2012 «Light Darkness and Shadow: Art and the Meaning of Life», Huffpost Culture, 11 December «Review: Tim
Noble & Sue Webster Nihilistic Optimistic, Blain Southern», Kentish Towner, 6 November Mark Sinclair, «Nihilism, optimism and bedtime tales», Creative Review, 1 November Martin Coomer, «Tim
Noble and Sue Webster: Nihilistic Optimistic», TimeOut: London, 29 October «Where to buy... Tim
Noble and Sue Webster», The Week, 27 October Amy Dawson, «Art Review», The Metro, 24 October Rachel Campbell - Johnston, «Exhibitions: Critic» s Choice», The Times, 20 October Lia Chavez, «A Glimpse at Splitting, Multiplying Universes: Frieze London 2012 Highlights», Huffpost Arts & Culture, 17 October «Arts Agenda: The cultural highlights you have to see», I Newspaper, 16 October «Tim
Noble and Sue Webster exhibition: We and Our Shadows», Evening Standard, 16 October Rob Alderson, «Amazing Silhouette Sculptures by Tim
Noble and Sue Webster on show in London», It» s Nice That, 16 October Waldemar Januszczak, «Magic Lurks in the Shadows», The Sunday Times, 14 October Emma O'Kelly, «Nihilistic Optimistic by Tim
Noble and Sue Webster, Blain Southern Gallery», Wallpaper, 10 October Colin Gleadell, «The best anti-Frieze in London», The Daily Telegraph, 9 October Jon
Savage, «Frieze Week: Tim
Noble & Sue Webster», Dazed Digital, 8 October Kate Kellaway, «Interview
with Tim
Noble & Sue Webster», The Observer, 7 October Rachel Campbell - Johnston, «Critics Choice», The Times, 6 October Lynn Barber, «The Dark Arts», The Sunday Times, 30 September Charlotte Cripps, «Bringing art to the Charts», The Independent, 29 September «Modern Life is Rubbish», The Art Newspaper, October John B. Henderson, «Chess», The Scotsman, 18 September Tim Walker, «Observations: Chess is the name of the game in a new London show», The Independent, 4 September Liz Stinson, «Artists Turn Junk Into Amazing Silhouettes», Wired, 6 July «Tim and Sue», Hunger, Summer «Tim
Noble, Sue Webster and David Adjaye in Coversation
with Louisa Buck», Garage Mag Online, 25 May
He argues convincingly that their numbers were far higher than previously thought; that, contrary to the Rousseauian picture of the isolated «
noble savage» roaming the virgin forests
with bow and arrow, the Indians practiced a great deal of intensive land and forest management, both in the temperate forests of North America, and in the tropical ones of Central America and Amazonia; and that, the genetic homogeneity of the Indians made them almost universally vulnerable to European diseases, particularly those that originated
with the livestock that the Europeans brought
with them (and to which the Europeans had relative immunity).