Not exact matches
When STV is used for single -
winner elections, it is equivalent to the instant - runoff
voting (alternative
vote)
method.
CES: A lot of the electoral systems in the US rely on
winner - take - all, which sort of directly bars out proportional
voting methods.
... oh, also, since you mentioned Condorcet: approval
voting is more likely to elect the true Condorcet
winner than any «real» Condorcet
method.
Whether that means that there's a series of individual races, everyone in a pool with the top X
winners, everyone can
vote for up to X, or some other
method of determining representation isn't something I considered when asking the question.
As a result of changes in state laws enacted since 1789, the people have the right to
vote for presidential electors in 100 % of the states, there are no property requirements for
voting in any state, and the state - by - state
winner - take - all
method is used by 48 of the 50 states.
Like all
winner - take - all
voting methods, IRV tends to exaggerate the number of seats won by the largest parties; small parties without majority support in any given constituency are unlikely to earn seats in a legislature, although their supporters will be more likely to be part of the final choice between the two strongest candidates.
In Baden - Württemberg there are no lists; they use the «best near -
winner»
method in a four - region model, where the regional members are the local candidates of the under - represented party in that region who received the most
votes in their local constituency without being elected in it, but this model has not been copied in the United Kingdom.
Launched in 2010, ITTA's
winners are selected based on two
methods: 25 percent online
voting and 75 percent
voting from a committee that comprises experts in the travel and tourism industry.