The net effect of the remodelling is to create statistically significant warming of 0.7 °C in the ACORN - SAT mean temperature series for Rutherglen: in general agreement
with anthropogenic global warming theory.
Of course this does not accord
with anthropogenic global warming theory.
Not exact matches
Plus, you seem to be confusing «AGW
theory» (
anthropogenic global warming)
with «the greenhouse effect.»
Those who support the
theory of
anthropogenic global warming (AGW), now known as
anthropogenic climate change so that recent cooling can be included in their scenario, always deny that the sun has anything to do
with recent
global temperature movements.
Joel, please don't take offense, but I do not think that your
theory would work
with either the
theory of
anthropogenic global warming (AGW) or
with heat transfer engineering.
His work is compelling and is yet one more example of a prominent scientist that disagrees
with the
anthropogenic theory of
global warming.
In the 1990s, Seitz» work
with the George C. Marshall Institute changed to debunking
anthropogenic global warming by publishing reports and opinions of those questioning the
theory.
There are thousands of scientists in climate - related fields (statisticians, geologists, meteorologists, physicists) that have issues
with various aspects of the dominant
theory of catastrophic
anthropogenic global warming.
Over the past few weeks I have had many opportunities to discuss the
theory of
anthropogenic global warming with a variety of people.
If the
anthropogenic global warming theory was correct, the infrared «back - radiation» should have instead increased year - round over the past 14 years along
with the steady rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide.
You do nt have to replace the
theory of
anthropogenic global warming with anything.