Sentences with phrase «wing back because»

Stylewise I had my heart set on a wing back because I felt like the room would be cozier and more balanced if the chair had a high back.

Bellerin is a more natural wing back because he was already converted from winger to full back, but he needs to learn the position.

Not exact matches

maybe christians are losing power because people are realizing they follow a book that has unicorns, dragons, satyrs and c.ockatrice in it, also a talking snake and a talking donkey (like in shrek), a man spends 3 days in the belly of a whale (like pinnochio), men have wings on their back and fly..

I decided to go back to my usual meal planning method this week because my mom is in town and sometimes winging it, like we have been doing, causes more problems such as hungry, cranky children.

«It suits my game because when I'm playing wing - back there's a lot of space to run into,»

few weeks back there was an article on here about injured players coming back and helping at the tail end of the season; the article was big on Wilshire and I commented saying Welbeck will be the one I will most look out or because he offers us something different upfront, either as a striker or on the wings, I also said Wilshire does not register on my radar not because he os not good but simply because we have better players in his role and he has not been missed one jot....

Bottom line, if he is angered bench the players who were not good enough and play those who deserve some game time based on the Southampton game or on games where they had a positive impact: - Take Özil out and play Ox in the hole (he has to understand your the highest paid player of the club, your given freedom like nobody else and your even seeking even more money with a new contract you can't play like that ever and go AWOL)- Put Sanchez on the wing or up top but put Welbeck in (Walcott didn't track back near enough for the Alsonso goal)- Iwobi has been bright from the wing let him play there - Xhaka has to go back in the holding midfield role and I would take out Coquelin because he could've taken a foul on the hazard's goal.

Am i the only one here seeing that Wenger's sin was not because he signed Welbeck on the dead of the transfer window but stubbonlly refusing to sign a decent replacement to Vermalean, a natural (not converted) DM and possibly a sound left wing back.

The only reason is because Wenger wants to accomodate both Ramsey and Wilshere, and i promise you, Ozil will be back to the wing anytime soon.

«He's been a success because he's a good football player, and he looks like he's made for the wing - back position because he likes to go forward and the timing of his runs is very good.

I don't mind Jack on the wing because he tracks back, would've preferred Sanchez though for his work rate, additional pace and goals.

I have said it here time and time again that Theo Walcott has everything needed to play as a striker except for strength and aggression.Theo Walcott will always lose the physical battle when his back is to goal.That is a huge concern because its reduces the potency of the attack.I would really hope he stays on the wing and Wenger should sign a Centre forward.You cant just be rotating week in week out just like that you need your players to play so they can find form.Theo should stay on the wing.

It's been all down to a shift in mindset from one that lied to him that he's arrived just because he's Theo Walcott, England's youngest goalscorer and World Cup player and the best thing since sliced bread and the entitled attitude that follows naturally [hence wanting to play through the middle without first paying his dues on the wings, even Messi, Ronaldo, Henry, RVP and now Sanchez paid theirs] to one where he can see his career going down the drain highlighted by his Euro snub, a jolt of reality that got him to roll up his sleeves and gave us the Walcott we now see, the disciplined and commited player we no longer have to beg to track back and visibly looking to improve all aspects of his game.

Last season Sanchez had a dip, Wenger came out saying it was because Sanchez on the left wing is a bit too predictable and he moved Sanchez to the right where he was back to his best.

Liver was able to easily contain Arsenals attack and pressuring Bellerin is because Ramsey never stayed on the wing or tracked back when he losses the ball... He kept losing and throwing away passes and wouldn't hunt for the ball anytime he losses it... WHY ON EARTH!

Having Ozil of all people play as a winger especially in front of either full back in Debuchy or Monreal is suicide because he will not track back whatsoever and in a formation like that which is designed to thrive on position you need a work horse on the wings for whichever full back you plan to have overloading the wing AS WELL AS a positionally astute defensive midfielder to come across and provide cover.

Arsenal selling him for 40m was a Jackpot because i'll play Nelson before him anyday, same kind of runs but Nelson has an end product and more creative which makes me see him as a more advanced player and not a wing back.

