Sentences with phrase «with summary conviction»

The lawyer that SLS had in place to argue for the status of SLS status in Court was never needed, the judge was convinced that SLS members were authorized to appear in Court by the express provision in the Criminal Code allowing agents to appear for individuals charged with Summary Conviction offences.

Not exact matches

We do not miss the loyalty of David's mercenary troops (15: 19 - 21); the narrator's conviction of the mature quality of David's faith (15:25 f.; 16:12); the essential gentleness of David in these most wretched hours (16:5 - 14); the brilliant, carnal symbol of Absalom's irrevocable usurpation (16:20 - 22) and its portentous recall of the David - Nathan encounter (II 12:11 - 12); the arch Old Testament realist, the remarkable pragmatist Ahitophel (17: 1 - 23); Joab, who always acts like Joab (18:10 - 15; 19:1 - 7; 20A - 13); David's pathetic concern, implicit throughout, for the defiant son (18:1 - 5); the moving grief of a father's utter brokenness in the loss of his son (18:33); the reassertion in this critical time of the old and always fundamental north - south cleavage (19:11,41 - 43); David's profound and probably chronic annoyance with the crude, brash, «muscular» ways of Joab and his brothers, the sons of Zeruiah (16:10; 19:22; see also 3:34 b; 3:38 f.); and finally, in a kind of pausal summary before the last scene of David's reign in I Kings 1 - 2, the statement of David's very modest bureaucracy (20:23 - 26; cf. the extensive elaboration of this structure under Solomon, I Kings 4:1 ff.).

The summary trial, conviction and sentencing were anything but a fair hearing / trial and last but not the least, the taking away of their liberty was not in accordance with procedure permitted by law as required under Article 14 (1).

The question again is, were the SC's summary trial, conviction and sentencing of the contemnors «in accordance with procedure permitted by law» prior to the SC interfering with the liberty of the contemnors?

The C.A. dismissed the appeal, agreeing with both the trial judge and summary conviction appeal judge that «officer» included elected

(1) No person shall --(a) take or attempt to take in any court any photograph, or with a view to publication make or attempt to make in any court any portrait or sketch, of any person, being a judge of the court or a juror or a witness in or a party to any proceedings before the court, whether civil or criminal; or (b) publish any photograph, portrait or sketch taken or made in contravention of the foregoing provisions of this section or any reproduction thereof; and if any person acts in contravention of this section he shall, on summary conviction, be liable in respect of each offence to a fine not exceeding fifty pounds.

Permitting a joint trial of provincial charges and summary conviction criminal charges is consistent with the intent of both the Provincial Offences Act and the Criminal Code, Justice Michael Moldaver wrote, with Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin and justices Rosalie Abella, Andromache Karakatsanis, Richard Wagner, Clément Gascon and Malcolm Rowe concurring.

It will be at the discretion of the Crown as to whether they would prefer to proceed with the charge on indictment or on summary conviction.

The duty counsel provided at Summary Conviction Drug Court is in collaboration with the Provincial Court of Manitoba.

Summary conviction appeals are usually less costly than indictable appeals because, among other things, there is only one rather than three or five judges who must be provided with complete copies of all transcripts.

There is no deadline for updating the private register of charges, however failure to comply with the obligation set out in section 162 of the Act is an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a fine of US$ 5,000.

A variance between the information and the evidence is not material with respect to the time when a summary conviction offence was committed if it is proved that the information was laid within the six month period of limitation.

A breach is punishable as an indictable offence with a maximum penalty of up to 2 years» imprisonment, or on summary conviction.

Having maintained an appellate as well as trial practice throughout his career, Mr. Clark has secured release for many appellants through the years, combining the general practices of preparing Sureties and crafting Release Plans with the somewhat more specialized understanding of appellate law and procedures applicable at both the Superior Court of Justice (Summary Conviction appeals) and the Court of Appeal for Ontario (Indictable appeals).

The Court of Appeal found there was ``... an arguable issue of substance in this case of sufficient importance to merit the attention of the full court...» since the Summary Conviction Appeal judge ``... did not conduct a meaningful analysis...» with respect to s. 489 (2), and the police «need to know» the scope of their powers in circumstances where firearms are involved and they are ``... lawfully in a residence with children present...» (See para. 11).

Indictable offences and the penalties that come with them are generally far more serious than summary conviction offences.

727... Where hearing ex parte (3) Where a summary conviction court holds a trial pursuant to subsection 803 (2) and convicts the offender, the court may, whether or not the offender was notified that a greater punishment would be sought by reason of a previous conviction, make inquiries and hear evidence with respect to previous convictions of the offender and, if any such conviction is proved, may impose a greater punishment by reason thereof.

The C.A. dismissed the appeal, agreeing with both the trial judge and summary conviction appeal judge that «officer» included elected (more...)

Again, and you did touch on it, for those individuals who find themselves convicted of a crime in this country, there is the fine option program available in seven of the provinces, which allows people to find other ways of contributing and dealing with their inability to pay the fine or the surcharge of the fine or the surcharge on their criminal conviction for a summary or indictable offence.

Complaints that fall short of misconduct may be dealt with pastorally, while certain categories of cases such as criminal convictions will be dealt with under a faster, summary process.

(1) Every one who wilfully does an indecent act, (a) In a public place in the presence of one or more persons, or (b) In any place, with intent thereby to insult or offend any person, is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.