Sentences with phrase «winning arguments with»

But it doesn't help Paarlberg too much when it comes to winning arguments with his students.

I note LabourList have been overrun by UKIP... and they appear to be winning the arguments with the Corbyn supporters — or at least outnumbering them..

The table I long for — the church I hope for — is where we care more about our companions than about winning our arguments with them, where we set aside the condescension that accompanies our notion that we need to bring them our truth.

Too many of us try winning arguments with force.

You can't just win an argument with «because I'm right;» you need to get your client to answer the question «why not?»

Blaming the poor for their poverty is counter-productive; effectively arguing for the best way out of poverty is a winning argument with plenty of empirical evidence from developing nations around the world.

It was difficult to win any argument with such a man.

You can't win an argument with an ignorant stubborn fool?

When you say, «I hate you, too,» to win an argument with your child, you've already lost.

The answer is for the left to win arguments with real people and stop is time honoured Fabian strategy of, manipulating the system to vastly exaggerate the power held by a small minority whilst simultaneously complaining about their inability to concentrate even more power with Left Liberal courtiers via PR What the left hate and what they can not admit is that their leaders despise the views of many of their voters, perhaps a majority.

The evidence from a YouGov poll is that he can win this argument with affiliated trade unionists because most of them don't support Labour.

It's first time I've ever been able to win an argument with them.

You can never win an argument with a fanatic vegan (or other).

You just helped me win an argument with my husband!

Will appealing to logic win you every argument with your man?

It's in the tighter corners that Sir Isaac Newton eventually wins the argument with the Lamborghini engineers.

If you can't win your argument with the creditor or credit bureaus, you can file a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and they may take up the argument for you.

The best possible outcome is that you win an argument with an idiot.»]

She built the original spreadsheet - based version of this calculator to win an argument with someone about whether you could categorically declare any robo - advisor «the best».

If not, this would go to Super Danganronpa / Winning An Argument With A Bullet 2: Farewell, School Of Hopelessness, Beyond The Labyrinth, or Yakuza / Like A Dragon: Black Leopard: Asura Chapter.

And I'd have to say that if I have to save my life by winning an argument with oil men in a bar in Midland, Tex., on this topic, I would go in with some lumps of black mudstone from the ancient rock record, I'd go in with the established figures on our present input of carbon dioxide, and I'd say which bit of this observational science do you guys quarrel with, and why?

I can either believe the scientists at NASA or some poor guy that's trying to win an argument with his wife.

As for my posts I appologise to the clever people here, but sometimes you have to fight fire with fire as you will never win an argument with a moron.

Want to win an argument with a climate alarmist?

I have a standard lecture for my engineering students and it is this: «You will not win an argument with a lawyer.

In the immortal words of Bill Murray, «it's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person»

When I was an Employee, I never won an argument with my Boss, (not because I was wrong, but because I never had any power,) but with Real Estate, suddenly I am the one who makes the rules, and wins the arguments.

Not exact matches

Even a leader with perfect diction and a background in rhetorical strategy can't hope to win the influence of his or her peers through speeches and arguments alone.

«I don't» always wins, because «I don't» leaves no room for argument, compromise, or discussion — especially with yourself.

«If you're trying to win over someone whose natural allegiance are not with you, getting into an argument is a sure way to fail,» they write.

«The truth will win out, the best arguments will win and we should hear them and listen to them, work out what's wrong with them, if there is something wrong and refute them as they need to be refuted and that's the way a free society works.»

When I have discussions about the Bible with people who have different views than I do, my number one goal with them is not to win the argument, but to win another discussion.

Instead, they have tried to avoid the moral issue and win with pragmatic arguments, like what women need, the economics of raising a child, etc..

Remember, the number one goal of any conversation with any person is not to win the debate or argument, but to win another conversation.

Or maybe it's because they see the atheists winning every argument and are livid with jealousy and seek to usurp our arguments, yet they clearly have not thought things through, as you can see.

If you having to force your views on others and not through winning them over with reason, then your arguments are possibly flawed, your actions do not match what you preach or the person you are talking to may over time change their view.

The corollary would be that a diminution of the public honor accorded to those who died in combat might be desirable in helping Mr. Hayes win his next round of foreign policy disputes with John McCain - disputes that he might otherwise lose in public argument about the merits of the military operation in question.

It is completely okay to disagree with me or anyone else in the group, but it is not okay to try to «win the argument» through abusive and bullying behavior like name - calling and shaming.

The bottom line and then I'll shut up: in a healthy conversation, with no one trying to WIN THE ARGUMENT, this cartoon should be both cell colors freely mixing with each other — not «converting» or merging with one another.

Many pastors and professors muddy the water with irrelevant arguments to win the approval of the culture.

I tell them that they can win every argument that they have with a book, because the author is not in a position to argue back.

But my best guess is that the Nobel Prize - winning economist would have no problem in principle with the argument that the way to help the poor would be to expand their ownership of, and access to, capital.

... and I can see that senility has you thinking you won with insults alone and not offering a argument.

lol... Hey, if you can't win the next argument, just threaten with Hell maybe?

From the perspective of our findings, either option seems plausible, and depends on winning the values argument with a relatively small number of voters.

Persons such as yourself who have a similar predisposition of course will side with someone ho supports your view and pretend they are objective but honesty is never as important as winning the argument when it comes to discrediting Christ.

To suggest that sexual orientation may be intertwined with nurture, trauma, experience or desire is to complicate the victories the LGBTQ community has won using this civil rights argument.

Maybe you were hoping that once and for all someone had figured out a winning argument... wrong Maybe you were hoping that you could finally rest with your condition... wrong

Even Sarah, who is described in 1 Peter 3:1 as the model of submission, won a rather fateful argument with Abraham about the future of Hagar and Ishmael (Genesis 21:10 - 12).

Instead, this church took the city to court, and won with the argument that feeding the poor and advocating for their well - being is central to the mission of the Church.