Sentences with phrase «winning money because»

During a press conference on Monday, Miner refuted Cuomo's claim and said it is «far from accurate» to say that Syracuse won the money because it agreed to consolidate everything.

Not exact matches

One of my early students, Adam McKay [who went on to direct the Oscar - winning movie The Big Short] was sleeping on my couch for six months, because he wasn't making enough money to continue performing.

It's the Pareto efficiency at work — ESPN wins because it gets users watching more of its video, cellphone providers win because they get more money and consumers win because they don't have to pay anything extra.

He described it as a win for the president because it boosts Defense Department funding, authorizes more money to fight the opioid crisis and puts more money toward border enforcement.

Financials tend to win because it allows them to lend out money at higher rates.

If both sides, through their eyes and their people's eyes, have concluded that the plaintiff is absolutely going to win this case, and the plaintiff is going to get a lot of money because they're totally on board with everything that has been presented, then that might be a good reason for the defendant to agree to a settlement with the plaintiff for less money than the potential exposure if the jury comes back and finds willful infringement.

They worked hard to earn their money — they didn't inherit it or win it in the lottery — and because it wasn't handed to them they believe that it shouldn't simply be handed to others.

Nix: Well, I think I think it was extremely pivotal because when Trump won the nomination he had very, very little money.

While she and her female partners were fund - raising in March, one investor told them that they should marry for money, that he liked it when women fought back because he would always win, and that they needed more attractive photos of themselves in their presentation.

While predatory pricing technically remains illegal, it is extremely difficult to win predatory pricing claims because courts now require proof that the alleged predator would be able to raise prices and recoup its losses.405 Revising predatory pricing doctrine to reflect the economics of platform markets, where firms can sink money for years given unlimited investor backing, would require abandoning the recoupment requirement in cases of below - cost pricing by dominant platforms.

Then they lean on President Obama and Tim Geithner to tell the Europeans: «You have to make Greece pay, so that we win the bets that we've made, because if we lose the bets, then we go under and the stock market crashes, and a lot of people can't collect on their money market funds.»

This is because you only need to predict the direction of the market (higher or lower) in order to win money.

If, on the other hand, you win a trade, the amount of money invested on the next trade increases because your account balance has increased.

To say «Hey, you just won the biggest lottery in the universe but you need to give all that money to us because after you die, then you'll really see something special!

Jesus is indignant that the scribes and Pharisees (1) will not enter the kingdom of heaven themselves and stand in the way of others entering it as well; (2) will do almost anything to win a proselyte only to make that proselyte twice as much a child of hell as they are; (3) confuse people by senseless oaths, telling them that if they swear by the Temple, their oath is not binding, but if they swear by the gold of the Temple, it is binding - the fools ought to realize, Jesus says, that the Temple includes all that is in it; (4) tithe some of their money but neglect justice and mercy and faith, which are weightier moral matters, when they ought both to tithe and perform these greater acts of righteousness as well; (5) are careful about outward cleanliness but careless about the inward disposition, so that they are filled with extortion and greed; (6) appear righteous but really are hypocrites, because their appearance hides all manner of iniquity inside; (7) pretend to revere the prophets of history whom their parents killed but continue to practice the evil of their parents by rejecting those whom God sends to them now (Matt.

That's why it's important to have an unpaid clergy, because sooner or later there will have to be a choice between worshiping God or worshiping the money, and 99.99999 % of the time the money will win.

It's a win - win because fishermen are making more money on their total catch, and we have introduced new species into the marketplace.

I'd predict that you'll win your money back because Myron Mixon is absolutely one of the best ever and you will learn a ton from him.

Sanchez must ask himself what kind of «circus» he has entered... I am not going to say he does not want to win trophy, but money (we have double his wages) was a big factor because, as far as competing for the highest accolades, he can just forget about that.

We're never going to win the league again under Wenger, i'd put money on that, and the simple reason is because he lives in 2004 and under the belief that the Invincibles team can be recreated by playing the same way.

«It's so important to me, first, because it pays the highest prize money ever offered and, second, because I want to see if I can win the toughest one after a long exhausting season.»

You don't win the title even if everybody else is terrible when you are Wenger, because you are simply a deluded old man that doesn't know what to do, but gets paid incredible money.

in order to get better money and most importantly trophies (unless we win the league because frankly who gives a twat about a fa cup?).

That's why the Niners are so high — it's because a bunch of silly Niner fanboy money is on them to go all the way so they lower the odds to make it less enticing to bet more on them and / or decrease the payout if they do win the SB.

Should he be sacked for the previous 8 years because he won nothing with less money than others?

Agreed wenger has done incredibly with little money and whatever financial situation we are in is because of him, but now we need and want to win right?

The League Route comprises those teams that that couldn't manage to win anything, yet who get invited along to the jamboree because there's only so much money to be made from the champions of Latvia playing the champions of Estonia, and a Gazprom don't come for free.

Arsenal dose not like to spend crazy money and I don't think that is the reason why they haven't won the premier league, it is more because of Arsene Wenger's rigid style (until recently) that other teams are used to and can easily defend against.

something does nt make sense to me (actually a lot of things): i would love to have a 1:1 conversation with wenger: why is he doing this (not buying WC players while we have money in the bank): is it really because he thinks we can win without such investment?

