Sentences with phrase «winning party in that case»

The winning party in that case had been very careful about setting up its system of assignment of copyright, and it worked.

Not exact matches

In some cases, it is true that agreements are win - win and both parties gain.

It's an impossible feat to calculate which party is «priced into the market» to win the November election, or how shares would react in the case of an upset to that view.

After the June 1953 uprising in East Germany, the secretary of the communist party's writers union distributed leaflets declaring that the people had lost the confidence of the government and it would take redoubled efforts to win it back ¯ to which Brecht responded, «Would it not be easier in that case for the government to dissolve the people and elect another?»

In which case I see three choices: get on with the party and live it up because this is it, blow your brains out since your life is meaningless, or try to be the fittest and decimate those around you (One with the most toys wins).

Since the case pirate parties in Europe have won seats in Sweden, Germany and Iceland.

For example, if the default is to favor the defending party, then you might see anti-abortion lawyers taking the pro-abortion side in a case hoping for a tie that would give the anti-abortion side the effective win.

That's actually more of a threat in Arcuri's case, where the WFP has actually had discussions with a potential challenger, Les Roberts, who dropped out of the 2006 primary to clear the field for Arcuri and improve the party's chances of winning a long - held GOP seat.

Maybe in that case the candidate who comes second would have the choice of deducting their final tally from the winning candidates votes in parliament or distributing their final tally to strengthen other representatives, e.g. of their own party from other seats.

It's designed to detect cases in which one party may have won, widened or retained its grip on power through political gerrymandering.

A win by Gonzalez would help re-establish the WFP in Albany and also solidify its standing in NYC as a vehicle for reform against the well - established so - called Democratic «machines» in the outer boroughs — particularly Brooklyn and, in the case of the 2009 NYC Council elections, in which the WFP teamed up with HTC and 1199 against party - backed candidates, Queens.

Two years ago, the party helped progressive Democrats win a number of legislative primaries, in some cases against incumbents.

The forecasting model works by combining the number of seats won by parties in the previous election with vote intentions data from polls conducted six months prior to the election — in this case the data is from November 2014.

Apart from ability, and in some cases, a talent for intrigue, all failed to win over the majority of their parliamentary colleagues or their Party at large.

Both of the Michigan Libertarian Party ballot access cases are still actively trying to win a court ruling that will make it possible for voters to vote «Libertarian» for President without the need to cast a write - in vote.

The only winning case on this issue came in 1983 from the Alaska Supreme Court, which in Vogler v Miller struck down the old law requiring a party to poll 10 % for Governor to remain on the ballot.

Previous polling has suggested that the Lib Dems could indeed do very well in an early election fought around the issue of Brexit, and I think that is the case (especially if they are the only explicitly pro-membership party and can win pro-European support from Labour).

In cases where party support fell to as low as 4 % or 5 % nationally, as in the case with the April 19th Irish Times - Ipsos MRBI poll, Labour would face a struggle to win seats in every constituency in the state, even in their strongest areaIn cases where party support fell to as low as 4 % or 5 % nationally, as in the case with the April 19th Irish Times - Ipsos MRBI poll, Labour would face a struggle to win seats in every constituency in the state, even in their strongest areain the case with the April 19th Irish Times - Ipsos MRBI poll, Labour would face a struggle to win seats in every constituency in the state, even in their strongest areain every constituency in the state, even in their strongest areain the state, even in their strongest areain their strongest areas.

In cases where party support fell to as low as 4 % or 5 % nationally, Labour would face a struggle to win seats in every constituency in the state, even in their strongest areaIn cases where party support fell to as low as 4 % or 5 % nationally, Labour would face a struggle to win seats in every constituency in the state, even in their strongest areain every constituency in the state, even in their strongest areain the state, even in their strongest areain their strongest areas.

The popular party winning in Spain unconditionally since 2011 even when having more than 1000 open corruption cases.

