Not exact matches
Alarmists have drawn some support for increased claims of tropical storminess from a casual claim by Sir John Houghton of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) that a warmer world would have more evaporation,
with latent heat providing more energy for disturbances.
It just gives denialists the political ammo to paint legitimate
climate researchers
with the
alarmists / warmists brush.
Paul D... As a part - time
alarmist I would answer that
with a little bit of extrapolation added to some warnings of
climate scientists I guess the worst case scenario at least includes the total collapse of the WAIS, creating tsunamis at least all over the Pacific rim, the subsequent sea level rise of c. 7m will destroy most of the remaining harbours, communication centers near coasts, next up would be the melting of the collapsed ice in the southern ocean altering the
climate of the entire southern hemisphere, making it near - impossible to guess what areas are good for similar agriculture as before, leading to massive movements of people.
That the 2nd paragraph starts
with «Some
climate alarmists» is a clear giveaway.
The willingess of
climate alarmists to beat critics over the head
with such «facts» is what inspires counter-alarmism.
He withdrew any kind of bipartisan support for an ETS (and more)» «two years ago Canadians gave majority government to Stephen Harper's Conservatives, who were pledged to a sensible use of its resources, so Australians have now elected a government
with a pragmatic attitude on global warming» «Led by Christiana Figueres, Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on
Climate Change, an attempt was made, by what can only be described as
alarmists, to exploit these fires for the purposes of the global warming debate.
With the release of the 5000 emails, all of the data and articles provided to support
climate alarmist charges are suspect, and anyone who offers them is not worth taking to time to debate.
But I'm glad to teach you again, because others will see that Maxwell agrees
with me, and does not deny the 2nd Law like you and your fellow
climate alarmists do when you claim that the cold atmosphere transfers more thermal energy / heat to the earth's surface than the Sun does.
«Ah, denialists try...» You continue to peddle your
climate alarmist religion
with dishonest name calling, which shows that you have lost the argument.
Political parties, scientific societies, whole sectors of the publicly funded MSM, all have being corrupted and doing their utmost to destroy freedom of expression and opinion by censoring when it clashes
with their leader's and the
climate alarmist adherents dogma and catastrophe fixated beliefs.
It's enough to make an unemployable
climate alarmist - «journalist» retire to a cabin near Mount Hood and commune
with the squirrels.
Mann and Gore
with the hockey - stick fraud is one of hundreds of such sick
alarmist tricks to build a fake story on man made
climate fiction.
At GelbspanFiles.com, my main focus is to amass a collection of information which shows myriad problems
with the accusation that skeptic
climate scientists are paid industry money to lie and spread misinformation, and myriad problems
with the people surrounding that accusation, including one of the main promulgators of alleged «core evidence» proving it, global
alarmist book author Ross Gelbspan.
But you can NOT support your claims
with empirical data, because just as I pointed out, and you have failed to refute, there isn't a single peer reviewed paper that empirically shows that anthropogenic CO2 was the primary cause of the late 20th century warming like your
climate alarmist religion claims.
Cook and the
climate alarmists try to put anyone who disagrees
with climate change mitigation into this category.
Like Sixties rockers,
climate alarmists seem comfortable
with women as adoring groupies, but don't appear to have much use for them in any other capacity.
* There is too much conflicting evidence about
climate change to know whether it is actually happening * Current climate change is part of a pattern that has been going on for millions of years * Climate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change
and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change to know whether it is actually happening * Current climate change is part of a pattern that has been going on for millions of years * Climate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change is part of a pattern that has been going on for millions of years * Climate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateClimate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateClimate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateClimate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateClimate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climateclimate change
That's easy to do
with the year 1300, but lately there's been some evidence to suggest that, because the actual
climate has spent the entire 21st century refusing to follow the
alarmist models and broil the planet, NOAA and NASA have had to resort to cooling the recent past - ie, not the pre-thermometer millennium - old past but the weather - station recorded - temperature living - memory past.
Like Greenland and the Little Ice Age, glaciers aren't cooperating
with climate alarmists either, though glacier retreat is supposedly a harbinger of doom for our warming planet.
The horse goes down and Arnold dispatches Anthony
with a scythe - like weapon, to the cheers of the
climate alarmists.
The problem
with the oft - proposed carbon tax is that pollution would not be reduced because carbon dioxide CO2 is not a pollutant despite the endless propaganda by
climate alarmists to the contrary.
In an interview
with InsideClimate News, Taylor said the material would act as «a nice counterweight» to material
with «an overtly political and
alarmist message in regards to
climate change.»
USCAN and CAN - I operate full - time programs to influence global policy on
climate change
with alarmist views.
Obviously
climate alarmism has nothing to do
with «science» and everything to do
with what the
alarmists want to believe and want everyone else to believe as well.
By the way, does anyone out there still believe that the
Climate Commission isn't just a mouthpiece for trumpeting Labor government policy, staffed as it is by a team of
alarmists with not one single person in the clique to challenge the orthodoxy or put a contrary view?
