Sentences with phrase «winger than a striker»

Ps - I would rather go for a quality winger than a striker.
That is why he is a better winger than a striker because of his energy.
His defensive work is more fitting for a winger than a striker.
As for Walcott — good player but not a great player, inconsistent finisher and injury prone — a better winger than striker but a very good option for last 30 mins with his directness and pace - a bit expensive for that though - # 140k pw - wow how much does he earn per minute played?
Yhh keep on making excuses until the transfer window is closed and we don't have the opportunity to buy a striker again if you watch Alexis play you will see he is more of a winger than a striker
I see Walcott as much of winger than a striker, our English players should b reduced, two of dem should go bcoz of often injury.
Jese is more of a winger than a striker.

Not exact matches

im not to sure about sterling because im on the idea to take a striker first, like lacazette and play in the wing ox, welbeck, walcott, chuba or maybe campbell or wellington (probably i would sell the last one... al of u try him like a star when he is not younger than campbell and he did nt do anything, for me he is not on the standard)... BUT u cant said that walcott is the best winger in the league when he is fit.
Speaking after Walcott announced that he wants to return to playing on the wing, where has had his better days, Wenger has instead came out to the media to announce that he personally sees Walcott's future as a striker at Arsenal, rather than a winger.
at Man U, he's been a winger more than a striker.
Get real in his almost 5 years at Arsenal his scored less than 15 goals in all his games played.He is great on the wings and should stay there, this converting a winger in2 a striker talk is ridiculous, the striker we are looking for belongs to another team, so let's just go out and buy him, SIMPLE!!!!!! But yes the goal Ox scored against Chivas was pure class.
Mahrez is a brilliant player for sure without a doubt but the OX showed last night that he could be even better than Mahrez with the OX campbell and walcott do we really need a winger I beg to differ what we need is a striker a striker of 25 + goals imagine henry or van on the team sheet now with the squad we have I liked be yedder because he was young and complete striker a striker that no mater of the circumstances are or position will strike you a goal pace agility skill clever cunning and ugly
Right now in terms of Striker / winger / cb position even Spurs are ahead of us Striker SPURS Kane and Janssen Winger: ARSENAL Alexis and Campb / iwobi / ox / welb Centre Back Pair: SPURS: Vertonghen and Alderweirld (even though Koscielney is better than both)
I am more concerned about our attack, that attack can not win BIG trophies, we need more than a striker... we need a prolific and dangerous winger....
I am ready to admit right now that I didn't believe that he would fare better as a striker than a winger.
I'm starting to think we need a new winger more than striker, playing with ramsey / wilshere on the wing is just killing our attack.
Rather than buying Morata I would prefer for us to stick with Giroud with Sanchez as second striker like Griezmann in the France team then we sign a left winger like Reus, Draxler or Gotze
that has always been a lie, podolski got enough games every year and yep he was our best finisher but last time i checked football and wingers / strikers had more to them than only finishing, of course its a good thing but podolski didn't offer anything else than having a shot when the ball fell to him or came to him, this would have been okay would he have been a striker, but as a striker he never performed
Overall good performance.But STRIKER — CF is Still needed and must be better than Giroud, Walcolt is a natural winger.
What we have is three attacking midfielders which depending on who is playing have slightly different instructions, who interchange constantly, the «wingers» have a job to come inside at nearly every opportunity and one of the three, Sanchez more often than not recently, has extra licence to act more as a secondary striker.
In my opinion Giroud may well be the club's main striker, because let's face it Alexis is a converted winger rather than a striker.
We've got to have full backs and wingers than can actually take they're man on and provide for a striker that can always be available to benefit from this forward momentum and that can anchor the striker to afford to stay high and in the box.
Head and shoulders better than any striker we have but fans like you just like the «overhyped» tag because he's not done it as a winger.
Better selection of top wingers than top strikers.
Benzema is not Real Madrid standard and the last season of Sanchez in La Liga, Benzema as a striker had less goals than Sanchez who played as a winger in a team with Messi.
Benzema is better than giroud but not world class.I still think we should get a winger and give Theo the chance to play as a striker.
Secondly Nolito is more of a wingman than a striker and although we don't have too many recognised wingers at the club, especially not to a high standard of ability, we should be focusing less on another midfield type player and instead be targeting a player who will be a regular upfront and be able to deliver to the high standards in front of goal that we expect.
