Sentences with phrase «winning percentage»

A typical book offers games at -110 which requires a 52.38 % winning percentage to break even.

One answer lies in Kenpom.com's Luck metric, where Xavier tops all power conference teams with a +.109 deviation from its expected winning percentage based on its game - to - game efficiencies.

The winning percentage increased by more than 2 %!

Considering that this system has gone 37 - 14 ATS with a 72.5 % winning percentage over the past decade, we love the Fins in this matchup.

While both «Units Won» and winning percentage can be telling when evaluating a group of plays, the sample size (number of plays) is also an important piece of information to look at.

Despite a losing record of 170 - 240 (41.5 % winning percentage), this system has yielded a 15.2 % gain.

The Home Dog produced favorable results: more than a 57 % winning percentage.

We consistently maintain a winning percentage of 54 % -56 % across all major US sports by utilizing statistical methods, economic models and research tools commonly found in the financial world to unlock value in the NCAA Football betting marketplace.

However, some handicappers use these «shortened» Martingale Systems to produce a «sleight of hand», which boosts the winning percentage they are able to publish and promote.

If they were a large favorite (4 + points) that winning percentage takes another substantial jump.

We already knew from last season's analysis that mediocre teams (defined by teams with a winning percentage of less than 60 %) have been undervalued when they square off with the league's elite (opponent winning percentage of at least 60 %).

As a whole, their winning percentage is about 6 % higher than the coaches they replaced.

34 of the 45 teams had a better winning percentage with their replacement coach, which means that 75 % of the time, firing the coach is at least a short - term improvement.

That winning percentage improves by leaps and bounds when that team didn't come close to covering the spread.

Since the league's top teams typically win between 95 - 100 games each season, we decided that team's with a winning percentage of at least 60 % would be considered elite.

Betting on Home Dogs Against the Public (at the 30 % level) resulted in just a 42 % winning percentage at various point spreads in 2008.

This year, the NFL has bounced back strongly, with Sports Insights» Square Plays achieving 69 % winning percentage!

Even though 2005 was a difficult year for dogs, Betting Against the Public in the NFL still shows a 53.6 % winning percentage (compared to 48.3 % for all dogs), since inception three years ago.

SportsInsights» Betting Against the Public methods in the NFL, including Square Plays, Best Bets, and Marketwatch are having a solid season, with Square Plays and NFL MarketWatch producing a combined winning percentage of about 55 %.

Our research showed a direct correlation between lower levels of public support and a higher winning percentage / return on investment.

By consistently gaining that additional line value, bettors can expect to substantially increase their long - term winning percentage.

Yes, this does start at the beginning of the season which technically means that 1 - 0 teams would have a 100 % winning percentage.

This will increase your winning percentage by 3 % -4 % in the long run, and Betting Against the Public works for all major U.S. Sports (NFL, NBA, MLB, NCAAFB, NCAAB, and NHL).

Last season, Sports Insights» contrarian methods of Betting Against the Public, including Square Plays, Best Bets, and Marketwatch had a solid NFL season, producing a combined winning percentage of about 55 % with NFL Squares at 57 %.

This one little filter increased our winning percentage from 54.3 % to 56.8 % while reducing our sample size by nearly 40 %.

His 78th tour triumph — just four shy of Sam Snead's all - time record — coming on his 300th try calculates to a 26 percent career winning percentage.

To do this, we can easily convert a point spread into a winning percentage for every game this year.

As you can see, despite a 41.8 % winning percentage, a $ 100 / game bettor would be up $ 9,264 betting on all teams receiving less than 20 % of moneyline wagers — good for a 4.2 % return on investment.

More specifically, we found that in games where the «opening line» was -3.1 to -8.1 (small home favorites), «betting against the Public» resulted in a 56 % winning percentage and +50 units over the past two seasons.

Last year, NCAA Football Marketwatch posted a solid 56 % winning percentage.

Our research revealed a 52.3 % winning percentage for all 10 + point home dogs, and that percentage escalated as we filtered the games with lower and lower public betting percentages.

In particular, there seems to be some value in the Dallas - Green Bay match - up, as highlighted by our weekly NFL Marketwatch column that has connected for a 65 % winning percentage this year (and several years of consistently positive results).

Getting an extra half - point can increase your long - term winning percentage by 1 - 2 %, which is why we strongly recommend that users have access to three different types of sportsbooks: one square (like Bovada, BetOnline or Sports Interaction), one reduced juice (like 5Dimes or Pinnacle) and one sharp (like Bookmaker / CRIS or The Greek).

Although that winning percentage isn't high enough to overcome that standard -110 juice charged by sportsbooks, it shows that home - court advantage is clearly overvalued.

When adding betting percentage and point spread filters, that winning percentage becomes even greater.

However, even in the case of a handicapper with a long - term expected winning percentage of 55 %, a 70 % win rate over a whole season (with 1,000 plays) would still be a hugely unexpected event.

All 1 - 0 teams would be considered having at least a 60 % winning percentage?

At Vanderbilt since 1999, Stallings has amassed a career record of 332 - 220, good for a.601 winning percentage.

Still probably too early to do too much with team's winning percentage yet, but it has been a soft schedule by any measure.

How else to explain the drought for the driver whose winning percentage ranks second only to Jimmie Johnson among active participants.

Last season, Sports Insights» contrarian methods of Betting Against the Public, including Square Plays, Best Bets, and Marketwatch had a solid NFL season — and produced a combined winning percentage of about 55 %, with NFL Squares at 57 %.

Nothing correlates as well to winning percentage as MOV, but that isn't politically correct.

Looking at over ten years of our data, we've found that teams have gone 191 - 159 ATS (54.6 %) when their winning percentage is less than 60 % and their opponents winning percentage is at least 60 %.

God forbid we end this season's Color Rush schedule on a high note, as two teams with a combined winning percentage of.269 face off tonight at Lucas Oil Stadium.

The overall winning percentage is in the 46 % range, which is profitable because Square Plays are normally on underdogs.

Teams with a winning percentage of greater than 90 % have gone just 25 - 39 ATS in late season games, which indicates that this could be an excellent opportunity to sell high on the Panthers.

Sloan has never had a losing season or failed to make the playoffs in Utah, where, after last Saturday's 97 - 96 win over the Portland Trail Blazers, he had a winning percentage of.672 (715 - 349).

College football has the worst betting against the public results of any sport that we track, and the winning percentage doesn't crack 50 % at any of these typically profitable thresholds.

Since its inception more than six years ago, Sports Insights» popular NFL Marketwatch column has produced a winning percentage of about 57 %.

Mike Gundy: When I took this thing over, I said my goal is, one, to erase a lifetime losing winning percentage here — meaning that, up until a couple of years ago, Oklahoma State has always had a less than 50 percent winning percentage [all - time].