Grimm defeated Democratic incumbent Rep. Michael McMahon — now the borough's district attorney — in the Tea Party wave of 2010 and easily won re-election in 2014 while under federal indictment in the tax case, claiming his innocence and charging he was the victim of a politically motivated prosecution.

In this case the tactic maintained some proportionality by bypassing the 5 % threshold, but is largely disfavoured by the public due to it awarding smaller parties extra list seats while parties with a higher party vote percentage that don't win an electorate receive no seats; this occurred in 2008 when ACT was awarded 5 seats on the back of one electorate seat and 3.7 % of the party vote, while New Zealand First with no electorate seats and 4.1 % of the party vote were awarded nonIn this case the tactic maintained some proportionality by bypassing the 5 % threshold, but is largely disfavoured by the public due to it awarding smaller parties extra list seats while parties with a higher party vote percentage that don't win an electorate receive no seats; this occurred in 2008 when ACT was awarded 5 seats on the back of one electorate seat and 3.7 % of the party vote, while New Zealand First with no electorate seats and 4.1 % of the party vote were awarded nonin 2008 when ACT was awarded 5 seats on the back of one electorate seat and 3.7 % of the party vote, while New Zealand First with no electorate seats and 4.1 % of the party vote were awarded none.

A statistical analysis of possible primary results by FiveThirtyEight previewed what the national write - ups will say in the case of such a result: «Winning only 70 percent of the vote would mean that voters in his party don't like Cuomo much more than voters in general do.

He cast doubt on the concessions offered by the government whereby parliament would authorise the extended detention on a case - by - case basis by comparing it, rather implicitly, to the manner in which the Commons vote had been won last month using Democratic Unionist party MPs.

Wrong winners Under FPTP there can be cases in which a party can have the most votes but end up winning fewer seats than one or more of its rivals.

Golub is a high - profile lawyer who has won multi-million-dollar cases and has represented not only the state employee union coalition, but also the state Democratic party in its ongoing legal battle against the State Election Enforcement Commission over the legality of financing of Gov. Dannel P. Malloy's re-election campaign.

The country became more polarised between the two largest parties in 2015 than was the case at any previous post-1945 election: the Conservatives and Labour have more Very Safe seats than before, and are contesting fewer marginal ones — and of the 56 seats won by the SNP in 2015, 28 are classified as Very Safe and a further 18 as Safe.

Let no one be deceived, the ability of the All Progressives Congress, APC as a party that can win election in any part of Nigeria with the intervention of state apparatus now is in serious doubt.In most cases, supporters of the once unassailable party are wondering how they have been hoodwinked into accepting the APC which campaigned with a promise of change and a better deal for the people.In fairness, it is not that the manifesto of the party or its constitution is faulty.

It's an impossible feat to calculate which party is «priced into the market» to win the November election, or how shares would react in the case of an upset to that view.

Ansley quotes Cao Siyuan, the father of Chinese bankruptcy law, on the fate of foreign litigants: «It is absolutely impossible for a foreign party to win a case against a Chinese party in a Chinese court.»

In King County Superior Court, a case had to be stayed while a party sought new counsel after their attorney acknowledged that he falsified a memo and emails before turning them over to plaintiffs in a nationwide class - action lawsuit.7 Similarly, this spring, U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan, in a 500 - page opinion, blasted a legal team (who previously had «won» a $ 19 billion judgment in an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.&raquIn King County Superior Court, a case had to be stayed while a party sought new counsel after their attorney acknowledged that he falsified a memo and emails before turning them over to plaintiffs in a nationwide class - action lawsuit.7 Similarly, this spring, U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan, in a 500 - page opinion, blasted a legal team (who previously had «won» a $ 19 billion judgment in an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.&raquin a nationwide class - action lawsuit.7 Similarly, this spring, U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan, in a 500 - page opinion, blasted a legal team (who previously had «won» a $ 19 billion judgment in an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.&raquin a 500 - page opinion, blasted a legal team (who previously had «won» a $ 19 billion judgment in an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.&raquin an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.»

