Not exact matches
«The night before the
election, we deployed two teams
so that we would be ready to provide a PDB brief the
next morning to whomever
won,» Clapper said, referring to the Presidential Daily Briefing.
So with Occupy Wall Street, and Penn State football child molestation allegations, and the dearth of credible Republican candidates to run against a President who seems to have no care other than
winning the
next election, and Kim Kardashian apparently marrying whomever for millions of....
Some may argue that Labour can afford to lose some support in its heartlands
so long as it does well where it needs to
win seats at the
next general
election.
There is no doubt that the Tories or Labour are going to
win the
next general
election,
so Mr Radcliffe on this basis is going to be disappointed when he has cast his vote, in other words he will waste his vote.
A majority in the Labour movement believe the coalition will prove
so unpopular that Labour will
win the
next election without having to change fundamentally.
Most dangerously of all, they think the coalition will prove
so unpopular that Labour will
win the
next election almost by default, without needing to change.
This one
won't necessarily be as bang on as that in 2001, a poll of 661 party members has a margin of error of about 4 %,
so we could be looking at actual splits between 63/37 to 71/29, but either way, Cameron has
won the
election and is going to be the
next Tory leader.
So if he is unable to play that card, either because the economy does not recover in time or because the electorate does not believe him, what is it precisely that Labour does plan to
win the
next election on?
«Five, that they would reduce recurrent expenditure
so as to create capital funds for development, and six that if he
wins election and accept those conditions, they would support them, we would expect all those in the
next government.»
The
next election will see a big turnout by Labour and Conservative supporters and where Liberal Democrat MP's do survive it will be solely due to tactical voting, UKIP could even make a breakthrough in a couple of seats but I think Labour will still
win,
so it will be more strongly toward a 2 party system but with the strongest 4th party performance in UK history.
He said: «We must
win the
next general
election so that Labour can rebuild and transform Britain —
so that no one and no community is left behind.
«If they can do it,
so can I, and over the
next few months, that will mean a policy lockdown and crunching the numbers
so that when the
election begins in 2008 we will have a
winning manifesto.»
Not sure, if this is undetAnd, labour spent more than the Tories in 2005 75 % of labours spending in 1997 came from the private side, and recall 1979 when the closed shop meant everyone had to joina Union, that union had to give money to the labour party, we knew the
next election would be the most vicious since 1992 ′ we
win the campaign, lost the
election that time, The Tory press isn't as strong as it was then, the tories haven't got lost of «extremist» stories about labour they had thrn to smear us now, They're a smaller party not just cos of Ukip, But labour has a lot of keen strong members, and it'll come doen to 70 or
so marginal seats what happens, while not losing our working class votes in Newcastle, birmingham Luton Rotherham, Scotland, and if they're not abstaining, or voting Ukip, we have to ask why they're voting tory
Robert regarding your view that labour cold
win with 35 %, yes, but we
won in 1974 ′ with 37 % and I believe Callaghan actually got a few more votes in 79 ′ than 74 although the percentage was the me, the point was that the 74 manifesto was
so far from what the public felt, that the following
election lots of liberals or stay at home voters came out and the Tories would get 13 + million for the
next f our.
And it will «reach out to other communities, campaign groups, movements
so we can have a big diverse movement to
win power at the
next election».
He wanted to kick the EU referendum into the long - grass and
so he gave the impression that were he to
win the
next general
election he would re-negotiate a new relationship with Brussels.
However, a former minister says: «I don't care what Crosby does
so long as he
wins us the
next election.»
Replying to Labour criticism of Conservative plans to recognise marriage in the tax system, Philip Hammond, the shadow work and pensions secretary, told Channel 4 News: «What we have said, and we've clarified that this afternoon just
so there shouldn't be any confusion, we are absolutely committed to introducing a recognition of marriage in the tax system during the course of the
next parliament, if we
win the
election.»
David Waddington saying that to
win the
next election we needed to
win the North and Thatcher was too London centric,
so supported Whitelaw (14 years later Thatcher made him Home Secretary).
Fact was many people thought labour would do very poor,
so voted labour as a protest against the Tories, on the likes of the Dementia tax, but didn't actually want labour to
win, the Tories are still imploding, labour is in the rise, I'm not saying labour wouldn't
win a
election, if it was called tommorow, but thre are people who voted labour thinking we wouldn't
win,
so did it anyway, who won't vote labour
next time, as they're worried we would
win.
at the present rate, I will not be able to vote conservative at the
next election (i live in croydon central - where we
won by 80 votes at the last
election -
so I am one of the lucky few that has a vote that counts).
Even
so, at today's post
election press briefing, the UDP Party Leader says that they are confident that come the next General Election, they will win a fourth consecutive term in
election press briefing, the UDP Party Leader says that they are confident that come the
next General
Election, they will win a fourth consecutive term in
Election, they will
win a fourth consecutive term in office.