Sentences with phrase «with achieving nothing»

What I always find particularly frustrating is that our own fans equate our failure to win a trophy over the last five years with achieving nothing.

Not exact matches

«Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude from achieving his goal; nothing on earth can help the man with the wrong mental attitude.Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude from achieving his goal; nothing on earth can help the man with the wrong mental attitude.nothing on earth can help the man with the wrong mental attitude.»

I fear, at least for the moment, history will judge this meeting as nothing more than a Potemkin summit — filled with countless photos designed to pull at your heart, when in fact, zero was achieved.

History is likely to judge this meeting as nothing more than a Potemkin summit — filled with photos designed to pull at your heart, when in fact, zero was achieved.

These founders came to a new country with almost nothing and achieved the ultimate American dream.

Nothing is sadder than seeing someone with so much potential achieve nothing due to a lack of Nothing is sadder than seeing someone with so much potential achieve nothing due to a lack of nothing due to a lack of effort.

Good luck with your ebook... you have to give someone credit who tries to achieve their dreams as many talk about it yet and do nothing about it.

Later within the interview, Barhydt hinted that Abra might be prolonged to supply far more than currencies of their app, mentioning his intention to supply people in growing markets with the flexibility to achieve publicity to Apple inventory by the use of nothing greater than a smartphone with some bitcoin on it.

Nothing else we «achieved» has any meaningful nexus with U.S. jobs.

There is nothing wrong with working hard to achieve good results — in fact there is every reason to work hard and give our best to what we do.

But in this case the whole populations are rejecting the president and the whole of his political party which he represents whom been lying to the people for 30 years and achieved nothing for their populations but manage to secure their people while populations are starving with no jobs, prices rising currency dropping!?

He concludes his critical investigation in The Historical Jesus: The Life of a Mediterranean Jewish Peasant with the astonishing sentence «If you can not believe in something produced by reconstruction, you may have nothing left to believe in...» [5] Yet no critical reconstruction of any kind can achieve a representation of the original reality of Jesus» career beyond the realm of probability.

While there is nothing wrong with achieving your goals, the problem comes when we begin to equate our achievements with our value.

We need mindless, self indulgent Narcissists who bend with the wind believing in nothing and achieving nothing.

I don't necessarily believe that the current system is beyond reform, there are some positive movements in this direction, but nothing short of a whole change of perception and thought is necessary; not something that can be achieved with just a little nudge and encouragement.

@PRISM, There is nothing wrong with pride if you have lived a life or achieved a success that warrants it.

Nothing was achieved at Hagenau, and Luther was clearly pleased with his efforts to make sure of that result.

«Knowing that I'm a child of God and that his love for me is determined by nothing I can achieve or do on my own has given me a quiet confidence,» DiRado told CT (click here for our full interview with her).

It's been one of those post-exam weeks where I have literally achieved nothing with my time.

The Growth Lab at Food Matters Live, hosted by The Aurora Ceres Partnership Ltd provides the opportunity for young and growing food companies to connect with the essential support functions, form innovation specialist, product developers and trading standards that can help them achieve their dreams and ensure that those obstacles are nothing more than minor distractions.

We need a manager with some ambition and not someone who is paid huge sums of money to achieve nothing.

Henrikh Mkhitaryan has insisted that he has nothing to prove after his failed Manchester United stint, adding that he is hoping to achieve more with Arsenal than he did with his former club.

It got so bad that Fernando decided that he'd prefer to do the Indy 500 than race at Monaco, and on a few occasions even retired a car that had nothing wrong with it because he couldn't be bothered to drive around near the back with no hope of achieving anything meaningful.

he was also not slow in Bringing back former manager Mourhino - a man with a proven pedigree and understanding of the modern game — Abramovich takes no prisoners he wants to win — While Chelsea continue to sweep aside all in their path, Abramovich stops at nothing to achieve football success!

But one big point you're failing to understand is that with that better team we've achieved NOTHING BETTER than a top 4 finish the last decade.

Dude it would have been beta, if we had spent that 90million and be sure of some real competition, rather than spending 60million + & be wishing or hoping that sanchez can play top 9, chambers fufil his potential, welbeck can be the man 4 us, wilshere achieves his potential, with so many other wishes & at the end of the day end up with nothing.