Our 3 back is just so wrong.We don't have natural wingbacks even in this formation.It also seems to me that lots of people here believe if you're good at right or left fullback then automatically you're good at RWB / LWB which quite frankly is untrue.That's why Oxlade Chamberlain can be considered at RWB but not right back.At RWB or LWB you're asking too much in terms of attack from Bellerin and Kolasinac.A proper wing back can be viewed as a more defensive winger which quite frankly none of them are and they don't possess the flexibility too to play that way.Our midfielders are also not disciplined enough because in 3 back there's a huge gap in the centre of the field that must be covered by our CM's so indiscipline only means disaster.We also have Ozil who looks like he's playing at RW in 3 back.In that we're limiting his impact because Ozil takes on his man because he wants to not because he likes to.You can't play such players at the wing.He's a proper No. 10 who likes to be given freedom.That's why Ozil plays likes he's lazy on the ball and stuff.It's because he wants to be free and for that you need to put him at No. 10.

4 at the back becomes 2 at the back when we get hit on the counter because of the wing - backs and no DM, so at least with 3 at the back, you have 3 to deal with counters, as the wing - backs are now separate from the back line within the 3 -4-3.

Although not outstanding the South American has looked solid enough at right wing - back in this new look formation, which is probably because Valencia has previous experience playing in defence.

Full backs are mostly beaten mainly because the more skilful players are usually on the wings.

If he did leave because he didn't like the wing - back role then that would be quite ironic, because that was the only position he ever looked any good in.

Part of the reason Ox was so brilliant at wing back was because his crosses were really good most of the time.

Agree and as I've stated before in this forum we need a disciplined midfielder that can read the counter attack when we bomb forward because behind the wing backs, there are acres of space to be capitalized by the opposition.

As you would expect, (or as is usual with Arsenal) Monreal would have run into the empty space in the left corner you didn't run into, and because the opponent's wing back is supposed to mark you, he follows you, leaving Monreal unmarked.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

This doesn't necessarily mean that Alexis is dropped because of course, the Chilean is more than likely to be pushed back out on the wing, just as he was against United after Giroud's introduction, although there were signs this week that maybe he could do with a rest.

Can't wait for Walcott back because you know Wenger will put him in the starting line up on the wing with Sanchez on the other.

Only recently has the Ox started to really look the part at Arsenal and I reckon that could be because of Wenger giving him the new wing back position.

im not Theos biggest fan but the way hes being treated right now i wouldn't be surprised if he left.Against Hull, Wenger played a central midfielder Ramsey on the wing insted of Walcott, then when he brought Ramsey off he brought on another central midfielder Wiltshere, he only brought on Walcott lfor Giroud.If your Walcott what would you be thinking?Those of us who understand the way we play with 1 up top kow that Theo will never be our regular striker because he doesn't have the necessary skills.His only real postion is on the right either as an inside right or an out an out winger.The fact he doesn't track back alot may be reason why Wenger does nt start him, but even so he must be fi.

As long as we have still got Gooners yapping about, «Awww, I feel so so sorry for OZIL because he is being asked to play in the wing and has to track back, Ozil shouldn't be asked to help out in defence, he is an attacker and the best # 10 in the world so he should be left to just float around in the final 3rd.»..

but for that game we need to be careful who we play on the wings because they need to be willing to track back and can break quick because Everton fullbacks love getting forward

Off topic anyone notice how ozil was used on the left wing last season and the first part of this season and he was under performing fans and pundits were all saying how wenger should build the team around ozil since that was his best position and he cost us 42m well since his return he has only played either cam or right wing (he said in a interview that those were his fav positions since he played them at real) taking the place of an in form cazorla and it all seems to work I think wenger has done this all on purpose because if u look at ozils overall performance after his injury its much better than before, he tackles, wins the ball back and covers more distance than anyone else wenger does this often using players out of position for a while only to make their overall game better and mostly it works genius

People really need to think and remember why Managers not Wenger but Managers in general stick Central players on the flanks, Its for their development to learn how to track back and cover the flanks Everyone must be stupid to think Wenger does nt know Ozils strength is through the middle but Hes a manager and he knows his weakness was being on the flank and not contributing to defsensive duties Anchelotti noticed that and thats when Ozil got punished being subbed off for not putting in enough effort getting comfortable playing through the middle without tracking back, Wenger noticed this including Joachim Lowe so they played him on the wings to learn how to track and defender instead of giving the candy to the baby and letting him get what he wants through the middle hes learned the ard way the same way Wilshere had todo getting pushed over to the left when we all knew Wilsheres game is through the middle Even Santi has had to play on the left and look at his improvement defensively now he tracks back and puts in a shift in defense because he knows since leaving Monreal or gibbs for dead when he was played on the left, You guys need to Study football more and how World Class managers Develop the Squad and Individuals with there weaknesses and lazyness.

