Ps - I would rather go for a quality
winger than a striker.
That is why he is a better
winger than a striker because of his energy.
His defensive work is more fitting for
a winger than a striker.
As for Walcott — good player but not a great player, inconsistent finisher and injury prone — a better
winger than striker but a very good option for last 30 mins with his directness and pace - a bit expensive for that though - # 140k pw - wow how much does he earn per minute played?
Yhh keep on making excuses until the transfer window is closed and we don't have the opportunity to buy a striker again if you watch Alexis play you will see he is more of
a winger than a striker
I see Walcott as much of
winger than a striker, our English players should b reduced, two of dem should go bcoz of often injury.
Jese is more of
a winger than a striker.
Not exact matches
im not to sure about sterling because im on the idea to take a
striker first, like lacazette and play in the wing ox, welbeck, walcott, chuba or maybe campbell or wellington (probably i would sell the last one... al of u try him like a star when he is not younger
than campbell and he did nt do anything, for me he is not on the standard)... BUT u cant said that walcott is the best
winger in the league when he is fit.
Speaking after Walcott announced that he wants to return to playing on the wing, where has had his better days, Wenger has instead came out to the media to announce that he personally sees Walcott's future as a
striker at Arsenal, rather
than a
winger.
at Man U, he's been a
winger more
than a
striker.
Get real in his almost 5 years at Arsenal his scored less
than 15 goals in all his games played.He is great on the wings and should stay there, this converting a
winger in2 a
striker talk is ridiculous, the
striker we are looking for belongs to another team, so let's just go out and buy him, SIMPLE!!!!!! But yes the goal Ox scored against Chivas was pure class.
Mahrez is a brilliant player for sure without a doubt but the OX showed last night that he could be even better
than Mahrez with the OX campbell and walcott do we really need a
winger I beg to differ what we need is a
striker a
striker of 25 + goals imagine henry or van on the team sheet now with the squad we have I liked be yedder because he was young and complete
striker a
striker that no mater of the circumstances are or position will strike you a goal pace agility skill clever cunning and ugly
Right now in terms of
Striker /
winger / cb position even Spurs are ahead of us
Striker SPURS Kane and Janssen
Winger: ARSENAL Alexis and Campb / iwobi / ox / welb Centre Back Pair: SPURS: Vertonghen and Alderweirld (even though Koscielney is better
than both)
I am more concerned about our attack, that attack can not win BIG trophies, we need more
than a
striker... we need a prolific and dangerous
winger....
I am ready to admit right now that I didn't believe that he would fare better as a
striker than a
winger.
I'm starting to think we need a new
winger more
than striker, playing with ramsey / wilshere on the wing is just killing our attack.
Rather
than buying Morata I would prefer for us to stick with Giroud with Sanchez as second
striker like Griezmann in the France team then we sign a left
winger like Reus, Draxler or Gotze
that has always been a lie, podolski got enough games every year and yep he was our best finisher but last time i checked football and
wingers /
strikers had more to them
than only finishing, of course its a good thing but podolski didn't offer anything else
than having a shot when the ball fell to him or came to him, this would have been okay would he have been a
striker, but as a
striker he never performed
Overall good performance.But
STRIKER — CF is Still needed and must be better
than Giroud, Walcolt is a natural
winger.
What we have is three attacking midfielders which depending on who is playing have slightly different instructions, who interchange constantly, the «
wingers» have a job to come inside at nearly every opportunity and one of the three, Sanchez more often
than not recently, has extra licence to act more as a secondary
striker.
In my opinion Giroud may well be the club's main
striker, because let's face it Alexis is a converted
winger rather
than a
striker.
We've got to have full backs and
wingers than can actually take they're man on and provide for a
striker that can always be available to benefit from this forward momentum and that can anchor the
striker to afford to stay high and in the box.
Head and shoulders better
than any
striker we have but fans like you just like the «overhyped» tag because he's not done it as a
winger.
Better selection of top
wingers than top
strikers.
Benzema is not Real Madrid standard and the last season of Sanchez in La Liga, Benzema as a
striker had less goals
than Sanchez who played as a
winger in a team with Messi.
Benzema is better
than giroud but not world class.I still think we should get a
winger and give Theo the chance to play as a
striker.
Secondly Nolito is more of a wingman
than a
striker and although we don't have too many recognised
wingers at the club, especially not to a high standard of ability, we should be focusing less on another midfield type player and instead be targeting a player who will be a regular upfront and be able to deliver to the high standards in front of goal that we expect.
