The Gop / TP party insist on mixing politics and government
with religion which should not be happening.
This is in conflict
with a religion which was already set in place, Islam.
Do you have a problem
with a religion which has taught to respect everything in world.
Not exact matches
Social groups like Kiwanis are shrinking,
which goes hand in hand
with the overall decline in advanced countries of
religion.
«Believing
with you that
religion is a matter
which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate
with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people
which declared that their legislature should «make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,» thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.»
These codes,
which also include The Code of Hammurabi and the Code of Ur Nammu, were royal edicts that dealt
with everything from
religion to rilitary service to rrade and slavery.
Letter to Doctor Benjamin Rush from Thomas Jefferson Washington, April 21, 1803 Dear Sir, — In some of the delightful conversations
with you, in the evenings of 1798 - 99, and
which served as an anodyne to the afflictions of of the crisis through
which our country was then laboring, the Crhistain
religion was sometimes our topic; and I the promised you, that one day or other, I would give you my views of it.
I find it amazing that almost every organized
religion during that time was at least partially, if not fully involved in bigotry toward blacks, including outright banning them from their membership and congretations altogether (
which Mormans have never done), but only Mormons are still chided constantly about their history
with blacks, despite the fact that black members have had full benefits for almost four decades, and despite the fact that Mormons have been actively proselyting and doing charitable missionary work in Africa for over 160 years.
Science is not influenced by belief as you suggest because many scientists
with different beliefs validate the experiments, unlike
religion which is pure belief
with no evidence.
Obviously here is the problem
with this nonsensical illogic that is Christianity,
which a perverted form of a Jewish heresy tainted by Greco Roman
religion and culture.
Without intending any any disrespect to your contention, I wonder how the use of a school building by a religious group at a time or day when students and teachers are not using it is likely to result in a situation in
which the «religious group becomes identified
with the school,
which appears to be promoting that brand of
religion».
Additionally more and more I see pastors mixing
religion with politics
which is something I am not seeking.
But until we come to the end of ourselves then we are going to do and say what we want, even as it was
with me: It's one thing to be a heathen, even as I was, but a whole other ball game to set our hearts on God and His truth; yet, that can only come when we are sick and tired of being sick and tired of our own lives and we just give up, we know then who has given up by the one they advocate for, even has given place to: Paul said;
with my heart I want to do what is right, but my flesh does what I hate: This is when God's grace is sufficient, because our hearts are right
with God, but our flesh is not: There is a war going on within these temples, therefore; even as our flesh wins out to do what we hate, our hearts are set on God and His ways
which has been established in the Word of Truth,
which then causes us to stand and speak forth what we believe, even as this causes a rending to happen within us, for Christ to be formed in us this needs to be, as we come up in His glories even for a better resurrection for them who believe: The heart wars against our flesh, even as Christ wars against the man of sin within: For out of the abundance of our hearts our mouth doth speak, therefore; if we speak not the Wholesome Words of our Lord, Then our hearts are still wicked: But to advocate for wickedness instead of Christ, one has become a teacher of lawlessness, he then advocates for the man of sin: Many who have come out of
religion has done this, as they went from one mountain top «from the extreme right» of self exaltation (
Religion) to the other mountain top «to the extreme left» of the (Heathen) and missed the valley in - between that is takes to humble us: One extreme to the other, and missed Jesus: Jesus is taking ones through the valley's to strip us down of all who we are before exalting us to be just as He, even as the Christ in us overcomes that man of sin (Adam) through theses valleys of contrast that cause a rending to happen within; and when we are rent in two, we stand on His word of truth, so we too can become one
with Him, even as Jesus is
with our Father: This is how Christ is formed in us: Thank - you Father; in Jesus Name Alexandria
In an attempt to calm the passions of «Black Tuesday,» as the riot came to be known, the government last July replaced the makeshift grave
with a marble sarcophagus, even as it declared that it would uphold the new constitution»
which guarantees the equality of all
religions before the law.
This is about illegal use of public resources and also about the illegal * appearance * of mixing
religion with public schooling
which is also prohibited.
But if this is used to invalidate all claims to discern the truth, it is in fact an arrogant claim
with the kind of knowledge
which is superior that you have just said, no
religion has.»
Theistic satanism usually takes either of two faces: Luceferianism
which worships Lucifer (or the bringer of light)
which is actually a very nice set of beliefs (google it) much in - line
with other popular
religions..
A government
which systematically and publicly seeks to buttress its political legitimacy from Christian Bibles, oaths, clergy, and prayer, in continuum
with more than a millennium of political leaders within Christendom, is not acting «neutrally» among
religions, or between
religion and non-
religion.
And to all the people who think that science is cold and heartless
with no soul or hope as opposed to
religion which is warm and fuzzy and gives people hope: how many lives does science save every single day as opposed to
religion; clothe people; keep them warm; let them communicate better; let them eat better and live in better safety than what
religion could ever, or has ever, provided?
it's comical how
religion can take a person
with little more than a grade school education — and elevate their mind to the level where they literally believe they can argue subjects for
which they are so completely ill - equipped — that virtually everything they posit seems as if it's coming from an 8 year old child.
They still have to comply
with federal and state laws,
which means gays are out, but everyone else has to be considered for employment by the company (the only exceptions to the law are where your
religion or other protected status are essential for the job... for example, a Muslim couldn't sue an Episcopalian church who wouldn't hire them in an administrative role because their faith clashes
with that of the church — things like that don't apply to a fast food chain).
you sir are practicing a
religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool
which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in
with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your
religion.