Parties (typically plaintiffs) are given up - front cash in exchange for a portion of their payout from a case when they win.

by two law professors with a bent for political science and empirical research on the judiciary — suggests that if trends continue, Trump might fare no better than Obama, who had a win rate of 50.5 percent in cases in which the federal government was a party.

Once insolvency proceedings have commenced we act in both funded and speculative cases — on a conditional fee agreement basis («no win no fee»)-- for insolvency practitioners in investigating and bringing proceedings under the Insolvency Act against both directors and third parties.

By contrast, placing special attention on litigation of «close cases» that «meaningfully clarify» copyright law could potentially discourage parties from litigating the kinds of cases that «clarify» copyright law: Fee awards in «close cases» potentially «enhance the penalty for a defeat,» in cases which, by nature «no party can be confident... he will win or lose.»

At The Cochran Firm, The verdicts and settlements obtained by our criminal defense and personal injury attorneys in Miami, Ft. Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Fort Myers and throughout Florida are proof of our decades - long track record of winning tough cases and bringing negligent and / or guilty parties to justice or making them compensate those they injured.

The importer appealed to the Supreme Court, which held that in copyright cases the «objective reasonableness» of the losing party's legal position carries «substantial weight» in deciding whether to grant attorneys» fees to the winning party — but that factor alone is not dispositive: a party's litigation misconduct or «repeated» infringement or «overaggressive» enforcement of claims could also justify a fee award even if a party's legal argument was reasonable.

Traditional legal analytics show how often parties or law firms win cases, or the likelihood of winning legal relief in front of a particular judge.

It also presents Outcome Matrices for the cases in your brief that suggest other cases that support them, categorizing them by which party won and whether they followed or distinguished the case you've cited.

The attorneys at Cates Mahoney know how to gather evidence to prove the other party's fault and win you the recovery you deserve, including medical expenses, lost wages, disability, disfigurement, loss of quality of life, emotional distress, pain and suffering, and in some cases, punitive damages.

Kirtsaeng serves as a useful reminder that the winning party in a copyright case can seek to recover its attorneys» fees.

In other words, assuming all disputed facts fall in favor of the non-moving party, the moving party still would win the casIn other words, assuming all disputed facts fall in favor of the non-moving party, the moving party still would win the casin favor of the non-moving party, the moving party still would win the case.

In the California case, the party who won at trial had a judgment dismissing the case, and then suddenly had an order requiring immediate payment of a substantial sum and dispossessing him of his home.

So the case took on a life of its own: the parties were in too deep to settle for a reasonable amount anymore, and they had to essentially double down and try harder to win, just so they could try to win a big costs award at the end of the case.

When Aurora, Ont., mayor Phyllis Morris won a conflict of interest case in March, the losing party was ordered to pay costs of $ 50,850.

In order to win a personal injury case, you must prove that the other party caused your injuries, and the value of your losses.

I've won one case where this happened (where there was extensive email correspondence between business lawyers regarding the changes that would be made in each draft and there the version signed did not correspond to the last version signed electronically in a very long document on paper and there were other indicia of fraud), but by far the more common outcome is to bind the party signing the document (especially in a commercial context) and to consider failing to carefully read all terms of the final draft to be negligent on the part of the party signing the contract.

For those parties in the group litigation who succeed in their individual claims, the logical conclusion is that they have «won» their case and, by extension, payment of their costs should be covered by the «losing» defendant; but in the event that the winning parties ultimately make up a minority of the larger claimant group, it could be argued that, as a whole, the claimants are the «losing» party, responsible for the defendant's costs.

The fact that an answer brief is not filed in an appeal does not mean that the party filing the appeal automatically wins (as would be the case in a civil action in the trial court where the defendant failed to file an answer), but gives rise to a more lenient standard of review than in a contested appeal.

The judge in this case, Mrs Justice Whipple, was tasked with determining, first, which party was to be considered «the winner» in this matter, and second, any potential offsets to the awarding of costs for the winning party.