This behavior is consistent
with Biblical authority.
Not exact matches
BC I have already corrected your error
with regard to Sodom and Gomorrah and your response, in direct violation to your claim to accept
biblical authority, was that regardless YOU believe what you want to about it anyway.
One thing that often throws people off when I write is that I will sometimes discuss my beliefs from a position of
biblical authority when I am speaking
with one who has that belief system.
I accept the Bible's
authority; at the same time I have wondered — as
with suicide — about a precise identification of every person of this type
with the
biblical model» («The Bible and Two Tough Topics,» Eternity, August 1974).
It is not enough to receive it as the occasion of an encounter
with God (although it is) or as an invitation to join up
with God's plan for human liberation (also true) or a host of other redefinitions of the nature of
biblical authority.
All of this blue - chip evangelical clout is brought to bear in support of the doctrine of
biblical «inerrancy» against a growing party of theological compatriots inclined to speak more of the «
authority» of Scripture
with regard to «faith and practice.»
The Decade has pointed this out repeatedly to the churches - first that the veneer of silence
with which violence against women is dealt
with is a moral failure of the Church and secondly that outrageous
biblical and theological legitimizations of violence, calling into question the
authority and power of the church, as a moral community.
It is, in particular, the second of evangelicalism's two tenets, i. e.,
Biblical authority, that sets evangelicals off from their fellow Christians.8 Over against those wanting to make tradition co-normative
with Scripture; over against those wanting to update Christianity by conforming it to the current philosophical trends; over against those who view
Biblical authority selectively and dissent from what they find unreasonable; over against those who would understand
Biblical authority primarily in terms of its writers» religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith; over against those who would consider
Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the
Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affirms.
Having come to associate the direct application of Scripture to governance
with violent conflict and political instability, English Protestants were primed to turn to Enlightenment ideals that promised a reasonable path to tolerance and peaceful governance at the expense of
biblical authority.
Thus, rather than place the insights of contemporary society in dialogue
with Scripture and tradition in a way that maintains
Biblical authority, she has compromised the sole
authority of Scripture by qualifying it from feminist perspectives.
It is to take one's commitment to
Biblical authority with increased seriousness.
«58
With the publication of Jewett's book the question of «error» is seen to be a pertinent topic for discussion concerning
Biblical authority, even among those holding to a position of «complete infallibility.»
To support his slurs, Eichenwald first tries to undermine reliance on Scripture as a supreme
authority for moral discernment and then to show how Christians, oblivious to the problems
with biblical inspiration, ignore its clear teaching.
Both have let polemical and apologetic concerns become primary,
with the result that the
authority and truthfulness of the
Biblical text are undermined.
Wisest: Peter Enns
with «Tim Keller on Homosexuality and
Biblical Authority: Different Crisis, Same Problem»
«Because we have forgotten the
biblical concepts of true
authority and submission, or more accurately, have rebelled against them, we have created a climate in which caricatures of
authority and submission intrude upon our lives
with violence.
Ellingsen notes that numerous ecumenical breakthroughs resulted from the Second Vatican Council, but mutual respect does not always bridge the gap between the mainline churches
with their primary commitment to contextual theology, and fundamentalists as well as evangelicals
with their prevailing commitment to
biblical authority.
I keep hoping that evangelicals will not think my work compromises their emphases on the love of Jesus and on
biblical authority, and that liberals will not suppose it is inconsistent
with intellectual openness or commitment to peace and justice.
This
biblical tradition went deep into the collective consciousness of the western world, causing people to believe that the earth was expressly made for the use of humankind,
with the male gender in
authority.
It shouldn't be surprising that apologists will defend
biblical chattel slavery given they are equally willing to defend the slaughter of children and infants; completely disregarding any notion of judgment based on an exercise of free will, completely disregarding any notion of empathy for their suffering, and
with complete rejection of any personal moral culpability in offering their various incarnations of a Nuremberg defense by placing their self - serving deference to perceived
authority over any and all other moral considerations.
Since we have nailed the flag of
biblical authority to the mast of an encounter
with God, we can not avoid asking how one knows he has encountered God.
Best Point (nominated by Micah Odor): John Wilson at The Wall Street Journal
with «No One Reads the Bible Literally» «What is at stake in these disputes is not a choice between following
biblical authority on the one hand or science on the other, as the matter is often misleadingly framed.
These
biblical texts,
with their depictions of Amalek and the Canaanites as subhuman, were not lost to religious
authorities and zealots throughout history: During the Crusades, Pope Urban II considered Muslim conquerors of Jerusalem to be Amalek.
In fact, say
biblical experts, these terms and concepts were already familiar to residents of the Roman Empire who knew them as references to the
authority and divinity of the emperors, beginning notably
with Caesar Augustus before the dawn of the first century.
However, we are also heirs of a false and one sided understanding of the
biblical texts which deal
with the Christian attitude towards a state and
authorities.
In fact, in Recovering
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood — the manual of sorts for the complementarian movement — John Piper provides a continuum along which Christian women (and the Christian men who might employ them) can plot the appropriateness of various occupations along two scales: 1) how much
authority the woman has over men, and 2) the degree to which the relationship is personal between the woman and the men
with whom she works.
Is a fully developed contextualization the opportunity to hear Scripture speak again
with clarity and conviction, or is it the abdication of a commitment to
biblical authority?
According to Christians for
Biblical Equality, egalitarianism holds that «all believers — without regard to gender, ethnicity or class — must exercise their God - given gifts
with equal
authority and equal responsibility in church, home and world.»
Those of us who worked
with him on a daily basis realize it is not a fair assessment of Winter to state, «along
with undercutting the omniscience of God, Winter's open theism would seem to undermine the full
authority of Scripture and emasculate the
biblical gospel.»
This attitude was strongly coupled
with biblical warrant for the Christian's obedient acceptance of appropriate political
authorities.
The twist in Lakeview Terrace is that the bigot front and centre is a black man (named after
Biblical Abel, no less) and that it's all been genre - mixed in the cop - gone - rogue, Internal Affairs / Unlawful Entry tradition, speaking ultimately to the distinct»70s feeling of paranoia towards
authority that's resurfaced in films of the last eight Bush years while trying,
with some success, to refocus racism into generalized rage, confusion, frustration, and intolerance.
Opening
with a ragged VHS, Don Verdean introduces us to its title character (Sam Rockwell), a
Biblical archaeologist whose work in the Holy Land is discredited by
authorities but supported and appreciated by church communities.
The vaunted IPCC process — multitudes of experts from over a hundred countries over a period of four years, examining thousands of refereed journal publications,
with hundreds of expert reviewers — elevated the
authority of the IPCC AR4 to near
biblical heights.