Sentences with phrase «with climatology»

Global Warming has to do with Climatology which involves long term climate trends and influences.

In reality, it hasn't been; it's been on par with climatology... by this date, an average season has had 3 named storms, 1 hurricane, and 0 major hurricanes, which is exactly what 2010 has seen.

The relatively warmest temperatures in the country were observed in the Southwest, though they were not warm compared with climatology.

It should be noted that for comparisons with climatology (Fig. 4 and 5), the reference time frame (i.e., «normal») now extends from 1981 through 2010 and hence includes recent years of substantial summer ice loss (see this NSDIC webpage with an explanation of the change).

Going forward, if we stick with climatology and its 30 year averaging period then in order to provide policy makers with information about the outcomes from their policy decisions we need to come up with independent variable and dependent variable time series that are of much greater duration than the HADCRUT3, for 150 observed events is about the bare minimum for a statistically validated model that predicts with statistical significance.

Fortunately the answers are well known by those familiar with climatology - but for those who are not... well, NOAA needs to do better with State of the Climate 2013.

And like USHCN each datum has a set of flags that indicate quality checks (isolated value, inconsistent with climatology, month has missing days, and so on).

From solar influence weighting to % of white ground cover to when are clouds on the dayside VS lack of clouds on the nightside, we have miles to go before gaining a good understanding of cause and effect with climatology.

David B. Benson — this admittedly still has nothing to do with climatology, but since you speculated, leukemia can easily take as little as 2 - 3 years to develop after exposure to ionizing radiation.

As we've seen time, after time, they simply refuse to accept any criticisms of their methods, processes or results, epsecially from mere bloggers, with no climatology «credentials».

I don't see this in the sea ice records that date that far back (i.e. Chapman and Walsh), but that's in large part because the ice cover has observational gaps and has been filled in with climatology.