He is a very hard worker, but if you are going to win titles or big trophies then you need more than that from your striker / winger.
A 50 million inverted winger (Salah) did better than the expensive tall strikers (such as Lukaku) that play centrally.
we did nt force midfielders to adapt out wide we just played with a different tactic and formation than the most simple tactic of one striker and two wingers, if that was the only right formation then there wouldnt be so much different formations, you guys always talk as if the 4 -3-3 is a rule and wenger absolutely has to play a winger in the right slot of the 3 up top, tactics arent and shouldnt be that simple, it isnt a rule that one has to play two wingers..
This quistion highlights our weakness if sanchez is out we need a top varsatile left winger, Abumeyang is the best option for me trigger his buyout clause and dortmond will be powerless to keep I rate him higher than reus who is more expensive.Wc strikers are not available but we should aim for versatile winger fekir greizmann, reus.....
But for those of you who can perhaps broaden this out a little and see what title winning teams around Europe have been doing for the past 5 seasons, and also acknowledge the shift in emphasis with many teams relying more now on goal - scoring potency from wide forwards, wingers, second strikers and attacking midfielders then I think the debate is a little more subtle than the «cut and paste a # 40M «guaranteed 25 goal» centre forward with no possible downside» proposition.
The Gunners may have recently discovered Alexis Sanchez's capabilities of playing as a striker in front of goal, but let's be honest at the end of the day he is a converted winger and if Arsenal truly want to become dominant across not just England but in Europe too, then the club needs to invest in a major frontman who will get them more than 20 goals a season in all competitions.
my hunch is that wenger might find it easier to find a very good winger than central striker.
For that money you could get a fantastic winger AND solid DM which would improve the club much more than getting a striker who will get 2 or 3 more goals than Giroud if all goes well.
I agree completely.I have been thinking what if we Wenger converts Alexis into a striker then buys seriously pacey and direct winger like Bolasie?Alexis is in the moulds of Aguero and Suarez and would surely give you a better performance than some of these strikers touted around for soooo much!
Lacazette is also more of a pure striker than Sanchez who has always been 2nd striker or winger.
He is usually deployed as a winger rather than a striker, but this season the Englishman has started popping up with important goals when called upon.
Give them free roles up front, that way all of them will be able to play as strikers rather than «supportive wingers» as i'd call it.
If our defence was properly organised, with reliable cover from a consistent DMF, proper wingers, no Ramsey giving the ball away, and a better (And more mobile) striker than Giroud, then he would be the brilliant Ozil that played for Real and Germany (And Arsenal sometimes) once again.
It seems that Wenger AND the board prefer having a second choice striker / winger in Walkott on the bench and paying him the astronomical amount of # 120K / week, than splashing some serious cash for a WC striker.
A goal keeper with a pony tail and a big black bold defender, a soldier with his general in midfield, a striker more at home in front of goal than most goalkeepers and a winger that excited with every touch.
I would want to see draxler more than moura, moura is a winger, I haven't seen him play behind the striker before but draxler can play across the three attacking midfield positions.
I only see 1 striker on that list that is better than Giroud but the list of «wingers» is very impressive.
One of our striker (Giroud or Walcott) whoever Wenger decides is surplus to what he is looking for, a winger (Campbell, Ox) for different reasons than the 4 mentioned before find themselves in like lack of playing time or performances.
All in all, Snachez - Perez or Sanchez - Giroud or even Sanchez - Wallcot up front is better than playing with a single striker and two wingers IMHO.
I firmly believe he's better as a striker than as a winger.
Hi my fellow gunners, i think it will be a thing of joy if arsene winger will splash some cash on nigerian striker «ikechukwu uche» bcos the player is more sharper than adebayor, so that arsenal striking force can be more stronger than ever.
In combating Iceland's direct football, Osorio decided to play a 3 -3-1-3 formation with Diego Reyes — best known as a centre - back — placed in front of the three defenders, plus striker Raul Jimenez and winger Jesus Gallardo given the nod at least partially because they are better than most Mexican players in the air.
Cliff Bastin (Outside Left)-- Cliff «Boy» Bastin was more a modern striker than a 1930s winger, fast and with a liking for cutting inside.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z