Sentences with phrase «with apgar»

Life satisfaction was investigated with the APGAR test, psychological dependence, prejudice relationship personality.

Exclusion criteria: infants with birthweight < 2500 g, with Apgar scores < 5, twins, women having operative deliveries, women who did not speak English

Even though she was very healthy for a baby born at 34 weeks, weighing over five pounds and with Apgar scores of eight and eight, she was removed from the delivery room within minutes of her birth, before we were able to initiate breastfeeding.

My son was also born with an APGAR of 2 after a lengthy vaginal labor in the hospital, nearly 10 lbs.

Weighing in at a healthy 3950g (8lb11oz) and with Apgar scores of 9, this girl was already proving everyone wrong!

Uh, all my kids were born at home with an APGAR of 10.

She weighed 7 lbs 11.2 ounces and was 21inches long, with an APGAR score of 8/9.

With an Apgar of one it was silent but for the squeak of theatre crocs on the floor.

I don't know (and other people here do), but I do know that, per the Grunebaum paper, if a baby is born with an APGAR of 0 far from qualified personnel to resuscitate him / her, their prognosis is as grim as it can possibly be.

The baby was blue and not breathing, with an Apgar score of 3.

So, yes, I do have an idea, my one nephew was still born, in a hospital at 38 weeks (not the hospitals fault, it was ob negligence, he died 2 weeks earlier) and their next child was delivered by c - section which was considered «emergency» even though she was made to wait 45 minutes before they could operate, and baby was born not breathing, with an apgar of 2 and has cerebral palsy.

their next child was delivered by c - section which was considered «emergency» even though she was made to wait 45 minutes before they could operate, and baby was born not breathing, with an apgar of 2 and has cerebral palsy

He was born with no APGAR, was resuscitated and kept in NICU for almost a week to assess damage.

She was born with an Apgar of three.

With the APGAR test, a baby's score can vary from 0 - 10 — usually anything above 7 is considered healthy.

Tell that to the NURSE who told me if I didn't let her give me Pitocin that my baby would be born «with apgars of zero — that means dead.»

She complains that the press release (out of Cornell) conflates stillbirth with Apgars of 0.

Not exact matches

Landon was born full term, with a healthy weight and a good APGAR score, but wanted to nurse constantly.

May you be one of the women who has a not very painful 10 hour labor, delivers a baby with 9/10 apgars, and departs the hospital thinking, «What was all the fuss about?»

Especially with planned cesarean, some babies will inadvertently be delivered prematurely.1 Babies born even slightly before they are ready may experience breathing and breastfeeding problems.21 One to two babies per 100 will be cut during the surgery.33 Studies comparing elective cesarean section or cesarean section for reasons unrelated to the baby with vaginal birth find that babies are 50 % more likely to have low Apgar scores, 5 times more likely to require assistance with breathing, and 5 times more likely to be admitted to intermediate or intensive care.4 Babies born after elective cesarean section are more than four times as likely to develop persistent pulmonary hypertension compared with babies born vaginally.17 Persistent pulmonary hypertension is life threatening.

She was born healthy with 9/9 APGAR and needed no nicu.

She had a little trouble breathing and so had an Apgar score initially of 5 but as soon as they bulb suctioned she did breathe and she ended up with a 9 five minutes later.

Nurse - midwives demonstrated with a high grade level of evidence a lower rate of cesarean sections, lower apgar scores, lower labor augmentation, lower episotomy rates, equivalent low birthrates, lower vaginal operative deliveries, less use of labor analgesia and epidurals, and lower rates of third - and fourth - degree perineal lacerations.

Being able to take baby over to the warmer quickly, assess baby, give baby some APGAR scores and then get baby back to mom's chest it doesn't interfere with my operation and it doesn't interfere necessarily with what the anesthesiologist is trying to make sure that mom is doing ok.

And all she has to show for it is my normal, annoying little brother and a big scar... those horrible interventions resulted in a pink, 8 pound screaming baby with good apgars.

My impression for HBs in general is that midwives tend to skew Apgar scores high and that they tend to deal with PPH reactively as opposed to proactively.

I suspect the apgars assigned by a poorly trained birthing helper clown, especially when faced with a lifeless baby, are pretty much just made up.

We analyzed 8 outcomes of child health (neonatal deaths, prenatal deaths, Apgar...», or even «The findings suggest that homebirths attended by midwives may be equally safe if not safer for women with low - risk pregnancies», which could mean «safer for women» who have «low - risk pregnancies» or equally «safer» for «women who have low - risk pregnancies».

Does anyone with medical training think for a second this baby truly had apgars of 5, 6, and 8 prior to trfr?

