Sentences with phrase «with teaching matters»

Reshma Ramkellawan has been an educational consultant with Teaching Matters for the past three years.

We look forward to partnering again with Teaching Matters to bring a meaningful opportunity to our teacher leaders and provide another support for developing their instructional skills aligned with the Common Core,» says Amy Way, Executive Director of Teacher Recruitment and Quality, NYC DOE.

This systematic approach is driven by the guidance Teaching Matters coaches provide to teacher leaders, who in turn, and with Teaching Matters continuing support, build teachers» capacity to effectively teach reading.

Her work has been used for Hunter College's Urban Teacher Residency initiative, New York City's collaboration with Teaching Matters, the United Federation of Teacher's Teacher Center, City College of New York, and many public schools throughout New York City.

Not exact matches

No matter which grade you teach, you are in the position of interacting with large groups of people constantly.

No matter your teaching style, any effective teacher will prioritize emotional development along with intellectual.

My company, Poshly, prides itself on hiring subject - matter experts across various competency areas so employees can come together to teach and share with one another.

Complicating matters further is Osteen's association with the prosperity gospel movement, and the related «Word of Faith» movement popular in some evangelical circles, which teaches that believing Christians can harness the power of prayerful speech: to reap material and financial rewards in this life as well as the next.

It simply teaches it's ok to play with fire, you won't get burnt, but if you do get burnt, we will make it look like it never happened, no matter how horrible the consequence.

Now as a Christian I follow the new testament, and so striving to be Christ like as a Christian I accept everyone for who they are, I love them and do not presume to know the right way for them to live their life, instead I simply open my arms to others and know that all people of all faiths are just fine it doesn't matter to me what you do with your life all that matters is the way that you do it... that was my understanding of christs teachings anyways

The college of bishops in union with the Bishop of Rome, and bishops individually, are thought to have a special charism for teaching on matters of «faith and morals.»

Regrettably, few preachers have addressed the matter from the pulpit — partly because most aren't really sure what the Christian position is and partly because their understanding of the Bible and the teachings of the church does not square with either their experience or their reason.

And yet, though I am not acquainted with him, I know at least this much: No matter how saintly he is, no matter how profound his Christian witness, no matter how gifted his teaching, Timothy George will not be sharing in the Lord's Supper with Richard John Neuhaus.

As with matters related to hell, if you do not see something explicitly or implicitly taught in Scripture, ignore what is not there.

I use a similar model in preaching and teaching, but always try to be consistent with the message I am sharing, no matter who I am sharing it with or what issues they are facing.

Now, here's where I suspect Challies and I may agree: Because we believe Scripture to be authoritative in matters of faith and practice and a trustworthy testimony regarding Jesus Christ, we would be right to be highly suspicious of anyone whose claims about their experiences with God run contrary to the teachings of Scripture.

Black Lives Matter is preaching life, hope and justice, and if we want to learn how to preach a fuller Gospel, then we have to participate with people who are teaching parts of the truth.

When we add to this the understanding oft the teaching of Jesus reached in connection with Luke 11.20, we may claim that the meaning is: «the Kingdom is a matter of human experience.»

Thus Vatican II stated: «In matters of faith and morals, the bishops speak in the name of Christ and the faithful are to accept their teaching and adhere to it with a religious assent of soul.»

Most obvious is that teaching at all levels and with all subject matter came to be done in «schools,» institutions with their own type of organization even when in or related to churches.

NCSCM's experience reveals that seminary professors are often profoundly shaken by what they learn of ministry from interacting with our students, while many of our adjunct faculty, both clergy and lay, display superior teaching skills and understanding of their subject matter and contemporary ministry.

Therefore, a referendum on same - sex marriage presented the perfect opportunity to show the Catholic Church as a teaching institution just how thoroughly its teaching in sexual matters has been rejected, at least insofar as it was ever really known to begin with.

13 These things we also speak, not with words taught by human wisdom, but with those taught by [the] spirit, as we combine spiritual [matters] with spiritual [words].

No, what American Catholics are happy about, or should be, is that the pope is bringing Christianity into the dialogue with secularism in a way that doesn't alienate the people he would like to introduce to Christ via grace and mercy AND that he is doing so while maintaining the firm teachings the Church holds on moral matters.

These are matters of divine revelation, however, and as the Church has long believed and taught, revelation ended with the death of the last apostle.

However, my interest lies in the actual and effective emergence of a new structure of existence, and as a matter of historical fact, this occurred only by the total impact of Jesus» transformation of Jewish teaching combined with his resurrection appearances.

Whenever we come upon these matters in secular writers, let that admirable light of truth shining in them teach us that the mind of man, though fallen and perverted from its wholeness, is nevertheless clothed and ornamented with God's excellent gifts.18

In a statement, it outlined its issue with Bishop Alan: «The continued failure to admonish the Bishop of Buckingham, despite his refusal to uphold the teaching of the Church and guidance of the House on matters of sexuality, whilst also allowing him, without criticism, repeatedly to describe Conservative Evangelicals as homophobic, including those who themselves experience same - sex attraction but seek to live celibate, God - honouring lives.»

