certainly a win - win situation for these schools, but it also creates a disturbing picture of rich kids nibbling on sushi and having enough money for the team uniforms, while poor kids in a neighboring district are not only getting eating subpar food, they're often selling candy and other junk food to raise money for those same uniforms, further contributing to poor health habits that may last a lifetime.

While nobody knows for certain who will win the 2010 elections, the western Queens races for state Senate are marked by clear leads of the incumbents over their challengers when it comes to raising and spending money.

Not sure, if this is undetAnd, labour spent more than the Tories in 2005 75 % of labours spending in 1997 came from the private side, and recall 1979 when the closed shop meant everyone had to joina Union, that union had to give money to the labour party, we knew the next election would be the most vicious since 1992 ′ we win the campaign, lost the election that time, The Tory press isn't as strong as it was then, the tories haven't got lost of «extremist» stories about labour they had thrn to smear us now, They're a smaller party not just cos of Ukip, But labour has a lot of keen strong members, and it'll come doen to 70 or so marginal seats what happens, while not losing our working class votes in Newcastle, birmingham Luton Rotherham, Scotland, and if they're not abstaining, or voting Ukip, we have to ask why they're voting tory

While the appellate decision was viewed as a win for TechCity, most of the money refunded by the KCSD and the town won't be paid to Alan Ginsberg, the owner of the business center; Ulster County paid the town back taxes when TechCity didn't always meet its obligations during the period covered by the settlement.

Horse Money won Costa what is traditionally regarded as the festival's third - place prize, while a surprise second - place Leopard went to Alex Ross Perry's disagreeable comedy Listen Up, Philip — disagreeable not in its success (it works quite well), but in its protagonist, the detached, anxiety - ridden, pathologically narcissistic writer Philip Friedman (Jason Schwartzman).

Meanwhile, four dissolute gamblers at the track pool the last of their money in an effort to win an elusive Pick Six bet while weathered trainer Walter Smith (Nolte) sees his second chance in an untested thoroughbred horse.