This new mutuality is one that allows each community to maintain its own faith integrity in relationship
with God,
with the members of its own covenant,
with the members of the most proximate
religion (
which I hold is, for Jews, Christianity), and
with the world beyond.
And this guy comes in
with the one
religion which actually might be more insane than christianity:) muslims and christians, christians and muslims... you're all exactly the same.
Written as a song of overt adoration addressed to God,
which in the Christian context might be label as worship, «Portrait» subtly removes the stereotypes of
religion often associated
with such lyrics as, Christ — Jah flesh; Christ — light within; Christ — beginning and the end.
The problem
with religion is not
religion in and of itself, but the way in
which the unscrupulous and / or indiscriminate perennially try to co-opt the role of governance within a state of law in it's name to suit their desires and against the will of the governed.
What would have become of Judaism in civilizations whose character was shaped by
religions such as Hinduism or Buddhism,
which themselves had no original connection
with Judaism at all?
«Conscience» is not a matter of determining what I want to do and then doing it; «conscience» is my search for truths that can be known to be true and then binding myself to those truths,
which stand in judgment on me and on society: «If, in keeping
with the prevailing modern idea, conscience is reduced to the subjective field to
which religion and morality have been banished, then the crisis of the West has no remedy and Europe is destined to collapse upon itself.
According to The New Encyclopædia Britannica, the one called St.Augustine's «mind was the crucible in
which the
religion of the New Testament was most completely fused
with the Platonic tradition of Greek philosophy; and it was also the means by
which the product of this fusion was transmitted to the Christendoms of medieval Roman Catholicism and Renaissance Protestantism.»
Whether one agrees
with his politics or thinks he'd be a competent president is a different matter — but thank you for writing a great article on
religion and avoiding the attacking, degrading and slandering of other writers» approach,
which - while probably provoking interest and getting many reads - is simply disappointing and quite frankly hypocritical when it comes to
religion.
Maybe instead of spending all this time trying to tear down everyone that doesn't buy his
religion he should spend his resources trying to use his
religion of science and naturalism (
which is what atheism really is) to come up
with something to better this world.
Michael «As a gay man I appreciate there efforts and support, but I think putting up this sign isn't really the best way to get through to people, all it does is create more hate, intolerance, and separation, I am not a christian but I am very spiritual, and putting up this sign implies that all gay people are atheists
which is the furthest thing from the truth, I have no problem
with religion, I have a problem
with those who use there
religions to control and hate others, same applies
with atheism, if you don't want to believe in anything than fine, just don't push your non beliefs on me.»
Funny that the article doesn't mention «Children of the Corn,»
which is displays a grotesque, cruel
religion with many parallels to radical Christian faiths.
But Catholics upset
with their
religions have only to step over to the Episcopal church,
which is very similar and also has religious orders.
One can say
with confidence that, in the last several decades, there is nobody who has done serious work on the fascinating connections between law and
religion, and the ways in
which worldviews inform the res publica, who is not deeply indebted to this man.
That has nothing much to do
with who belongs to
which phony
religion.
The problem
with athiesm
which the buddhist scholar Alan Watts pointed out is that it all to often devolves into dogmatism like
religion.
The concept of god
with some tribes in Australia and the Americas differed yet the majority had worship outside of the known physical man
which was the prime purpose of God as written by the major
religions.
They have nothing to do
with religion,
which should seek to bring people together, rather than rend them apart.
When the nation of Israel (of
which Jerusalem was NEVER a part) was destroyed by the Assyrians in the 700's, the nation of Judah,
with it's capital of Jerusalem, shared the same
religion and hill - based people and many of the Israeli's escaped to Judah.
What I see
with religion is that it comes from man
which Jesus warned you to not get your understanding from in Matt 16:13 - 20.
I don't like Mitt Romney and it has nothing to do
with his
religion,
which is a joke just like the others.
As a gay man I appreciate there efforts and support, but I think putting up this sign isn't really the best way to get through to people, all it does is create more hate, intolerance, and separation, I am not a christian but I am very spiritual, and putting up this sign implies that all gay people are atheists
which is the furthest thing from the truth, I have no problem
with religion, I have a problem
with those who use there
religions to control and hate others, same applies
with atheism, if you don't want to believe in anything than fine, just don't push your non beliefs on me.
While I don't consider it «obviously stupid» for anyone to wear clothing
which expresses his commitment to his
religion and encourages morality, I do think it's pretty stupid to write a post
with your ignorance blatantly pasted all over it.
Religion encourages the need to cloak one's self in a security blanket
which only belittles any argument presented by the
religion — and they do it
with a 2000 year old book.
Shadowplay highlights the wealth of contemporary allusion surrounding Portia's espousal to Bassanio, designed to remind the Queen of her allegorical flirtation
with England» and before Jacobs ridicules the idea of a lost level of meaning in
which Bassanio represents Elizabeth's subjects, a reviewer who professes to respect the «various forms and genres and techniques of literary writing» will be aware that poems and plays in the mid-sixteenth century regularly celebrated England's courtship of the monarch, and that literary characters representing England were commonplace, though disguised in order to subvert the ban on discussing contemporary politics and
religion.
You may one day be surprised to learn that there is a universe of things to believe in and discuss — none of
which have anything to do
with religion or god.
All these
religions and the Gods associated
with them were created by man to gain power and control the ignorant masses and put some order into societies
which were dispersed throughout the planet.
With the number of
religions in the world its difficult to really know
which is the right one.
I guess what helps me draw conclusions about the nature of God has to do
with the question of «why»
which is really what
religion is all about.