Dale: If you compare investments to cash in a mattress, then there can be more
winners than losers, but if active investors compare their returns to a passive index, then they can not, as a group, outperform.
If you're counting at home, Mayor Bill de Blasio endorsed many more
winners than losers last night.
Returns of individual stocks in the portfolio followed the typical pattern for successful quarters — more
winners than losers, and gains of greater magnitude than losses.
Not exact matches
Unfortunately, there were more
losers than winners in the Canadian market.
This plays a big role in investor behavior: Investors have a (bad) habit of selling
winners and not letting
losers go because of loss aversion rather
than for logical financial reasons.
Responding to a question on whether Trump, who comes from the private sector, felt comfortable with his proposal that the government should punish or reward companies based on where they choose to locate their factories, rather
than let the free market pick
winners and
losers, the president responded:
«I prefer not to pick
winners and
losers when we're looking at cryptocurrencies like bitcoin / bitcoin Cash... Both have merits but if I was putting new money to work today... I would be a lot more interested in buying a lagger that could attract inflows rather
than something that's potentially overbought.»
Sadly there are more
losers than winners in this game and the risk involved has seen many a wealthy man ruined.
Are anomaly premiums (expected
winners minus
losers among assets within a class, based on some asset characteristic) more or less predictable
than broad market returns?
I guess I feel the same way about a liberal agenda that say that to get out of debt we have to spend more, or that my tax dollars have to pay for something I think is morally wrong (Obamacare sets up a fund to pay for late term abortions) or a government that confiscates kids lunches, or tells me how much soda I can drink, or uses my tax money to choose
winners and
losers (mostly
losers but Obma doners) in energy production that produces no energy yet we are sitting on more coal and oil
than any other nation on the planet.
I would say all sides come to the forefront, but I think that some of us see things from more
than one side to begin with and that there are many «sides» (perspectives) that are out there, I don't think it is a polemic, and I don't think it is «sides» in terms of choosing sides in a war... more a dialogue where confrontations take place, but (hopefully) most of the time not with the intent of
winners and
losers (or, if that is the intent, that hopefully we realize that and adjust our own rhetoric to move away from that pardigm)
In this case, the
losers happen to be the majority of Australia's farmers, and the big
winners have been Australia's two major supermarkets, whose market share has more
than doubled since the mid-1970s.
In this curious production, the
loser was a bigger
winner than the
winner.
It was fucking amazing even though my favorite fighter of all time Condit got finished anyways...
Winner: The crowd — Everyone got their money's worth with the main and co-main event, but the entire main card was great IMO plus there was a freaking omoplata finish BY A HEAVYWEIGHT
Loser: The crowd — From constant boos any time the fighters were on the ground for more
than 10 seconds to «Whooo!»
Perhaps even more important
than the points, however, is the morale boost that the
winner will get, while the
loser will have their current form and confidence damaged.
As a friend of mine pointed out long ago, the
winners don't get a lot more money
than the
losers in high school sports, so why would anyone risk their health for a victory that will most likely be forgotten in a few months?
Satisfaction with the eventual
winner was higher
than that with the eventual
loser for four months before every election.
But, one need look no further
than the current debate in the UK over the EU referendum to find other parallels with Repeal — e.g., an internal split in the Conservative party over British identity (particularly in a world with increasing trade linkages); the difficulty in ascertaining the
winners and
losers from a fundamental reorientation of trade policy, amidst inherent uncertainty; the existence of tensions between different sectors and regions, stemming from trade exposure; and so on.
In every case, satisfaction with the eventual
winner was higher
than that with the
loser at the last poll before each election.
The average of money raised by the two
losers is more
than the total raised by the 3
winners put together, and the average of the 3
winners is just about what Derrick has raised.
The system provides approximately proportional representation, enables votes to be cast for individual candidates rather
than for parties, and — compared to first - past - the - post voting — reduces «wasted» votes (votes on sure
losers or sure
winners) by transferring them to other candidates.
Vos said replacing money generated from the property tax levy with state dollars is a better approach to property tax relief
than trying to do it through the school aid formula, which he said results in
winners and
losers across the state.
In a Capital Tonight interview Wednesday, Tenney criticized the Cuomo administration for «picking
winners and
losers and deciding which business are more meritorious
than others.»
We're better
than choosing
winners and
losers.
Though bad
losers almost always make for better copy
than winners, there are limitations.
«Whether you are a
winner or a
loser, you would still be getting more money
than you are getting today.»
«More «
losers»
than «
winners» predicted for Southern Ocean seafloor animals.»
If an election
winner gains fewer votes
than the
loser, the system is flawed.
«Because «
losers» show much more stress hormone release
than do «
winners,» we initially hypothesized that the microbial changes would be more pronounced in animals that lost
than in animals that won.»
In the second stage, each participant then played either with the same or different partner
than they had played with in the first stage, ensuring in all cases that a first - stage
loser was paired with a
winner.
«For a government that says we can't pick
winners and
losers in the economy,» says Jim Turk, head of the Canadian Association of University Teachers, «it seems to sure be willing to pick
winners and
losers in research rather
than letting scientists make those determinations through peer review.»
However, in the long run, the majority of horseracing punters will lose money at the track — and there will always be more
losers than winners.
After a competition is over,
winners behave more dishonestly
than losers in an unrelated subsequent task, a new study finds.
The researchers found that after a competition is over,
winners behave more dishonestly
than losers in an unrelated subsequent task.
Winners and
losers spend more time caring for their offspring
than parents with no fighting contest experience
Some online dating profiles are thus more attractive
than others, corresponding to the natural tendency to be inclined towards
winners, not
losers.
The
winner buries the
loser,
than leaves with all the money.
With a catchy dance song blaring on the soundtrack, Girlhood opens on a high school football game before providing two subversive reveals: it's an all - girls football game, and both teams celebrate together afterward, focusing on the fun of playing rather
than categorizing
winners and
losers.
As always, the
winners and
losers may tell us more
than just what Oscar voters were thinking.
For example, high - risk middle - school lottery
winners are 18 percentage points more likely
than lottery
losers to be enrolled in CMS in their 10th - grade year.
The average social cost of the crimes committed by high - risk lottery
winners (after adjusting the cost of murders downward) is $ 3,916 lower
than for lottery
losers, a decrease of more
than 35 percent.
Because the lottery is random, any differences in outcomes between lottery
winners and
losers can be attributed to the effect of enrolling in the G&T magnet program rather
than one of these alternatives.
How many teachers benefit from state pension systems, by state 5/16/2017 • Accompanies Why Most Teachers Get a Bad Deal on Pensions State plans create more
losers than winners, and many get nothing at all By Chad Aldeman and Kelly Robson
As the first competition got underway in the fall, Secretary Duncan maintained that the bar will be «very, very high,» telling Education Week, «There will be a lot more
losers than winners.»
Why Most Teachers Get a Bad Deal on Pensions State plans create more
losers than winners, and many get nothing at all By Chad Aldeman and Kelly Robson 05/16/2017
This table shows that charter lottery
winners are about 15 percentage points less likely to switch
than losers.
Among charter high school applicants, lottery
winners are 5 percentage points less likely to be Hispanic and about 6 percentage points more likely to be black
than losers.
Among high school applicants, charter lottery
winners are more likely to switch schools
than losers, a marginally significant difference of 5 — 6 percentage points.
At pilot middle schools,
winners are less likely to switch
than losers, but this difference is not significantly different from 0.
If lottery
winners learned more
than losers, the effectiveness of the voucher initiative would be clearly established and the voucher movement could use this information to convince skeptics.