But the new variation on this theme deals with droplets of quark stuff intermingling
with nuclear matter.
Not exact matches
The Wall Street Journal in August spoke
with a South Korean trader who provided perhaps the best insight into why: «If war breaks out
with North Korea and they fire a
nuclear weapon, it becomes a
matter of life or death, and at that point, what happens in the stock market is meaningless.»
The laws of physic requires that there be forces and objects that interact
with each other, such as the four forces now known, of gravity, electro - magnetism, the strong and weak
nuclear forces (and now there is possibly dark energy) that is interwoven within
matter.
Some believe that
with nuclear fusion unlimited sources of energy will be ours and that we can chemically alter the earth's
matter so as to replace exhausted resources
with others.
«From the fact that quantum theory agrees
with experiment in so wide a domain..., it is evident that the indeterministic features of quantum mechanics are in some way a reflection of the real behaviour of
matter in the atomic and
nuclear domains, but here the question arises as to just how to interpret this indeterminism» (p. 86).
«Such a possibility of a
nuclear exchange
with Russia, starting by accident, no
matter how remote it might be at present, would have such a catastrophic result that we should be working hard now to ensure that it can never happen.
Trident involves a
nuclear priesthood
with an archaic language and doctrine stuck in a past conflict that
matters little to most of the electorate, protected from the ravages of austerity by a political class out of touch.
He says the NRC is considering how the baffle bolt issue could be impacting other
nuclear plants and has been in discussion
with plant owners on the
matter.
I have to be honest, it seems like a damn free - for - all
with zero checks and balances, and it's just a
matter of time until the president unilaterally plunges the world into
nuclear war.
Whether or not one would resort to the
nuclear option which my honourable friend suggests I think is a
matter for the FA - but one we will need to discuss
with them.»
Neutrinos, electrically neutral particles that sense only gravity and the weak
nuclear force, interact so feebly
with matter that 100 trillion zip unimpeded through your body every second.
It can unite the strong and weak
nuclear forces
with the electromagnetic force and offers a candidate for dark
matter.
«The US industry is proposing to purchase lots of commercial - grade emergency equipment and distribute it in many different places,
with the hope that there will be something left no
matter what happens,» says Edwin Lyman, a
nuclear industry analyst
with the Union of Concerned Scientists in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Particle physics and
nuclear physics concern themselves
with the study of these particles, their interactions, and
matter made up of them which do not aggregate into atoms.
Jeremy Webb's recent article (This Week, 14 January) prompted me to raise the
matter with John Major, who I know shares my concern about East European
nuclear reactors.
In addition to producing gravity, WIMPs would interact
with other
matter and themselves only through the weak
nuclear force.
The U.S. agreement
with Korea that governs
nuclear materials including spent fuel, for example, stipulates that the United States will «consult
with the Government of the Republic of Korea in the
matter of health and safety.»
A recent analysis of the only known natural
nuclear reactor, which was active nearly 2 billion years ago at what is now Oklo in Gabon, also suggests something about light's interaction
with matter has changed.
Currently, the hypothetical Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, which are believed to interact
with normal
matter through gravity and the weak
nuclear force, are the leading candidates to explain the composition of dark
matter, but what class of particles these WIMPs belong to is not yet known.
In 2011, Dragan Hajdukovic at the European Organization for
Nuclear Research (CERN) proposed that empty space is filled
with particles of
matter and antimatter that are not only electrical opposites, but also gravitational opposites.
Derenzo and his colleague wrote that despite overwhelming evidence for dark
matter, recent large - scale experiments designed to detect
nuclear recoils from dark
matter particles
with masses of WIMPs have not yet seen a definitive signal.
Aug. 29, 2017 - Conducting an experiment that combines high explosives
with plutonium — a special
nuclear material used in
nuclear weapons — is no trivial
matter.
While Aloha is (over) cluttered
with a dense tapestry of plots ranging from
nuclear arms in outer space to mythical Hawaiian legends, there's always the pervading feeling that none of it really
matters because everything will turn out okay in the end.
Having already explored the ocean from a factual perspective (the Oscar - winning 1953 documentary The Sea Around Us), writer - director - producer Irwin Allen opted to take the fantasy route
with this entertaining yarn in which a
nuclear submarine might be the only hope against a circling fire belt that threatens to destroy Earth in a
matter of days.