As far as am concerned we have achieved nothing yet.In fact our epl form is flattering.We are bottom of our UCL group, out of the league cup and already the treatment room is full with the usual suspects.

We will always be remembered (thanks to Wenger) as a club with massive potential, but achieved nothing.

The criteria for the manager is dependent on more than just trophies, some teams know they need to build themselves up before winning things and a great manager could be one that builds the team with next to nothing and over achieves with a bunch of under achievers.

So, along with Granit Xhaka, this means that Arsenal have achieved necessary reinforcement in all three outfield departments, and so left themselves with nothing to do.

it will be good achievement but nothing near what AW has achieved with Arsenal....

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Wenger manage to please them by spending few money and still making the club have profit.Imagine all those clubs outside the top 4 crying for the CL place as there is so much money involved, that why Wenger is untouchable by the board.He is over achieving compare to what he spend and he does not spend in order to win but to compete.Don t come with your crap talk about Ozil and Sanchez, their buy did not solve nothing of the serious needs of the team, it was Hollywood signing just to woaw around people and supporters.

Supposedly, Brendan Rodgers is already in talks with Pirlo over a lucrative short - term deal and it's believed the move could happen if the Turin - based side win the Champions League this season, as the veteran would have nothing left to achieve with his current side.

Let's see what they can achieve this season — maybe nothing but I'll remain with Arsenal.

Last night was a disgusting display and Ill tell you why I think this, Since the Swansea game last week its become highly apparent that for teams who are looking to get a point OR beat us the tactic is simple, park the bus and then get us on the break, Last night our team SHOULD have been steamrollering to try and achieve 2nd spot, but the fight has gone because they knew a point would suffice, the season ai nt over until the last game and whilst 2nd spot means nothing with regards to trophies it means everything with regards to pride and bragging rights for the fans.

I suggest sir you achieved nothing and that as early as in the 1st half yesterday you realised you little more than make a fool of yourself with the thick - skinned and callous mind you possess.

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

Its no wonder that Arsenal are such a shower of sh*t when they have such unambitious and easily pleased «fans» And its no wonder that he has remained in post for so long, just stumbling through each season and achieving nothing when so many are pleased with nothing.

When we were signing young players for the lamentable project youth, they were, with the exception of anelka, cesc and bellerin, generally relative nobodies with fewprofessional games under their belts, little in the way of youth achievement that could be demonstrated, and having achieved nothing as pros.

Whilst we can look back with some sentimentality to these times the fact of the matter has they achieved nothing and they were beginning to take up squad places with their names only.

However, by trying to achieve this in a financially sustainable way, he could be taking too much risk and, given the stiff «new world» competition he has to deal with, he might fail and we might end up with winning nothing for years to come.

Bournemouth will go into this match with nothing to lose and look to replicate the success that Burnley and Swansea City had at Wembley, but they are unlikely to achieve that.

There is nothing as exciting in Calcio than a Derby Della Madonnina match between two enthusiastic teams with seasonal objective yet to be achieved.

There is nothing wrong with these figures except they are virtually impossible to be achieved under typical home environment.

Fashionable momma, there's nothing wrong with that at all, and I'm going to tell you how you can achieve that fashionable mother look without compromising your abilities as a superhuman parent.

You should know that nothing can be achieved with unconstructive actions.

It needs to become more like a typical European social democratic party, which recognises that nothing can be achieved without forging alliances with others.

Isn't greater home - ownership the best opportunity for people to escape state dependency and invest in a simple, low - risk asset over a life - time that will allow people who started with nothing to achieve their goal of total financial independence?

Here's the issue: the entire four - day message of the Convention was not about expanding Trump's base of support among minorities or women (the 2016 GOP platform says nothing about providing «equal pay for equal work»; it was not about proposing substantive solutions to problems facing the nation; it was not even about making amends with traditional conservatives and moderate Republicans to achieve party unity (the Republican governor of Ohio, John Kasich, the Bush family, and all former Republican nominees for president, except one, did not attend).