I don't know if I've ever seen a state legislator go toe - to - toe on the
climate change issue
with an
alarmist, but the Fox News affiliate in Salt Lake City caught that very thing on camera this week.
The
Climate Commission didn't have one single climate realist on board, and was stacked with Australia's worst alarmists, Will Steffen, David Karoly and Flannery h
Climate Commission didn't have one single
climate realist on board, and was stacked with Australia's worst alarmists, Will Steffen, David Karoly and Flannery h
climate realist on board, and was stacked
with Australia's worst
alarmists, Will Steffen, David Karoly and Flannery himself.
Some weeks ago I reported here on how Hans - Joachim Schellnhuber, the
alarmist director of the Potsdam Institute, appeared on a leading German talk show together
with Swiss meteorologist Jörg Kachelmann and others to discuss
climate change and the rash of storms that had hit the Atlantic and North Sea.
Residents at risk need merely make the same arguments as the
climate alarmists re: the precautionary principle and «fairness» —
with «geographical» rather than «generational» arguments (that is: «your neighbor's lives will be ruined» rather than «your children's lives will be ruined»)
Since I think that AGW can be prevented
with only a modest expenditure, I think you are
climate change economic
alarmist.
By 2015 and especially 2020, it will be obvious to anyone
with a brain that the
Alarmists have got it wrong, as the
climate continues not to play along
with their simplistic, biased computer models.
Consistent
with this axiom,
climate change
alarmists, who believe that humans are destroying the Earth and its atmosphere, can not suspend their belief even as the peer - reviewed science to the contrary mounts.
Global warming
alarmists claim that such incidences have nothing to do
with a
climate trend.
Earlier last year, following an article reviewing 6 (also
alarmist) books on the environment including Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth, Nicholas Stern's report, and George Monbiot's Heat, we discovered that, inconveniently, May had taken a few liberties
with the facts himself, citing a single study, referenced in the Stern Report to make the claim that» 15 — 40 per cent of species «were vulnerable to extinction at just 2 degrees of warming, and that oil companies were responsible for a conspiracy to spread misinformation, and prevent action on
climate change.
The primary current problem is that the
climate alarmists are creating enormous problems in the generation and use of reliable energy necessary for the development and even the continuation of modern civilization,
with adverse effects on the economy, human welfare, and even the environment, all for no significant benefits to anyone except vendors of renewable energy facilities.
Washington Post: «Skeptic firebrand» Morano praises recession's impact on
climate reporting: «Environmental journalism has improved dramatically
with these cut - backs and the loss of these activist reporters... got rid of some of their
alarmist reporters»
Fortunately,
climate alarmist policies are not well advanced in the US,
with some exceptions such as California.
in one day over the global warming
alarmists «Splattergate» film featuring skeptical children being blown up by their teacher for refusing to go along
with climate edicts.
You have been in the
climate debates for years yet only now you are discovering that
Alarmists will not touch empirical studies of phenomena such as the AMO
with a ten foot pole?
I'm hoping that someone will create a post
alarmist narrative that
with attract the majority of the scientifically literate and cut out of the debate the extreme
alarmists and the extreme
climate change skeptics.
Paul Driessen — September 23, 2013 «The real
climate change «deniers» are the
alarmists who deny that natural forces still dominate weather and
climate events, and refuse to acknowledge that thousands of scientists do not agree
with IPCC proclamations and prescriptions.»
Just as
with the extreme events that caused chaos in New Orleans, foresight might well have prevented the devastation in Australia, which some
alarmists are now trying to link to
climate change.
Accordingly
climate alarmists have circled the wagons and refused to debate
with climate skeptics, preferring hit pieces such as Years of Living Dangerously.
But the ranks of
climate alarmists are filled
with legions of scientific ignoranti who blindly see such coastal erosion as another «proof» of impending CO2 - caused
climate hell.
Or, if you want another burrowing mammal analogy, being a
climate skeptic has become a giant game of Wack - a-Mole,
with each day bringing a new flawed argument from
alarmist that must be refuted.
Climate alarmists can not argue the science, so you just defame them with smears like «climate denial&
Climate alarmists can not argue the science, so you just defame them
with smears like «
climate denial&
climate denial».
I would like to think that had he still been alive he would have been disgusted
with the behaviour of the
climate alarmists, but we can never really know.
Want to win an argument
with a
climate alarmist?
Marita Noon — Canada Free Press — January 26, 2014 The current cold covering a large portion of the country has, once again, brought out the
climate change
alarmists with claims of «serious threat.»
Writing at Townhall, Wojick calls for a «Red Team critique» of the upcoming
Climate Science Special Report (CSSR), which Wojick describes as «an extremely alarmist rendition of what is supposedly happening with Earth's climate.
Climate Science Special Report (CSSR), which Wojick describes as «an extremely
alarmist rendition of what is supposedly happening
with Earth's
climate.
climate.»