Sentences with phrase «with actual thinking»

«If built around a personality it probably has nothing to do with actual thinking «Justin Harrison Tweets about Bjørn Lomborg's proposed...

Very biast with no actual thought put into it.

Not exact matches

Something clicks when you stop thinking about building your empire and start working with actual customers.

Spending more minutes thinking about the levers required to generate actual engagement should fill the gap in marketers» time as they seek to reduce waste and step up interaction with their content and messaging.

But as far as actual participation... it's one of those things that should be done with a lot of thought, if it needs to be done.

But you know as far as the actual participation I think it's something that... It's historically relevant because history has never been without it but it's one of those things that should be done with a lot of thought if it needs to be done.

Sticking with our recent articles on Amazon private label selling and market traction, I thought I would talk with an actual million dollar private label brand, who is finding success, through methods like developing original products, and share that with you.I talked with Raj Jana, the Founder of JavaPresse Coffee Company, who is building a brand that creates meaningful products and experiences that help people make the most of the moments they love, which starts with the ritual of making and drinking one perfect cup of coffee every single day.

To add to John's third point, I also think there's an issue with businesses assessing candidates by their education vs. their actual work experience.

«Foreigners think Indonesia is a big market, with 230 million population and all... but what's your actual addressable market?»

When measures of both are hard - negative, as they are now, investors should think carefully about their own risk - tolerance and their ability to sustain losses without abandoning their discipline, making sure to align their investments with the actual horizon over which they will need to spend the funds.

We think this method is the best way to show your actual investment performance with LendingCrowd, but please remember:

I would have to say, taking into account the number of injuries you could have worked on personally and the likelyhood of them being Atheists and the likelyhood of you knowing this ahead of time that the person was an ACTUAL Atheist or God Hater (have not met one of them) I sort of think you are embellishing just a bit get your some point across that has little substance to begin with.

There is actual possibility - which you are talking about and which I am talking about in this sentence about «2 possible meanings,» and then there is also theoretical possibility - which I thought it was obvious that I was talking about with respect to my comments on a / theory / of time.

Mary I would think that with churches all donations are tax deductible and the church does not pay taxes... the tax payers have in actual fact still paid for this as they do for all churches.

Vince does have some some free things to go along with the book, but I don't think an actual t - shirt is one of them... Here is a link.

This is because some youngsters who think they will opt for an abortion if they get pregnant, may not do so when theyare faced with the actual decision.

I personally don't think Steve was «fair» with all of the biblical accounts of violence, since he often cuts off quotations in mid-sentence, but with all the clear «unfairness» in Scripture where actual human lives are getting «cut off» by God, it's hard to quibble over minor details like that.

It may be best to think of justification as being «in right standing» with God whereas eternal life is the actual reception of God's life in us.

The reasonable response to an incorrect assumption is to correct it rather than just saying that my assumptions are false with no actual indication of an assumption you think I made which is false.

While I tend to agree with the views posted by Cpt Obvious, Tim, dandintac, et al, I do admire that you are presenting your point of view in a personal manner and seem to have put some actual thought into it and you recognize that not everyone will have the same experience as you, and you don't condemn others for not feeling the same way (although it does make me wonder what your thoughts are on eternal torment for non-believers).

I would say self education is huge, and actual tangible relationship — planning on being face to face with someone who doesn't think like you.

I think that they are probably frustrated and a little sad that children are indoctrinated with little regard for their actual needs.

Initially, Whitehead might seem to identify actual occasions as res vera to the exclusion of persons; however, careful thought, along with the addition of other Whiteheadian ideas, such as organic unities, casts doubt on the suspicion that for Whitehead only actual occasions are res vera.

I do nt think actual vegans would be happy with me.

Research studies have shown that many scientists are now trending towards believing in at least some form of divinity however; I think it's largely that we're only now letting science get the oppression it experienced over some of the religious wars fought over political reasons with little to do with actual beliefs or study.

A fourth reason why Whitehead chose occasions of experience for his «actual entities» emerges as a reader becomes familiar with his thought.

Now it will be useful for us to think about those people in their concrete situation and with their actual ways of looking at themselves and their world.

Some might find it more accurate to say that Paul teaches so - and - so albeit recognizing the problems reconciling his words with James and even Jesus himself.Also, many have come to think that because the words attibuted to Jesus in the fourth gospel are so unlike the synoptics that it's highly unlikey to be his actual speech (via translation) and what were likely reading is John's interpretation of who Jesus is.

Lowe asks «What is there in Bergson's thought that corresponds to the three conceptions — of actual entity, prehension, and nexus — with which Whitehead tries to assure the correctness of his own?»