We need width from wingers not wing backs.We couldn't force the 2 centre back wide because we didn't have enough wing play.

Back to my original point the signing of Morata is a clear indication that somehow there is still faith in Giroud, because let's be honest he won't replace him in his first season; he would most likely be his back up or play along the wing or as an inside forward, where he is frequently used for JuvenBack to my original point the signing of Morata is a clear indication that somehow there is still faith in Giroud, because let's be honest he won't replace him in his first season; he would most likely be his back up or play along the wing or as an inside forward, where he is frequently used for Juvenback up or play along the wing or as an inside forward, where he is frequently used for Juventus.

yeah but i also have to say that he does nt sparkle either: / he did score some goals but whenever i see him in the game i cant really say that he is the one i want to have permanently on the right because he slows the attacks down very often and often passes turn on the wing and passes back, right now he is only better than the ox because he scored 3 goals more i think maybe a bit more, but neither of them do enough, ramsey on the other side when he started on the wing at the start of the season did a lot of things for the build - up i prefer ramsey to campbell... well of course an in form walcott of the season 12/13 would be the dream because in that season he was in my opinion equal if not better than sanchez of the season 14/15 but thats a dream xD

If we're playing narrow with our wing backs overlapping that is fine, just we rarely got to that point because Welbeck could never hold the ball up to create a platform.

I'm not certain how it would play out but it would have been interesting to see Perez playing in a front 3 with Sanchez and Lacazette, with Perez on the right, but in order to do that we would need a true defensive midfielder so that we could still have Ozil in the middle, playing behind the front 3, and Sead and Ox / Bellerin taking turns making wide side runs... unfortunately Wenger has made sure that could never happen because it would require buying the proper back 3 to handle this situation and he would have to bench his beloved Walcott and Ramsey on a regular basis... like I said before, I'm very concerned that Wenger will play Lacazette out wide on the left with Giroud in the middle, which means Sead will likely be in the back 3 and Ox will be played in the left wing - back position, which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever... God, I hope I'm wrong

Because he'll change to give others playing time and not every winger can play wing - back.

Damn lumbering tree shouldn't be dropping deep and going out to the wings because he can not get back into the middle when he is needed.

Two wing back must track back faster because they left the defensive line shallow.

Because of the wing - back system I'm not sure where I stand on any new wingers, I thought we needed two, but now not so sure.

Because Wenger loves his wing - backs to bomb forward at the same time, our back four quickly becomes a back two.

In this formation you don't play with traditional wingers anyway because you have the wing backs flooding forward.

I do t get it because you are saying wing backs play as central midfielders.

Ramsey can not repeat his marvelous season of two years back because he plays on the wing.

1) IF Sanchez leaves, then get Bale and Lacazette as Replacement, it would be would class signings, Because madrid may get Mbappe, But if i were Mbappe i would watch and see what happened to James Rodriguez and one time World Most Expensive player Bale 2) Arsenal can also sell Bellerin for # 50 - 55 millon or much lees with Ardan Turan as part of the deal and get Sidibe or Any very young Versertile Right wing back 3) Sell Sanchez if he won't agree to a new Deal, Convince Bale to come to Arsenal, pay # 80 - 90 mill for Bale on 300k a week, get Lacazette too, and if Ardan Turan comes, we will have a solid Attack 3.4.2.1 Lacazette ozil, Bale Kolasoniac, Xhaka, Ramsey / Turan, Sidibe / ox Holding, Boss, Mustafi 4.2.1.3 Ardan, Lacazette, Bale Ozil, Xhaka Ramsey Koslanic,, BOss, Mustafi, Sidibe

It makes sense for Chelsea's left - back to be very forward - thinking because Eden Hazard will likely cut inside a lot from his left - wing position, creating ample space for an overlapping defender.

May be Wenger should positioned him at his rightful place, in the middle... We are not the German national team (we have no where near the same midfield quality, no where close) where he plays on the wing because the DM can track back.