Would they say you teach them more about what it means to live with purpose and love well, or would they say you get easily caught up in petty and unimportant matters?

Who else the committee consulted is not a matter of public record, but reliable sources report that the process involved a number of parties closely associated with homosexual advocacy and critical of the Church's teaching.

They were taught to expect that this universe of space and time came into existence in one complex, unifying burst of intelligence, the logos in whom, by whom, and with whom all things were made, and that makes all things (no matter how humble) intelligible.

Where the Council was not teaching on matters of faith and morals, such as where it was describing contemporary conditions or offering recommendations for renewal, its statements are to be received with respect and gratitude but are not necessarily flawless in either their factual accuracy or their prudential judgment.

It is de fide Catholic teaching that we shall rise with the «same bodies» we now have, and most theologians have understood this to mean that our resurrected bodies will be composed of the «same matter» as composes our present bodies.

I asked her whether the psychology professors were aligned with Orthodox teachings on free will, sexuality, and other controversial matters.

So we are left with «unequivocal» Church teaching, explicitly based on texts which ought not to be cited since they are «unhelpful» and suggestive of «fundamentalism» (whatever that means), and with no real elaboration of why the Church teaches what it does on this important matter.

1) The people, including Father Greeley, who incessantly lament the gap between teaching and the reception of teaching are typically the same people who have for years worked to undermine the credibility of the Church's teaching office; 2) Their measure of whether the Church is listening is whether teaching is brought into line with their preferences; 3) The curia in Rome coordinates and corrects as necessary, but the teachers of the Church are the bishops, priests and catechists who too often find it easier to blame Rome than to do their job; 4) Catholic Americans are about 6 percent of the universal Church, and Greeley's think - for - themselves educated Catholics who are unhappy with church teaching, usually on matters sexual, are a much smaller part of that 6 percent.

Because our culture has for so long insidiously taught citizens that the good life is measured by their economic success and participation in the consumer society, it is small wonder so many believe that politics is a burden that conflicts with their pursuit of what really matters.

In connection with the question of the evolutionary origins of man, the Church's teaching emphasizes that spirit and matter are not the same, that spirit can not be derived from matter, and that man, because spiritual, has a metaphysically irreducible position in the cosmos, so that his origin, as far as his spiritual nature is concerned, can not be found in matter.

To say with such conviction that no Democrat will enter Heaven... based on YOUR interpretation of what God's holy nature is... based on a Book (no matter how much instruction and wisdom it may provide... without, it seems to me, using your own intellect to delve deeper into the whole of it... is in my opinion the sign of a Believer with a Giant Sequoia in his eye and teaching with his finger.

But the Christian scientist as such in his own sphere is bound as a matter of principle and method by the Church's magisterium as the higher and more comprehensive authority, in the sense that even as a scientist he may not affirm as established with certainty by his science something which would involve a definite contradiction of a doctrine taught officially by the Church as certain (Denzinger 1656, 1674 ff., 1681, 2085).

Intending no disrespect to the great Jesuit theologian himself, the way Trinitarian theology has been taught, with admittedly a few honourable exceptions, has left many of us unaware of the preceding 2,000 years of reflection on the matter.

Philosophical religion, however, was another matter entirely, for many things the philosophers taught were compatible with Christian theology.

The fundamental problem in connection with knowledge of the teaching of Jesus is the problem of reconstructing that teaching from the sources available to us, and the truth of the matter is that the more we learn about those sources the more difficult our task seems to become.

Recall now the evidence, illustrated previously by Niebuhr's discussion of the current theological concern with the resurrection narrative in the New Testament: that teaching and preaching have not done with this matter.

Education is what mattered most in the West, with the schools teaching the classical curriculum, including Greek and Latin.

He formulates it as follows: «By a process of elimination we are left with twenty - one sayings whose attestation and subject matter do not give rise to objections of weight, which are perfectly compatible with the genuine teachings of our Lord, and which have as high a claim to authenticity as the sayings recorded in our four gospels.

To give an example from a matter that will concern us later, the eschatology of Jesus demands that we wrestle with the problem of the meaning of the element of futurity in the hope of first - century Judaism, and at the same time that we do justice to the new element in the teaching of Jesus in this regard.

And can we believe that Jesus made the kingdom the central note in his message, taught his followers to pray «thy kingdom come,» with many poignant parables of the kingdom, and then had all this apocalyptic matter only grafted onto it?

The Encyclical Ut unum sint lists among the five still controversial areas: «I) the relationship between Sacred Scripture, as the highest authority in matter of faith, and Sacred Tradition, as indispensable to the interpretation of the Word of God,» and «4) the Magisterium of the Church, entrusted to the Pope and the Bishops in communion with him, understood as a responsibility and an authority exercised in the name of Christ for teaching and safeguarding the faith.»

If we find ourselves disagreeing as Catholics with the teaching of the Church on a serious matter, it's probably not the Church that's wrong.