Certainly human history is at least as riddled
with abuse of religions as it is with abuse of racial groups.
Not exact matches
People have the right to leave church and organized
religion, they have a right to question an institution that will do anything to save face even if it means letting children be harmed (and trust me, there are Priests that have issues
with girls - my mom when to an all girls» Catholic school in the 60s and talks about how many
of the priests used to «hang out»
with the young girls out and girls have been
abused), churches that are not practicing social justice.
You are just a victim
of the child
abuse that is
religion, you were brainwashed
with it as a child.
I care about getting people away from his
abuse and helping them heal in whatever way is right for them [which may not have anything to do
with religion of any sort].
All
religions have individuals who represent the very worst
of humanity in the forms
of greed,
abuse, hatred, oppression, and a desire to see those who would dare to disagree
with their ideologies, in thought or deed, get their comeuppance either now or in some afterlife.
Even though I am a minister I actually agree
with you that some
of what I see that's taught in the name
of religion I also consider
abuse.
This also entirely sidesteps the notion that having a
religion is really a form
of mental illness but usually one brought about by systemic child
abuse in the homes
of these individuals whereby young minds are snuffed out by lies, deceit and
with the threat
of barbaric punishment.
Organized
religion is the root
of most evils today:
Abuse of children and women, wars over religious territories, terrorists
with radical religious beliefs, denial
of a women's right to choose, denial
of gay rights, oppression
of differing cultures, corruption in churches, synagogues, mosques, etc..
The above coupled
with all kinds
of abuses that people perpetrate in the name
of religion makes me wonder whether the Church is really playing its biblical role as Jesus would require
of us.
Parents should be aware that violent depictions are more frequent and intense than in its predecessor, although this edition is softer
with its criticisms
of religion and animal
abuse, and contains only female cleavage instead
of male rear nudity.
Tags: A journey through the moral landscape
of Britain,
abuse, addiction, amazon, amazon books, amazon ebook, aspire, author, behavior, book, book review, britain, british, bullying, celebrity, ebook, ebooks, economic, england, envy, goodreads, greed, happiness, happy, I Spy
With My Little Eye, kindle, kindle book, kindle ebook, Linnea Mills, literature, lust, money, morals, non fiction, nonfiction, novel, politics, power, publishing, reading,
religion, religious, review, reviews, seven deadly sins, social, social media, society, studies, study, trends, trolls, writing
Many atheist scientist, upset
with past travesties
of mankind done in the name
of religion, rebel at the word «God», because
of past
abuse to control people.
Sante Center for Healing: www.santecenter.com — secular treatment center for SA outside Dallas Setting Captives Free: www.settingcaptivesfree.com — Christ centered hope through on - line courses Sex Addiction Help: www.sexaddictionhelp.com — secular website
with extensive information Sexual
Abuse Survivors Support Year - Round, Inc.: www.sassyinc.org Sexual Identity Therapy Framework: www.SITframework.com — addresses sexual orientation,
religion and values — Throckmorton & Yarhouse Sexual Recovery Institute: www.sexualrecovery.com — secular treatment clinic outside Los Angeles — Robert Weiss, LCSW Sexual Wholeness Institute: www.sexualwholeness.com — Christian sexual therapy Sierra Tucson: www.sierratucson.com — secular treatment for addicts, spouses, and families Society for the Advancement
of Sexual Health: www.sash.net — secular organization for treatment
of sex addiction
«Furthermore, in light
of the evidence in the record that the father harmed the children by disobeying court orders and using
religion to alienate them from the mother, we conclude that the court did not
abuse its discretion by prohibiting the father from discussing
religion with the children.»