He is a very hard worker, but if you are going to win titles or big trophies then you need more
than that from your
striker /
winger.
A 50 million inverted
winger (Salah) did better
than the expensive tall
strikers (such as Lukaku) that play centrally.
we did nt force midfielders to adapt out wide we just played with a different tactic and formation
than the most simple tactic of one
striker and two
wingers, if that was the only right formation then there wouldnt be so much different formations, you guys always talk as if the 4 -3-3 is a rule and wenger absolutely has to play a
winger in the right slot of the 3 up top, tactics arent and shouldnt be that simple, it isnt a rule that one has to play two
wingers..
This quistion highlights our weakness if sanchez is out we need a top varsatile left
winger, Abumeyang is the best option for me trigger his buyout clause and dortmond will be powerless to keep I rate him higher
than reus who is more expensive.Wc
strikers are not available but we should aim for versatile
winger fekir greizmann, reus.....
But for those of you who can perhaps broaden this out a little and see what title winning teams around Europe have been doing for the past 5 seasons, and also acknowledge the shift in emphasis with many teams relying more now on goal - scoring potency from wide forwards,
wingers, second
strikers and attacking midfielders then I think the debate is a little more subtle
than the «cut and paste a # 40M «guaranteed 25 goal» centre forward with no possible downside» proposition.
The Gunners may have recently discovered Alexis Sanchez's capabilities of playing as a
striker in front of goal, but let's be honest at the end of the day he is a converted
winger and if Arsenal truly want to become dominant across not just England but in Europe too, then the club needs to invest in a major frontman who will get them more
than 20 goals a season in all competitions.
my hunch is that wenger might find it easier to find a very good
winger than central
striker.
For that money you could get a fantastic
winger AND solid DM which would improve the club much more
than getting a
striker who will get 2 or 3 more goals
than Giroud if all goes well.
I agree completely.I have been thinking what if we Wenger converts Alexis into a
striker then buys seriously pacey and direct
winger like Bolasie?Alexis is in the moulds of Aguero and Suarez and would surely give you a better performance
than some of these
strikers touted around for soooo much!
Lacazette is also more of a pure
striker than Sanchez who has always been 2nd
striker or
winger.
He is usually deployed as a
winger rather
than a
striker, but this season the Englishman has started popping up with important goals when called upon.
Give them free roles up front, that way all of them will be able to play as
strikers rather
than «supportive
wingers» as i'd call it.
If our defence was properly organised, with reliable cover from a consistent DMF, proper
wingers, no Ramsey giving the ball away, and a better (And more mobile)
striker than Giroud, then he would be the brilliant Ozil that played for Real and Germany (And Arsenal sometimes) once again.
It seems that Wenger AND the board prefer having a second choice
striker /
winger in Walkott on the bench and paying him the astronomical amount of # 120K / week,
than splashing some serious cash for a WC
striker.
A goal keeper with a pony tail and a big black bold defender, a soldier with his general in midfield, a
striker more at home in front of goal
than most goalkeepers and a
winger that excited with every touch.
I would want to see draxler more
than moura, moura is a
winger, I haven't seen him play behind the
striker before but draxler can play across the three attacking midfield positions.
I only see 1
striker on that list that is better
than Giroud but the list of «
wingers» is very impressive.
One of our
striker (Giroud or Walcott) whoever Wenger decides is surplus to what he is looking for, a
winger (Campbell, Ox) for different reasons
than the 4 mentioned before find themselves in like lack of playing time or performances.
All in all, Snachez - Perez or Sanchez - Giroud or even Sanchez - Wallcot up front is better
than playing with a single
striker and two
wingers IMHO.
I firmly believe he's better as a
striker than as a
winger.
Hi my fellow gunners, i think it will be a thing of joy if arsene
winger will splash some cash on nigerian
striker «ikechukwu uche» bcos the player is more sharper
than adebayor, so that arsenal striking force can be more stronger
than ever.
In combating Iceland's direct football, Osorio decided to play a 3 -3-1-3 formation with Diego Reyes — best known as a centre - back — placed in front of the three defenders, plus
striker Raul Jimenez and
winger Jesus Gallardo given the nod at least partially because they are better
than most Mexican players in the air.
Cliff Bastin (Outside Left)-- Cliff «Boy» Bastin was more a modern
striker than a 1930s
winger, fast and with a liking for cutting inside.