When a preacher understands this and is prepared to wrestle with it in his thinking before he does his actual preaching, he will have a deeper insight into the long - continuing Christian awareness of what God was «up to» in the event of Jesus Christ and hence what God is always and everywhere «up to» in the divine dealings with men and women in any and every culture.

It should not be surprising then that Whitehead thought of God as a single actual entity immune to the possibility of loss.59 At least William Christian sees this as the proper Whiteheadian view.60 Nevertheless, Christian's position is challenged by Ivor Leclerc, who argues, in agreement with Hartshorne, that Christian's conclusion is incompatible with the categoreal scheme elaborated in chapter two of Process and Reality.61 Here, according to Leclerc, Whitehead «makes clear» that the category of «subjective perishing» is «necessarily applicable to every actual entity whatever, including God.»

Unlike much of the inherited Western tradition, which has equated creativity with mentality and attributed it only to human beings, process thought considers anything actual at all an instance of creativity, from the tiniest energy event to the most complex creatures we are aware of, human beings; some degree of mentality is present in no matter how rudimentary, even negligible, a form.

Next, with regard to the very important role of the concept of «the future» in Dr. Altizer's thought, I find a very considerable ambiguity here, as to whether the future as eschatological future is grasped as vision or as analysis of actual existence in faith.

I think it's all about focus on what Jesus said and did with his life... and how that effects someone's actual behavior «in the now».

It must be known to you, Gentlemen, that these words can affect men to tears who never connect them in thought with the actual geographical Jerusalem; who connect it in thought merely with a quite different native home from which they are exiles.

Also, it seems more reasonable to think of these periodic events as aggregate events which are the outcome of coordinated activities of constituent occasions than to think of them as acts of single individuals (although Whitehead does identify subatomic pulses with single actual occasions).

Thus, as most FWTs see it, the relevant question is which of the following pictures of God is most appealing: (1) a God who creates individuals who only think they are free but are actually controlled by God and thus produce no evil or (2) a God who bestows actual freedom on individuals even though such freedom may produce (has produced) much evil along with much good.

The rigid adherence to microcosmic ultimate event - units as the sole actual entities seems to us to be not only inadequate with respect to the [254] higher forms of unity, but also to introduce an inconsistency in Whitehead's thinking.

What he meant by this was as a whole an accomplishment of varied activity that expresses the potentialities of individuals interacting with their actual environments as much as possible, if, as Whitehead thought, each individual is the embodiment of the adventure of life, of existence itself, the art of life is the guiding of this advance.

I think we have here a fundamental starting point in Hartshorne's philosophy, a starting point which represents his intuition: thought (meaningful discourse) is concerned with awareness, actual or possible, creaturely or divine.

But at present psychologists are tending, first, to admit that the actual unit is more probably the total mental state, the entire wave of consciousness or field of objects present to the thought at any time; and, second, to see that it is impossible to outline this wave, this field, with any definiteness.

To carry through the process of rethinking the account of actual occasions and eternal objects in the light of the full doctrine of God will be in line with the direction in which Whitehead's own thought was moving at this point and will also alter in subtle, but at times important, ways the precise form of the doctrine of God.

I do think, however, that we are getting closer to your actual feelings on the subject, the deeply held beliefs about homosexuality that you try to defend with all of your quotes and attempts to disparage scientific study.

If it helps, you might think of it this way: some atheists have a religious requirement that they MUST always pray with head UN-bowed (and also not to any god or gods and also not with any actual prayer).

As far as when I've told others that I'll pray for them, depending on the situation, I've either done the «state of being» with a sort of «positive thoughts sent their way»... sometimes more of a reflection, a «holding you in my heart» sort of thing... and sometimes, because regardless of what it means to me, I know what it means to the other person, an actual on my knees prayer to god.

At least we do actual things with our hands instead of mumbling in a corner thinking that's going to accomplish anything.

Yet, given the logical problems connected with the notion of a finite actual entity somehow prehending the objective integration of the primordial and consequent natures within God (as indicated above), it makes sense to think of God's influence on the concrescing actual occasion simply in terms of divine feelings vis - à - vis objective possibilities already present in the world as a common field of activity for God and all finite actual occasions.

In the actual and concrete event of their occurring, they have carried with them in their organic richness the worth that they have been thought or found to possess: that is intrinsic to their very occurrence.

And here biblical thought, despite its mythological idiom and its scientific inaccuracy, was much more in accordance with common sense, as well as with the actual situation at the time of death.

That is to say, they think of God in accordance with the model of a «society,» and more precisely in accordance with the model of that «society» which consists of one temporal thread of successive actual entities (a «route» of actual entities).