But if its aesthetic deals
with subject
matter that is «tragic and timeless,» that subject
matter was unique to its times — the holocaust, threat of
nuclear annihilation, the subsequent search for meaning.
I7:» wouldn't there be fossil evidence no
matter how squashed in sedimentary rocks:
nuclear waste hazards, landfill linings, velociraptors
with titanium hip replacements, that sort of thing?»
Are there real practical problems
with it, or is it a
matter that the massive R&D costs any
nuclear approach needs are unlikely to be footed if there isn't a military application?
With wind forecasting, changes in wind energy output are factored into grid operations much like variations in demand — both change over a
matter of 30 minutes or even hours (not a
matter of seconds, such as when fossil - fuelled or
nuclear plants experience an unexpected outage, or a tree falls on a transmission line).
But this impulse puts them at odds
with the views of the scientific community on the
matter (scientists tend to think
nuclear power risks are overblown, especially in light of the dangers of other energy sources, like coal).
No
matter what assumptions we enter, it is clear that we are far better off to get
nuclear at least cost — as long as it will give us better total health effects than we have now., which clearly replacement of fossil fuels
with nuclear will do.
I believe it will not
matter how many of the Green activists you can convince, if we can not offer
nuclear at a cost competitive
with coal, it will not get supported by the majority of electors.
Missiles replaced by turbines: Replacing the powerful arms industry
with the powerful «renewables» industry — of course in both case it doesn't
matter that the costly
nuclear weapons were never used, likewise it doesn't
matter that wind power is useless.
Climate change — and, forthat
matter, the enormous present - day health risks associated
with burning coal, oil, and gas — simply dwarf any legitimate risk associated
with the operation of
nuclear power plants.
Many of these obstacles have nothing to do
with the fear - mongering of the anti-
nuclear movement or, for that
matter, the regulatory hurdles imposed by the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission and similar agencies around the world.
With regards India,
nuclear power (or any baseload for that
matter) for the majority of Indians (mostly rural) is a cruel joke.
However, it is perfectly obvious I have little to lean here as the discussion starts
with an assumption that
nuclear is evil, and the objective is to fire off as many debating points as possible, no
matter how ill thought out and unsubstantiated.
From Sweden and France to New Jersey and Illinois,
nuclear plants can be kept on - line, but they must be constantly fought for against those who have, for four decades, sought to replace them
with fossil fuels and renewables — no
matter the economic or environmental cost.
It might help you if you had a few concepds in mind too when considering this subject, like «space» is the big energy «sink»
with old sol (and the internal heat generating processes (including
nuclear) of the earth) as sources... any mechanism that results in a delay of energy leaving earth, such as a «bounce - back» or a re-rad of energy (like back radiation) certainly is going to increase the «energy flux» in the system, and this in any way you want to frame the argument translates to a «higher» energy state, and a higher so - called temperature» (movement in
matter, velocity of air molecules or oscillations in certain «resonant molecules) as well.
With that,
nuclear may start to outcompete coal + sequestration, or for that
matter maybe all the renewables we all love would become the winners.
This
matters because the climate change debate has been hi - jacked, emissions made worse by the net effects of renewables for a fast lobbyist buck in fact, driven by ignorance and misleading attacks that lump clean low carbon gas
with dirty high carbon coal, and old school anti-
nuclear activists who oppose
nuclear generation on factualy spurious grounds, while it is in physics and engineering fact by far the best solution on any measure, through promoting irrational fear unsupported in any area of the facts and proven physics they deceive the unknowing about
with simply false or msleading «sience».
We also work closely
with our OSHA team to assist our
nuclear power sector clients in a wide variety of workplace safety and health issues, including handling agency investigations and enforcement actions and internal investigations, as well as compliance
matters including issues involving safety culture and safety management.
I'm a Mechanical Turbine Field Engineer
with 34 years experience Subject
Matter Expert, Project Manager and Lead Mechanical Engineer for
Nuclear and Fossil Power utilities and energy providers.
International Trade Compliance to address the special challenges associated
with control of C4ISR, WMD,
nuclear, IT, space and other sensitive technologies; industry, government, national laboratory, professional trade association, and university
matters related to export control of products, technology and services (both military and dual use), including associated technical data and technical assistance; and render traini...