«To speak of God's Kingdom,» says Wright in Scripture and the Authority of God, «is thus to invoke God as the sovereign one who has the right, the duty, and the power to deal appropriately
with evil in the world, in Israel, and in human beings, and thereupon to remake the world, Israel, and human beings.»
«To speak of God's Kingdom,» says Wright, «is thus to invoke God as the sovereign one who has the right, the duty, and the power to deal appropriately
with evil in the world, in Israel, and in human beings, and thereupon to remake the world, Israel, and human beings... When full allowance is made for the striking differences of genre and emphasis within scripture, we may propose that Israel's sacred writings were the place where, and the means by which, Israel discovered again and again who the true God was, and how his Kingdom - purposes were being taken forward... Through scripture, God was equipping his people to serve his purposes.»
This two-fold belief seems, prima facie, to be in conflict
with the evil in the world.
It contrasts how religion tells us to deal
with evil in the world, and how God deals
with evil in the world.
According to Wright, «To speak of God's Kingdom is thus to invoke God as the sovereign one who has the right, the duty, and the power to deal appropriately
with evil in the world, in Israel, and in human beings, and thereupon to remake the world, Israel, and human beings.»
- It contrasts how religion tells us to deal
with evil in the world, and how God deals
with evil in the world.
The question is not whether the idea of God's goodness can be made consistent
with the evil in the world granted certain other assumptions such as God's finitude.
He plays Gregg Hurwitz» script completely straight, and what could have been a story about a child unable to come to terms
with evil in the world instead becomes a dehumanizing mess that rides its high concept straight to hell.
Not exact matches
Similarly
in China, there are those who take advantage of every chance to paint the U.S. as a country
with evil intentions toward China and the
world.
This is all about control
with religion and it has to stop.Gay people getting married doesn't have anything to do
with straight people getting married.People are so full of hatred and disrespect it isn't funny.I'm glad this has come out now, because it really shows how
evil people really are.But these people who are so into GOD, the Bible, Church, and the only way of life they live 4 god, by god are the 1s who prmote going around the world starting WARS, killing innocent women, men, children and families because Jesus guides them in everything they do.That is a crock of B.S. if I ever heard it.They will continus to use GOD and continue their EVIL ways to get whatever they want and CONTROL who ever they
evil people really are.But these people who are so into GOD, the Bible, Church, and the only way of life they live 4 god, by god are the 1s who prmote going around the
world starting WARS, killing innocent women, men, children and families because Jesus guides them
in everything they do.That is a crock of B.S. if I ever heard it.They will continus to use GOD and continue their
EVIL ways to get whatever they want and CONTROL who ever they
EVIL ways to get whatever they want and CONTROL who ever they can.
Now I have peace and though this
world burdens me
with its
evil every day, Ifind happiness
in the simple things of Ya's creation.
The simplistic approach seems distracting to the real presence of
evil in the
world — similar to the red «devil»
with the tail and pitchfork.
That is, while Griffin acknowledges that Plantinga affirms limitations on God's power
in relation to possible
worlds containing free human beings, he believes Plantinga to hold «that an actual
world devoid of beings
with some power of self - determination would be possible» and thus that God could have created a
world containing no
evil simply by creating a
world containing no self - determined beings (GPE 271).
With people like you we already have
evil and darkness, we working our way out of it, go away, there's no place for you
in this
world.
Plotinus recast the Platonic unease
with the material
world in a straightforward manner: «The nature of bodies, insofar as it participates
in matter, will be an
evil» (Enneads, 1.8.4).
Considering that all these horrific things
in the bible occur
in close to 4000 years ago
in a time and
world culture you obviously can't be that familiar
with makes you the perfect judge on how
evil the bible is.
In short, if those dissatisfied
with the classical account of nonmoral
evil currently under discussion are not able to present a better
world, «the (classical) theist does not have to show that it was impossible for God to create a better set of
world - constituents or natural laws, or even that this is the best of all possible
worlds» (IPQ 179 - 98).
At baptism, we are anointed
with the Holy Spirit so that we may be soldiers of Christ
in the
world, so that we may fight the forces of sin and
evil.
Through his years
in the earthly hell of the Soviet prison system, to the publication of A Day
in the Life of Ivan Denisovichin 1962, and, later, the multivolume Gulag Archipelago, Solzhenitsyn challenged the
world to look unblinkingly at the good and,
with relentless specificity, the
evil of which we are capable.
