You seem to have forgotten that McIntyre found problems
with GISStemp too and before the code was released.
What's noteworthy, both charts end
with GISSTEMP symbols.
Before someone is going to say something like Hadley is different than GISStemp etc, My work agrees indirectly
with GISStemp, and above all other reasons, a Density Weighted Temperature of the entire atmosphere would make such surface temperature graphs or projections eventually obsolete.
Not exact matches
That would just lead to confusion, especially
with all the scientific literature that has referenced
GISSTemp.
Continuing on
with the data mining of the
GISSTEMP material, I have been looking for evidence of a heat island effect, and my conclusion is that it won't be found in this data.
I gave that one a shot and came up
with a fairly good correlation
with the published «global»
GISSTEMP anomalies.
Instead they opt for the UHI effected and massively tampered
with,
GISStemp land - based data set.
Your December 23, 2010 at 1:19 am reply starts
with, «And, Bob, to your wish to prevent critique of GISS Tsurf even though its still on NASA
GISStemp frontpage...»
He doesn't say whose data he used but I checked this
with HadCRUT3 and NASA
GISStemp (he cites right wing propaganda site scienceandpublicpolicy.org but they have no obvious temperature data).
said replying to my post «I seem to remember seeing somewhere an archival thing showing
GISSTEMP with a high 1998 El Nino, just like everyone else.
I seem to remember seeing somewhere an archival thing showing
GISSTEMP with a high 1998 El Nino, just like everyone else.
So I created synthetic series using an ARIMA (3,1,0) model
with the initial values constrained to match the first three values of
GISStemp and the coefficients and standard deviation of the noise term derived from a an ARIMA (3,1,0) model
with no drift term fit to the 1880 - 2009
GISStemp data.
This suggests to me that cointegrating the
GISStemp global means for July
with TSI and the atmospheric CO2 level (which is the same at Barrow & Hilo) may be missing something.