I was in the hospital so a pediatrician was in the room so when my son was born blue with low apgar score, she and nurses worked on him.

There is simply no way that a higher incidence of neonatal death can not be associated with a higher incidence of low Apgar scores: there must be more near misses in the home birth group.

She seems, elsewhere, to conflate the unreliability of birth certificates in capturing rare events with unreliability of capturing low Apgars.

Saying «Here are 27,000 planned HBs with accurate reporting of APGARS and outcomes, planned place of delivery and type of attendant, and we don't show the same findings as this study».

Babies with a 5 minute Apgar score of zero include those that died intrapartum, but also those that were born without vital signs who were subsequently resuscitated by emergency personnel.

These studies show little difference between epidural and nonepidural (usually opiate - exposed) babies in terms of Apgar score and umbilical - cord pH, both of which reflect the baby's condition at birth.78 However, a large - population survey from Sweden found that use of an epidural was significantly associated with a low Apgar score at birth.79

The posterior position at birth also is associated with a higher risk of short - term complications for the baby, such as lower five - minute Apgar scores, an greater likelihood of needing to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, and a longer hospital stay.

Labor induction has been increasing since the early 1990s, 1 and the rate is running at about 20 % for pregnancies at term.2, 3 Induction of labor compared with spontaneous labor is associated with adverse maternal outcomes, including at least a doubling in the caesarean delivery rate, 4,5 25 — 50 % increase in instrumental vaginal delivery rate, 3,5 higher postpartum hemorrhage rate, 5 and prolonged labor.5 Neonates born after induced labor are more likely to have low Apgar score and low umbilical cord blood pH. 5

This score — developed in 1952 by anesthesiologist Virginia Apgar and now used in modern hospitals worldwide — rates a baby's appearance, pulse, responsiveness, muscle activity, and breathing with a number from 0 to 2 (2 being the strongest rating).

Though this was a relatively small, retrospective study, the results did reveal that women who were given Pitocin to induce or augment their labors did have an increased risk of having a baby with lower Apgar scores or who required admission to the NICU.

Human milk feeding was associated with a 57 % reduction in the odds of infection, in general, controlling for gestational age, mechanical ventilation days, 5 - minute Apgar score, and days without enteral feedings and a 53 % reduction in the odds of sepsis / meningitis, in specific, controlling for gestational age, mechanical ventilation days, and days without enteral feedings.

Human milk feeding was independently associated with a reduced odds of infection (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.24 — 0.87;P =.016), controlling for birth weight, 5 - minute Apgar score, mechanical ventilation days, and days without enteral feedings.

Human milk feeding was independently correlated with a reduced odds of infection (odds ratio [OR] = 0.43; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.23 — 0.81), controlling for gestational age, 5 - minute Apgar score, mechanical ventilation days, and days without enteral feedings; and was independently correlated with a reduced odds of sepsis / meningitis (OR = 0.47, 95 % CI: 0.23 — 0.95), controlling for gestational age, mechanical ventilation days, and days without enteral feedings.

More planned home births had 5 - minute Apgar score less than 4 (0.37 %) compared with hospital births (0.24 %; adjusted OR, 1.87; 95 % CI: 1.36 to 2.58) and neonatal seizure (0.06 % versus 0.02 %, respectively; adjusted OR, 3.08; 95 % CI: 1.44 to 6.58).

Landon was born full - term via emergency c - section with a healthy birth weight and strong Apgar scores.

The researchers found that of women who received at least 4 additional hours of oxytocin, 38 % delivered vaginally, and none had neonates with 5 - minute Apgar scores of less than 6.

lion of zion, for the specific population of healthy normal woman with healthy normal pregnancies, they have found that home births actually have better outcomes for both baby and mother — i.e. better apgars, better weight gain after the birth, and other indicators of maternal and baby wellbeing.

Her average mother is 28 years old, gains 35 pounds, has her 3rd baby at 41 weeks, weighing 8 pounds 5 ounces, with a 9 - 10 Apgar after 5 hours of labor, 30 minutes of pushing, and no tears.

I've done 3 «phone births», with dads & Grandmother catching baby, 1 in an old hippie bus, 1 by a creek, 4 at my home, a few by myself before my assistant could make it — had a friend write down FHT's, APGARS, times, etc..

The adjusted odds ratio for Apgar scores lower than 7 at 5 minutes in the home birth group compared with physician - attended hospital births was 0.84 (95 % CI 0.32 — 2.19).

Studies that have claimed the safety of out - of - hospital deliveries by using higher mean or high cut - off 5 min Apgar scores and reviews based on these studies should be treated with skepticism by obstetricians and midwives, by pregnant women, and by policy makers.