For the victim of war struggling to connect
with a God who allows so much
evil in the
world, the bad news is that mankind's rebellion has turned the planet into battlefield; the good news is that God loves the
world and has a plan to ultimately heal, restore, and redeem all of creation.
The immanence of God
in the
world implied
in our metaphor raises the question of God's involvement
with evil.
Thus the traditional conception of deity, which we have received from our past, puts its main stress on divine absoluteness or aseity; on divine causative agency as the explanation of everything that occurs whether by direct divine willing or by indirect divine permission
with respect to
evil done
in the
world; on divine self - containedness and hence lack of necessary relationship
with anything else; on divine impassability, which makes any suffering impossible for God; and on divine moral perfection,
with the giving of laws
in accordance
with which everything should be ordered.
It does imply, however, that unlike God the king, the God who suffers
with the
world can not wipe out
evil;
evil is not only part of the process but its power also depends on us, God's partners
in the way of inclusive, radical love.
Three children experienced a series of extraordinary visions
in 1917 and were given a message that was both extraordinary and very ordinary: people must pray and do penance (that was the ordinary bit; these things are central to Catholic life, always have been and always must be) and failure to do this would ensure that
evils would be spread by Russia across the
world (an extraordinary statement to make to children living
in an obscure corner of Portugal
with limited access to any knowledge of Russia or indeed to anywhere else outside their local area).
In the name of this theology (which is in part that of the World Council of Churches), Christians are induced to participate unreservedly and with a good conscience in political or scientific action; for, they are told, whatever evil there might be in such action will necessarily be overruled by the goo
In the name of this theology (which is
in part that of the World Council of Churches), Christians are induced to participate unreservedly and with a good conscience in political or scientific action; for, they are told, whatever evil there might be in such action will necessarily be overruled by the goo
in part that of the
World Council of Churches), Christians are induced to participate unreservedly and
with a good conscience
in political or scientific action; for, they are told, whatever evil there might be in such action will necessarily be overruled by the goo
in political or scientific action; for, they are told, whatever
evil there might be
in such action will necessarily be overruled by the goo
in such action will necessarily be overruled by the good.
I find, on the contrary, that it is much more difficult today for the knowing person to approach God from history, from the spiritual side of the
world, and from morals; for there we encounter the suffering and
evil in the
world, which it is difficult to bring into harmony
with an all «merciful and almighty God.
If there is free will
in Heaven but no
evil, that goes to show that God can
in fact create
worlds with both free will and no
evil.
Here then is a theology that either means nothing certainly identifiable (without supernatural grace or high genius
in the art of reconnecting
with experience concepts carefully divested of relation to it) or else means that the
world might exactly as well not have existed, or as well have existed
with far more
evil or less good
in it than it actually presents.
So unstinting has been the effort to portray as virtuous the ending of the lives of the weak that it brings to mind Pope Benedict's words to the College of Cardinals
in 2012: «We see how
evil wants to dominate the
world,» he said, and how it uses cruelty and violence, but also how it «masks itself
with good and, precisely
in this way, destroys the moral foundations of society.»
I guess this is directed more at violent anti-abortionists and less towards you that is of the «live and let live» mindset, but what if
with all the
evil thats
in the
world, god is giving us an out by providing us
with the cure and we're misinterpreting this and digging ourselves a deeper hole?
The religious insight is the grasp of truth: that the order of the
world, the value of the
world in its whole and
in its parts, the beauty of the
world, the zest of life, and the mastery of
evil, are all bound up together — not accidentally, but by reason of this truth: that the universe exhibits a creativity
with infinite freedom, and a realm of forms
with infinite possibilities; but that this creativity and these forms together are impotent to achieve actuality apart from the complete ideal harmony, which is God.61
When Adam and Eve misused their wills
in the Garden of Eden by eating fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and
evil, sin entered into the
world, and
with it came death, decay, and destruction.
«When I think all the
evil in the
world, from terrorism, to disease, to famine, I find it horrifying that a man
with the Pope's incredible power and influence can only focus on something as minor as gay marriage,» artist Kevin Sharkey, 47, told the website ClickLiverpool.com
The redefinition of omnipotence and omniscience provide the groundwork for process thought's unique treatment of theodicy, the question of how the concept of an all powerful yet loving God can be reconciled
with the existence of
evil in the
world.
