Sentences with phrase «with alarmist climate science»

Not exact matches

Obviously climate alarmism has nothing to do with «science» and everything to do with what the alarmists want to believe and want everyone else to believe as well.

Consistent with this axiom, climate change alarmists, who believe that humans are destroying the Earth and its atmosphere, can not suspend their belief even as the peer - reviewed science to the contrary mounts.

Climate alarmists can not argue the science, so you just defame them with smears like «climate denial&Climate alarmists can not argue the science, so you just defame them with smears like «climate denial&climate denial».

Writing at Townhall, Wojick calls for a «Red Team critique» of the upcoming Climate Science Special Report (CSSR), which Wojick describes as «an extremely alarmist rendition of what is supposedly happening with Earth's climate.Climate Science Special Report (CSSR), which Wojick describes as «an extremely alarmist rendition of what is supposedly happening with Earth's climate.climate.»

Denialism's Alarmism's predetermined conclusions are, of course, utterly at odds with scientific rationality... and this is why Climate Etc committed denialists alarmists are implacably hostile to all forms of science.

Now compound this massive propaganda failure by the anti-growth Democrats with this week's latest climate science news from the world's premier science journal and a leading global warming alarmist scientist: natural ocean oscillations are responsible for Earth's modern temperature changes, not human CO2.

The other tactic often used is to keep repeating the mantra — climate alarmists do that regularly, both repeating their alarmist line and dealing with a setback by repeating a phoney positioning line such as «Climategate didn't change the science» (merely discreditted their version of it; — RRB -.

But the climate boffins don't really have much interest in testing their hypotheses in the real world anymore as nearly every time they do it disagrees with the alarmist narrative - science that pays the rent.

But I had to laugh when comment # 14 at RC provided this link: http://www.abc.net.au/rn/scienceshow/stories/2010/2992897.htm#transcript It is to the ABC Science Show's 35 year celebration program where climate alarmist and ABC Science editor Robyn Williams, in a moment of self congratulation posted an interview with Peter Ritchie - Calder from 1975.

Along with the sheer unpleasantness of the moderators at Real Climate and other alarmist blogs, the Guardian's practice of summarily banning anyone who does not follow exactly the party line as laid down by the Klimatariat has driven more people to become sceptics than any deep study of the science ever has.

Says the Leftist bedwetter who regards the specious alarmist drivel of Abrahams and Nutticelli of the Guardian as absolute authority on just about everything to do with climate «science»...

Note with pity the attempted insult from the brain - damanged alarmist, trying here to associate decline - hiding, data - hiding, email - deleting, vested - interest climate «science», with the hard science of physics.

This edition has been revised and reformulated with a new chapter template of short chapter introductions, study questions at... View Details Global Warming - Alarmists, Skeptics and Deniers: A Geoscientist Looks at the Science of Climate Change by G. Dedrick Robinson (Author), Gene D. Robinson III (Author) Global Warming - Alarmists, Skeptics & Deniers: A Geoscientist looks at the Science of Climate Change, brings a unique geological perspective to this politically charged issue, a perspective that has been ignored far too long.

I don't think you do justice to the work of people like McIntyre and how their interaction with the hockey team and alarmist blogs such as Real Climate was instrumental in raising serious questions about the quality of the science underlying the dogma.

I wonder how much of this occurs with climate science — in particular the alarmist bits: those portions of study which expound the most alarmist results, et al..

In climate change, there is a political agenda with its necessary junk science propaganda and alarmist claims.

That would be a very significant scientific contribution, and in my humble opinion much more worth it than slaying some climate alarmist dragons that constantly contaminate the paleoclimatology with sloppy science.

Then thereâ $ ™ s the pesky issue of â $ œconsensus.â $ Alarmists typically counter any fact - based global warming argument with the assertion that the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has already ruled on the issue, and therefore â $ œthe science is settledâ $ and â $ œthe debate is over.â $ â $ œMild winter temperatures will decrease heavy snowstorms, â $ IPCC claimed in its 2001 Third Assessment.

It is yet more evidence that climate alarmists tend to be apologists for the current science establishment and to be particularly sensitive to anyone asserting that climate science, dealing with very small deltas in a very complex system, might be subject to bias.

Moreover, I have had many arguments with people of an alarmist bent in which it has become obvious that they are keener on a society organised around the authority of climate science than they are keen on understanding precisely what climate science has determined, which is to say that such a position is nakedly «ideological», yet owes very little of its understanding to science.

Only recently, faced with a gap between the climate reality and alarmist theory that was too great to ignore, has official climate science begun to admit the facts to the public.

I wrote something like 3000 words of indignation about climate alarmists corrupting the very definition of science by declaring their work «settled», answering difficult scientific questions with the equivalent of voting, and telling everyone the way to be pro-science is to listen to self - designated authorities and shut up.

Barely has the year begun and already the climate alarmist propaganda machine is up to its old tricks, trying to scare you with made up science stories promising global warming - related doom and gloom...