Sentences with phrase «with real claimed»

The Spanish international's transfer has been speculated in the press for the past few months, with Real claimed to be ready to trigger his release clause this summer, before selling him on for a sizeable profit.

Not exact matches

As 1 World Trade Center starts to claim a place on the Lower Manhattan skyline, the area's retail scene is beginning to revive, with landlords raising rents in anticipation of thousands of new office workers, tourists and residents, commercial real estate experts said.

Using real - life anecdotes from busy professionals (check out the complete post for lots of interesting personal stories) who claim to «have it all,» Vanderkam asserts that with thoughtful use of checklists or intensive scheduling (one interviewee dutifully adds sleep and «unexpected pursuits» to his calendar), you really can shoehorn all your priorities into your allotted hours.

The Sun claims they met with American billionaire Stephen Ross, a real estate mogul and the principal owner of NFL side the Miami Dolphins.

Earlier this month, the Toronto Real Estate Board (TREB) claimed a worthless victory in its three - year battle with the Competition Bureau.

Next up, anyone involved in marketing content for environmentally healthy and bio-degradable products must be able to back up any claims they make with real proof.

Ulbricht may have been able to obtain a lighter sentence had he pled guilty, but he instead went with a far - fetched defense strategy at trial that claimed that he had started the site, but that someone else was the real Dread Pirate Roberts.

Opinion: As Alberta grapples with deficits, some claim the solution is higher taxes, but that misses the real problem: years of out of control spending

The lawsuit claims that rather than competing with one another to offer a lower, «real» price to the insurers, the drug makers are vying to offer the best payment to the pharmacy benefit manager, which is why they have been raising the list price.

In November, the FBI charged Brooklyn businessman Maksim Zaslavskiy with securities fraud and conspiracy to commit securities fraud for allegedly bilking investors out of $ 300,000 through an ICO scam called REcoin which he claimed was «the first - ever cryptocurrency backed by real estate.»

Often, the seats that you can claim with the fewest number of miles are hard to come by and have the lowest real value.

With > 200 CEO applications per day and most approved Memberships taking between 1 - 10 days to be claimed, there is no accurate way to associate the generic UIN with a real human beWith > 200 CEO applications per day and most approved Memberships taking between 1 - 10 days to be claimed, there is no accurate way to associate the generic UIN with a real human bewith a real human being.

I work in real estate investment (invest on behalf of family offices and high net worth investors), and it recently occurred to me that while you invest in P2P lending, you haven't invested with real estate crowdfunding sites which claim to yield better returns than the ~ 7 % you've achieved via P2P.

Trump's comments about the relationship broke an 11 - day silence since Daniels went public with claims of an extramarital affair with the real estate mogul in a 60 Minutes interview.

In answering questions from reporters on Air Force One Thursday, Trump broke 11 days of silence from the president since Daniels went public with claims of an extramarital affair with the real estate mogul in a 60 Minutes interview.

Daniels, an adult film star whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, claims to have had a year - long affair with Donald Trump beginning shortly after his wife, Melania, gave birth to their son Barron in 2006.

Accordingly, a year - over-year increase in new claims of about 20 % (which would currently equate to a level of about 340,000 weekly new claims) would create a significant concern of a new recession in progress, particularly if coupled with other evidence such as equity market weakness and slowing growth in real personal income.

Along with the Panama Papers in 2015 and the Offshore Leaks in 2013, this leak — which Appleby claims was a hack — brings the world of real estate and finance into a new age of transparency.

It is strange that the scammers spend so much money to shoot high production videos with real actors only to make ludicrous claims of a million in a month.

The irony being that he was threatened by the church for going against the whole «god did it» argument, which is what this guy was trying to claim, and has nothing to do with «real science»

These beliefs are apparently the ones set forth by Messrs. Johnson, Hoge, and Luidens in «Mainline Churches: The Real Reason for Decline» (FT, March 1993): (1) That Christianity is the only religion with a valid claim to truth, (2) that persons can be saved only through Jesus Christ and otherwise go to hell, and (3) that therefore one should try to convert others to the Christian faith.

When you can come up with an explanation of where the Y - chromosomes came from that made Jesus a REAL MAN as you CLAIM, then you will BEGIN to have credibility.

Stop confusing REAL faith with a claim to knowledge.

:... still we have a ton of physical evidence that God is real...» One point of view: Most, if not all, Atheists would disagree with this statement and ask for solid scientific evidence to support such a claim.

1 The first two alternatives alluded to in Ford's title are (1) John Cobb's theory of epochal becoming to the exclusion of real genetic successiveness (with which the present paper is in general sympathy), and (2) Edward Pols's claim that Whitehead's theory of genetic successiveness is inconsistent with the theory of epochal becoming.