Our best moral theories might seem to entail that nothing could justify God's having created a
world with so much
evil in it.
In this stage of precision, the metaphysical scheme has in an important, reformable way interpreted the final opposites of experience in terms of God and the world: «In our cosmological construction we are left with the final opposites, joy and sorrow, good and evil, disjunction and conjunction — that is to say, the many in one — flux and permanence, greatness and triviality, freedom and necessity, God and the World..
In this stage of precision, the metaphysical scheme has
in an important, reformable way interpreted the final opposites of experience in terms of God and the world: «In our cosmological construction we are left with the final opposites, joy and sorrow, good and evil, disjunction and conjunction — that is to say, the many in one — flux and permanence, greatness and triviality, freedom and necessity, God and the World..
in an important, reformable way interpreted the final opposites of experience
in terms of God and the world: «In our cosmological construction we are left with the final opposites, joy and sorrow, good and evil, disjunction and conjunction — that is to say, the many in one — flux and permanence, greatness and triviality, freedom and necessity, God and the World..
in terms of God and the
world: «In our cosmological construction we are left with the final opposites, joy and sorrow, good and evil, disjunction and conjunction — that is to say, the many in one — flux and permanence, greatness and triviality, freedom and necessity, God and the Worl
world: «
In our cosmological construction we are left with the final opposites, joy and sorrow, good and evil, disjunction and conjunction — that is to say, the many in one — flux and permanence, greatness and triviality, freedom and necessity, God and the World..
In our cosmological construction we are left
with the final opposites, joy and sorrow, good and
evil, disjunction and conjunction — that is to say, the many
in one — flux and permanence, greatness and triviality, freedom and necessity, God and the World..
in one — flux and permanence, greatness and triviality, freedom and necessity, God and the
WorldWorld....
When I face arguments which confidently tell me that all must (metaphysically must) be for the best and then look at the incidence of
evil in the
world, my sympathies are
with Voltaire
in caricaturing the Leibnizian Dr. Pangloss.
The
evil of the
world is that those elements which are translucent so far as transmission is concerned,
in themselves are of slight weight; and that those elements
with individual weight, by their discord, impose upon vivid immediacy the obligation that it fade into night.
This argument is often argued
with atheists...
Evil why would a loving god allow «evil» to run rampant in our wo
Evil why would a loving god allow «
evil» to run rampant in our wo
evil» to run rampant
in our
world.
Hart, who next year will be a visiting professor at Providence College, spoke
with us about
evil and its place
in the
world that God created and loves.
Futhermore, where experience is mixed, as
with our experience of the
world's good and
evil, a priori reasoning can be of considerable importance
in supporting our confidence that some supposed «felt concrete redemption is no illusion but an authentic experience of what really is (and perhaps even must be) the case.
Some of us look forward
with great eagerness and expectation for when Jesus will come again to throw off the
evil governments and set up His own righteous rule, but not before He slays our enemies, kills the wicked, bathes the
world in bloodshed, burns away all those who did not follow Him, and banishes the unrighteous into pits of never - ending fire to suffer and burn for all eternity.
This from reading a book written by men
with an agenda to control the
world with their blatherings, centuries of corrupt,
evil popes leading to King James, who burned women at the stake and believed
in the divinity of kings?
«The theology of love must seek to deal realistically
with the
evil and injustice
in the
world, and not merely to compromise
with them.»
Why as a Christian, are you not standing up to this
evil in this
world with Prayers & Leadership, shining Gods light on their Darkness being executed
in secret right now as the Global Agenda?
Others may say you are a romantic, naïve idealist who underestimates the power and extent of
evil in the
world and what is required to cope
with it.
(he says god didn't create the
world with evil and death
in it till «man'turned away from him, as
in worship me or I'm a gonna smack you upside the head boy which god did
in his
world)
in my
world, it was created, not sure how, big bang..
Choices may be made
in the
world which result
in distortion or blockage; there are
evils, to use the traditional word, which can and do interfere
with the realization of a pattern that is good and right.
As Canon Andrew White (aka the vicar of Baghdad) affirms
in his interview
with us, real
evil is very much alive
in the
world today.
Now
in contrast
with such healthy - minded views as these, if we treat them as a way of deliberately minimizing
evil, stands a radically opposite view, a way of maximizing
evil, if you please so to call it, based on the persuasion that the
evil aspects of our life are of its very essence, and that the
world's meaning most comes home to us when we lay them most to heart.