David Dein brought Usmanov on board because he knew this Russian (like others we know in the PL) is highly competitive and would want to put as much money in the club as needed to win the PL.

I just hope it not because of money but them believing we can compete to win things because it just mean they wouldn't care too much if we keep loosing.

Many of these fans who lay heavy odds shrug their shoulders if they see themselves losing money because they know that their team seems to be winning around 60 % of the time (even as their bankrolls dwindle).

And to add to that like I have been saying it's not about the money - like Henry said may be top players don't want to come because we don't ever win anything!

Everyone thought that Alexis was wanting to move to Man City because he wanted to win trophies, but Wenger has now confirmed that it was purely for the money, in fact even Manchester City refused to give in to his demands.

Only 3 wins in entire season on road... Burnley is just 2 points behind Arsenal... To what level Arsenal have dropped themselves by not changing hands of Management in crucial times... There was a time when Top Managers in Europe would have agreed to join Arsenal because Arsenal were really top but now why Likes of Ancelloti or Allegeri, and other top managers would think of Arsenal as we don't even have money like Chelsea and Man City to pursue them.....

Correction The initial fee paid for Di Maria was 25 million Euros, Which at that time when the value of the Euro was half of the pound (I know this because i was in Portugal, when this news broke) equates to around 12.5 Million, Plus a further 11 Million Euros # 6.5 Million If he won a title in his first season which they did, So all in all 19 Million pounds (Wow what a tremendous amount of money to spend, Jesus Andy Caroll cost more than him in the same god damn season)... Falcao's had a release clause of 45 Million, One which they paid money to him and his agent in order to instill in his contract, This is a sour note for most Porto fans because, he jumped ship having signed a 5 year deal In July and he left in August for less money for his buy out clause.

It's either that or the board are not willing to spend money to win the league because of Kroneke and the manager is taking the blame for it.

It's all about money now for the shareholders this club will never win lg or Champs lg because they don't want to spend big they just want to get in top 4 and mix with the best with cheap buys.

i understand how Mayweather is entertaining this idea because of the money on the table, but i wish he would entertain the possibility of fighting Bud instead... now THAT fight will either be the biggest ass - whooping he'll receive or the most inspirational win he'll ever eke out.

Between Lukaku and Morata, well Morata wins out for me because the Everton are attaching silly money to Lukaku... at above 60M he is not worth going for.

Just something to think about and to kick around... Arsenal would be a great club if AW was replaced, the Directors left The team was totally replaced... because they're all AW's players and thus mediocre We could find another T. Henry, Vieira, Pires and co We could use all the money to buy the best players in the world Just these small changes would GUARANTEE a continuous stream of PL and EC wins Shame our club would still be stuck with its c..

Speaking of new kits, if looks could win matches, NYC FC manager Patrick Vieira could give his former «Invincibles» squad a run for their money, because the newly - designed NYC FC away kit is truly a sight to behold.

I love Barcelona always will and been loving this club since the Ronaldinho days, but it's been about 2 to 3 years now that this club is showing stupidity and no ambition whatsoever, bad signings, a dumbass coach that has never won anything important, and loosing the future of soccer and not realizing it, also used that money on a player that gets benched for champions league??? This is driving me crazy the more I think bout it, I'm so sad and still so hurt, Iama wach the game because of the love I have for this club, but honestly I don't see our ambition, we have Messi another two to three years, please Barca don't fuck those years up I beg you!!!!

He doesn't want to spend anything because he is happy with his returns... He doesn't have ambition to win PL or CL... There is difference between owner of Man Utd and Arsenal... Man Utd is also having Business money unlikely Chelsea and Man City who are having oil money in their Bank accounts....

Well if we failed we won't have won a trophy last season (FA cup would be used to blood youngsters), we won't have players like Alexis and Ozil come into the club, and we definitely would not be able to keep players like Cazorla, Walcott and Ramsey because we would probably be playing Europa league (or even not been in Europe) and still have probably 5 more years to go in paying of the stadium because we are not getting enough money into the club (no Champions league).

The only reason why Man City and Chelsea have won the league recently and been doing slightly better than Arsenal, is because they have super rich owners who have pumped bottomless pits of money into their clubs.

The board don't give a sh!t bout winning anything they only care about keeping the share price high and their bank balances in the six figure region Wenger has only kept his job because he does what the board expects and that's keeping us competitive WITHOUT actually winning anything too serious and WITHOUT spending too much money Now here's the teal nasty bit imagine if we won the EPL the next thing the fans would expect is the CL and to win that we'd need to spend big far bigger than we ever have oh no far better to just make 4th each season and see the money roll right in to the boards pockets and f@ck what the fans think

I keep hearing we should forgo the money, because keeping Sanchez gives us a great chance at winning the league, or CL qualification (which is Wenger's number one target), but everyone keeps forgetting he just had the best season of his entire career, and yet we still finished fifth, and were utterly humiliated in Europe.

I consider that a win because we have to pay the Mack and that's where our money should go.

Missing out on CL isn't the end of the world, because the money we get from PL sponsorship is far more, and we're never going to win CL with wenger anyway...