As I claim, sin is a catholic invention and exists solely with in that organisation, it has no meaning out side in the real world.

It's concession by rewriting history, claiming no conflict with science by denying that the exposed belief was never literal / relevant / real.

If you believe everything anyone claims he has experienced in his mind is real you are out tough with reality.

There's but one thing moral knowledge is not, at least according to reigning opinion: it is not real knowledge, knowable with certainty, which imposes a claim precisely because it is knowable.

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

Lindbeck is often accused of being an anti-realist or constructivist, the idea that truth claims humans make are simply ones that we make up and «construct» ourselves with no real relationship with the way things really are.

In modern secular Britain - indeed, in the modern secular West - any claim that there is anything like a real and absolute Truth is viewed with suspicion at the very least and most of the time with a sustained antagonism.

Only the church that can forgo its desire to sing Alleluia and claim victory, that dares to join its voice with those who know only dirges, can hope to be a part of a real victory party.

To say there is no evidence for the real existence of the most discussed figure in history denies the unique manner in which Christianity came about (a claim that God came in the flesh conveyed with real life details, etc).

I don't think the metaphysical Jesus that Paul claims to have encountered (in a vision) was real, or that he was the same Jesus known as Yeshua the Nazorean, and I don't think that there is any validity to the theology that Christians believe about Jesus, because those beliefs start with Paul and smack of the Gentile theology of that era.

Conversely, the panpsychist or nonmaterialist must claim either that both the mental images with their spatiotemporal pattern and the brain with its different and incompatible spatiotemporal pattern are real, or that the images are real and the brain itself only an appearance.

I started out saying that if someone claims to be having a real relationship with a god in their head with real conversations then they are delusional about that issue (not in general, but about that phenomena).

The problems and issues are real, but let's not fan the flames (from either side) with rhetoric, and especially with unsubstantiated claims.

And if this is not the case, are there not other religious traditions, each with its own historical concept of the ultimately real, and their claims to truth?

If he wants to celebrates reason, we can start with some real proof to his claim.

No less a mathematical authority than Alonzo Church, in his review of the second edition of volumes II and III, claims that in the whole of volume I (over 700 pages of closely argued mathematical logic introductory to the theory of cardinal numbers) and together with volumes II and III (themselves enormous tomes) one gets «cardinal numbers, relations and relation - numbers, series, well ordered series and ordinal numbers, and finally the continuum of real numbers» (BAMS34: 237).

Granted that no parents can claim full and true knowledge of what is for the benefit of the child, the obligation still rests with them to govern their action with respect to him in the light of their best understanding of his real needs.

With regard to hell, or heaven for that matter, I wonder why Christians have no problem claiming the existence of such places even though they can offer no evidence that these places are real?

If you want to believe it, awesome, believe it with all your heart but coming on message boards and claiming your religion is more «real» or is fact because the magic book at the center of it says it is borders on the retarded.

Real Christians Hate Religion... Real Christians Hate Hypocrites... Real Christians should be more like Christ... How could you claim to be a Christian if you don't even know your Christ... The reason why doomed people would never understand Christ is because they never tried to search for the Truth... They only listen to such rubbish things rather than the Truth... Read and do more and Talk less... It doesn't take a genius to know that Someone created you rather than you coming to life with just atoms randomly hitting each other... If you're really smart, think about it... Stop the non-sense talk about God and Science and find it out for yourself...

Therefor, for the purpose of this discussion, you should not be surprised if I claim to know right along with you — so, to reiterate — I know that you don't know that your God is real.

My humble advise to you is to go and study the history that how, when and who wrote these chapters and what type of time it went through and then say that if there is any statement in this book is the real time statements of Jesus PBUH... please be honest with yourself... and don't do anything to please others but only you... and make sure you are convince with this study... whats the difference btwn what is in this book and what was written in a book last year when a Hindu claim himself as God and millions believed in him and still they believe even after his death by being ill... no one asks if I take a human as my God then how could he be ill or eventually be dead?

You make a lot of claims but won't back them up with real evidence.

Indeed, this concept provides Hinduism with an absorptive quality which enables it to accept any religion from any source as simply a phase of the ultimately real Brahman — so long as it does not make exclusive claims for its deity as do Christianity and Islam.

Not only have such men long since become convinced of the essential incoherence of this theism in its efforts to combine the religious insights of Christianity with the philosophical wisdom of the Greeks, but they are also deeply repelled by the central claim of Greek wisdom, that this world of time and change is somehow inferior or not fully real.